Thread

Replies (27)

I think this is the key point. It is aligned with @jack recent note talking about mini/micro-apps. IMO, enhancing compatibility between apps at the protocol level could significantly improve the developer ecosystem. One feature I really would like to see is something that farcast protocol has already well implemented: frames. It would be a great evolution allowing notes to serve as standalone app in the timeline. It would open many windows for new solutions over here. View quoted note →
I'm thinking about hiring nostr devs at this point. Building a novel nostr client solo is tedious and has taken me years to understand the poor documentation. What we really need is someone to fund seasoned nostr devs to make the NIPs human and AI readible with examples and less nuanced. This way devs new to the space can get faster traction. Like read nip-07, there's almost no context! There's no documentation on how to signEvent without nostr-tools in pure js. It's been a lot of pain.
@jack @fiatjaf When you say "too many" it sounds like there should be some "super apps". I think the market will take care of this on its own. My thoughts? Super apps will likely (and should) end up focusing on consumers of content. Whereas more niche clients should (and probably will) focus on creators of content. streamlining The process for creators to "get information out quickly", with whichever kind(s) their niche requires.