Czino // 👫🌱🏡🐈🐈⬛ 1 year ago Not sure if that's absolutely accurate, what if some of your grand parents mingled with distant or not so distant cousins? 😛
Big Barry Bitcoin 1 year ago This is why it's so goddamn hard to illustrate a family tree of any reasonable size!
Leo Wandersleb 🛡️ 1 year ago ↩ replying to Big Barry Bitcoin IT should allow to represent any data set you can research but it quickly gets embarrassing when the closed circles appear on the graph 😅
Big Barry Bitcoin 1 year ago ↩ replying to Leo Wandersleb Well, there's the upward, but then when you come back down, you also have a branching out effect that worsens the ability to fit everyone in.
Leo Wandersleb 🛡️ 1 year ago ↩ replying to Big Barry Bitcoin Oh, you mean you want to draw all the offsprings of all your 4096 10th level great grand parents? That's probably in the billions?
SweedWick 1 year ago And that probably only accounts for the last 200-250 years or so. Math! Procreation!!
npub1erwn...4fkx 1 year ago Let's bless our ancestors every day. We are living in the most comfortable period of the history with technology, information and science. walker Cool graphic from Brian Roemmele. View quoted note →
Jamesy227 🛡️ 1 year ago I think incest may skew these numbers somewhat, particularly a few centuries ago
🇵🇸 whoever loves Digit 1 year ago Continuing this out, my calculator says if you go back 40 generations you have a trillion ancestors? I wish Digit was here to explain the math better
Callum 1 year ago A flawed understanding of human ancestry illustrated by a base 2 progression that most ppl moderately familiar with computers know off by heart. I'm not seeing the 'coolness' here