abducting a foreign leader with no losses
that was probably one of the most successful military operations in modern history
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (87)
The US president does not need congressional approval to send troops to an other country or to engage in military actions. Congress must approve a full scale war.
He might as well could’ve invited him over to White House like those publicized meetings and arrested him there. Would’ve saved tax payers 100 million dollars or something.
if it was so easy why didn't u do it
Yes, leaving aside if it was right or wrong, it was undoubtedly successful and more effective than spending decades and trillions of dollars in the Middle East. At least so far.
It is out of the box action. Typical rules are hands off the leaders, but that always assumed assasination, which is why it was not allowed. But when they create a legal issue and just send in the cops, they skipped the war part all together. Wild stuff. Sets a new precedent.
The major issue I see in taking Venezuala is it may embolden China to want to take Tawain.
The US is going to hand over Taiwan
bunch of babies in this comment section. there are no rules or laws in international affairs
like i’m sorry if trump hurt your feelings again…
😆
Mental illness running rampant in here
Oh Odell.
The American gov't has been killing innocent Venezuelan fishermen for months, leading to this.
Julian Assange filed a criminal complaint over the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado, poised to take over the new gov't. She has actively and publicly supported Trump’s attacks to remove Maduro and assume power. She has also backed attacks on Palestinians.
It’s been going on for a while.
US has a long history of intervention through opposition leaders, military force, coups, covert CIA operations, economic pressure, and diplomatic coercion across the Global South, all to protect its economic interests.
This was a template move.
There are many narratives depending on which convinces you to justify this act, just pick one. Drugs. Peace. Liberation. Socialism. China etc etc. It worked during the Cold War. In today’s information era, the world sees right through it and people are pissed.
If the American gov’t put the same effort into developing real competence at home, things would look very different. You don’t need to steal another country's oil and minerals.
I’m afraid America still doesn’t get how strong the world is without it. European gov’t are just as weak, that’s what happens when you take away their financial sovereignty. Today, if the Eastern world or the Global South strikes back, leadership could flip but they are choosing peace, calm, and respect for international law.
What troubles me is the disconnect between advocating for Bitcoin and individual sovereignty while ignoring how state power systematically undermines the sovereignty of other nations.
Wanna liberate people? Empower them to build and defend their own systems, not coerce them from the outside.
I agree with this very much. However there is a scary truth to this situation: state power is how nations work, and Bitcoin/international sovereignty must find an effective way to empower the people (as is intended by the structure of a healthy nation state) in order to defend against this bullying effect. What must the collective do to move the US towards more peaceful diplomacy?
I don’t think his statement was implying anything other than it was swift and free of US casualties.
> US has a long history of intervention through opposition leaders, military force, coups, covert CIA operations, economic pressure, and diplomatic coercion across the Global South, all to protect its economic interests
yes, and this was probably one of the most successful ones
> There are many narratives depending on which convinces you to justify this act
i did not justify it
A lot of keyboard warriors came out yesterday because you stated a fact about delta teams op thinking you were for it lol
> yes, and this was probably one of the most successful ones
Lots of them were successful at removing the existing leaders quickly. The problem is always what happens after that.
Not saying I disagree with removing the guy, but we cannot judge the effectiveness of this operation until we see what comes next, which won’t be clear for months or years. I just hope for Venezuela’s sake the Trump admin has a good plan in place for the next steps.
> we cannot judge the effectiveness of this operation until we see what comes next
of course we can
> I just hope for Venezuela’s sake the Trump admin has a good plan in place for the next steps.
doubt it
Absolutely, fam! This one definitely hit different in terms of success. 🙌 But you’re spot on—it's all about the aftermath. Can’t really call it a win until we see what unfolds next. Fingers crossed the Trump admin has a solid game plan for Venezuela! 🤞 #HopeForVenezuela
So long as America remains divided, it will not build. And as long as it does not build, the population will suffer. You cannot have a peaceful foreign policy when the population is economically fragile.
