If we change sats to bitcoin what the fuck do we call a bitcoin?
A hundred million bitcoins?
Do you know how confusing that is?
There’s only ever supposed to be 21 million bitcoin.
Thread
Login to reply
Replies ()
A bigcoin, lmao.
How much is smolcoin?
That was great 😂
And what about all the writing and historical records so far? And all the accounting done so far? Etc.
Money and language are incredibly important. Messing with either always leads to disaster. Organic emergence is the sane, healthy, and natural approach.
Gigi You're a hero! 💜 Or are you a Zionist too like Peter Todd?🤦♂️😓
Omg Todd is pro Israeli state too?
He's just a fucking government propagandist wtf
Nooo, when I said I lost 30 BTC in the boating accident it was 30 sats, your honour. Here's the 7 sats Cap Gains anyway.
Yes! He would like all the Palestinians who died of hunger or deported to Libya. He wrote it yesterday in a post right here on nostr 🤷♂️😰
He is a genius of the code and ₿ but a Zionist racist of those fanatics
😖🤷♂️
Are you saying you don't think language should be centrally planned? Anarchist!
Personally I don't give a dime, a Benjamín or a red cent to creative, artistic terms for money.
The metric system is so logical. Hundreds, tens and units are easy to handle and visualise. Stick to similar: Bitcoin, something and Sats.
Any other term is just noise and will create barriers to adoption of a money that is supposed to be plain, simple truth.
Yes of course! Bitcoin is not even touched in the vocabulary
It’s meant to create confusion. If there are suddenly orders of magnitude more bitcoin, it undermines the entire narrative and turns normies off because they’ll think it’s a scam.
nevent1qqsqqqt9vhz9ksv5wztuhm0x02rwfd58u9uyv57schfuv94fs6srvpspzfmhxue69uhk7enxvd5xz6tw9ec82cs6389ur
If there is a name that needs to be changed, lets focus on Worcestershire Sauce for now.
Jack just got crazy. Or perhaps he is testing something.
No matter how smart someone is, they will still have some stupid opinions… for which they should be made fun of to teach them humility
If we’re stuck on “how we call a bitcoin” instead of just making the damn system smoother for everyone, we’re missing the bigger picture: mass adoption won’t happen if we keep confusing new users with tiny decimals, fractions, and weird terms.
Don't let them distract you with renaming sats to bits.
Run Knots.
#bitcoin
View quoted note →
I vote to rename sats to “niggers”
Motion denied
Just made the change on my node
It would actually make more sense than "bitcoins"
If I find out I’ve zapped millions of bitcoin in this app I’m going to be so embarrassed.
You can't centrally plan language. You don't change what things come to be called by decree, that's literally the most fiat thing ever.
Also, if someone is so confused by sats being subunits of bitcoins, they def do not have the mental capacity to deal with private keys.
It’s fucking dumb
2.1 quadrillion
We will not call Sats Bitcoin. Easy. I don't know who started this fuckery but Bitcoin = Freedom. I'm not a sheep.
21 million bitcoin isn’t enough for everyone but 2.1 quadrillion…it’s plenty to go around
correct, and it’s only confusing for you and going to be a lot less confusing for others as they begin using bitcoin
A Satoshi. 🤣
#bitcoin #memes
Trust Jack and trump
We're not changing the name. SATs are the standard and are here to stay.
1 Bitcoin will always be 1/21,000,000th of the whole network, and 1 Sat will always be the smallest unit on the network. But I don't believe 1 Bitcoin will always equal 100,000,000 Sats.
nevent1qqst6dc88520q8l792s6xamr60xqt96gxhstdj0zfjt6qmjynvx789gzyzmul4rjl7grgs0vdn24hdgxl96yyydxu689y5jagfz9z6da5ql45qcyqqqqqqgj6fuq9
There are 21 million square kilometers. Each of those can be divided into 100,000,000 square centimeters. A centimeter is not a kilometer. A Sat is not a Bitcoin.
Words change, but the fundamental principles that make Bitcoin, #Bitcoin
Stay the same
It only cosmetic, and has zero no impact
View quoted note →
Jack Dorsey of all people think it’s a good idea
Meanwhile Steak & Shakeus accepting bitcoin nationally and Square terminals still don’t
He needs to focus on what matters
Not this retarded dumb ass BIO
Things that were supposed to be about Bitcoin:
*21 million Bitcoin
*Peer to peer cashless online transactions
*Bypassing financial institutions
*Proof of work
And anything else stated in the paper that introduced Bitcoin.
Just say whatever the fuck you want. This is so fucking stupid. Everyone but me is retarded.
Limited supply, the longer you wait the more expensive it gets. Better start stacking sats today
If we change sats to bitcoin what the fuck do we call a bitcoin?
A hundred million bitcoins?
Do you know how confusing that is?
There’s only ever supposed to be 21 million bitcoin.
View quoted note →
We'll call 'em gigamegs
Wait, there's really a discussion going on about this? That's sounds like a joke.
Dollars and cents.
Bitcoin and sats.
Why is it so hard?