Thread

Replies (50)

I think they mean that eventually, the like-mindedness is tested and a bifurcation always occurs. The two groups have to exist together in some manner that does not recognize the previously held like-mindedness... The people who think like this believe their current system of court rules, so-called Law, and other accumulated anomalies that they call the Justice system is some Holy Grail that can never be replicated and is always growing and changing on it's own, at their behest and profit of course. The even have fanatical overtones to their Religion of "justice". It's insane and irrational and they want you in it! I completely agree with you on the simplicity of agreeing on the basics like the "no pro-murder", but knowledge and opinions are fractal. There will always be someone who has a complicated take on killing the murderer and there will be people that agree. The same for theft. Is theft the same as stealing? That is a whole other debate. What about the stealing food to avoid starvation or the latest hunger pang? Qualia flavors EVERYTHING and obliterates like-mindedness. If we could live with our hearts, then yes. But we live in a material world and we use our brains to do it. Logic and reason divide the mind. The heart suffers for it. You have piqued my curiosity on this Lander, Wyoming thing. Is the Prairie Republic dot net website, the current embodiment of the movement? I was fascinated by the Free State Project. Now I've got some more research to do. Thank you!
It's funny... The republics start entire countries but don't have currencies. The Bitcoiners have currency but no country. Why don't the bitcoiners start or join a new republic like the www.prairierepublic.net and adopt a bitcoin currency? That way you get a constitution and a trustless banking system.
User's avatar npub1hk0t...20pf
I wish there was a small town somewhere that bitcoiners would just take over and make our own. I have lots of fantasies about this, but I’m pretty sure it ends up being a disaster…
View quoted note →
Yep. There must always be better governance. The old forms of governance are morally weak, untrustworthy and incapable of true government which is self-government. The territorial allotment form of government has seen it's worser days... The governance systems of tomorrow must be akin to overlay districts with many forms of optionality built-in... Duress, compulsion and enslavement must be abolished for all but the most serious of crimes which harm others...
Interesting article. I find it a bit strange how the hard core libertarians like Jeffery Tucker and the PorcFest types lean more towards bcash and almost don’t want to talk about increasing their wealth or making money. It’s almost like wealth is power and power goes against the non aggression principle or something. Even Tom Woods seems to know BTC is the best asset but wants to be respectful of BCH. Either way I find myself relating less and less with libertarians and more with conservatives.
I think a lot of people in the Free Talk Live circle were introduced to Bitcoin by Roger Ver, so when he went to the BCH side of things they went too. I haven't listened to FTL in a bit, but lately they talk about Dash or Monero more, I haven't heard them talk about BCH in a bit. What blows my mind even more is that they aren't on Nostr. Sure we won't agree on currencies, fine, but isn't Nostr is more in line with their values than Twitter?
Supposedly this is the purpose of private property. To be a check and balance against municipal corporate corruption. We have this already. Why not build upon it? Why do we have this innate desire to cluster? Why does it have to be a town or city?
What do we need to make this work. 1. Libertarian hippie mindset but with guns. 2. Would work hard to earn or not have to spend sats. 3. Everyone is rich AF but no one from outside could tell because everyone is living humble and modest homestead lifestyles. If everyone just wants to build a mansion then you are looking at a security estate where power/control and services get centralized through a body corporate. That already exists in fiat world. Homestead communities also exist in fiat world but I think bitcoin changes the incentive structures enough to make for a novel outcome. The more people get involved the more formalised your constitution needs to be. So a community cap could be needed.