America hasn't recovered from the aftermath of globalization some 40 years ago. Ironically, globalization was a right-wing decision that concentrated growth in cities that today is championed by the left wing. You see the same in Europe.
Unless Americans come together and demand a serious focus on rebuilding economic resilience at home, nothing changes. You can blame foreigners and migrants only for so long. You can live on slogans like “Make America Great Again” only for so long. You can steal from other countries only so much before decline becomes structural.
If the goal is to make America great, at some point you have to build. And to build, you have to come together.
What comes next is that a few Exxon executives will go back to being obscenely rich, while Venezuelans remain poor after losing control over 80% of their oil reserves.
There is no country from which the US forcefully seized or restructured control over oil that ended up better off in the long run.
Gaddafi nationalized oil and ensured Libyans had free healthcare, free education, and one of the highest standards of living in Africa. Heck, he bridged left and right, something US has not been able to do. But instead the US army sodomized him to death in the name of “liberation from the dictator”, seized the oil and made Libya the poorest in the region.
Ironically, this Venezuela incident would have been a good moment for bitcoin influencers to say “bitcoin fixes this,” because the root of the issue drills down to currency war. Not justifying theft
Your a fucking retard.
An entire Caracas apartment block came down on innocent civilians.
What do you think comes now?
I think he was talking about US loses. Looking from a perspective of operation, you look at loses of those running it.
As they would want us to think. Only such a perfect operation could be performed by Oceania (the US). The only real life way, is for all soldiers and guards to stand down - seems far fetched. Maybe all the guards hated Maduro? Could he pay his security enough to keep them happy in a hyperinflationary environment?
Depends on your time frame, add it to the list of successes in...
Iraq
Afghanistan
Syria
Iran
Nigeria
Yemen
Libya
Vietnam
Palestine
Somalia
etc.
Yay freedom, property rights etc.
he's referring to the military operation specifically, not the strategic or moral implications
Indeed… and the point is, all the above were initially thought of as quick, clean operations.
wasn’t aware that they were
Around 40 people were killed by the way. What a great way to steal other people's wealth!
Sometimes I question the real motives behind American bitcoiners.
Not all of us. Some of us will never praise the atrocities committed by the powers that be. Some of us have thinking brains and loving hearts.
what do you expect in a world of competing geopolitical interests? That everybody sit down and talk it out? grow up
No Americans is the point. One could Argue they didn't want opposition deaths either, ideally, but I mean that's pretty impressive for a battle ops view.
Grown ups see evil and call it out while the rest of you clap as if watching an action movie.
Delusional odell take.
what is the delusion here?
No losses part. But no doubt it was successful, 🇺🇸 is exceedingly good at bombing countries with oil for their own profit.
the report said no US lives lost, which is what he was referring to here. Hard to argue that’s delusional
:P wish he used those words. He didnt tho. No usa lives lost makes sense.
freedom, property rights are just stories those hypocrite influencers sell to fill their pockets. when it comes standing up against the empire that has been colonising & plundering the world, suddenly property rights & freedom has no meaning. fuck those hypocritical parasites, bitcoin was created to help people to escape from the horrors of US empire and now we have so called bitcoin influencers licking the boots of the empire & justify the gangster regime. fucking sick.
> freedom, property rights are just stories those hypocrite influencers sell to fill their pockets.
incoherent
> when it comes standing up against the empire that has been colonising & plundering the world, suddenly property rights & freedom has no meaning.
what do you expect? for everyone in the entire world to just get along and play nice?
> fuck those hypocritical parasites, bitcoin was created to help people to escape from the horrors of US empire and now we have so called bitcoin influencers licking the boots of the empire & justify the gangster regime. fucking sick.
hyperbolic and inaccurate. there is no justification of the "gangster regime" in this post. bitcoin was not created to help people escape the horrors of the US empire.
We lost our Constitution.
does constitution apply to interactions with other countries?
It absolutely does, especially when matters of war are concerned.
was this a matter of war?
Ask the Secretary of “War”.
all I know is that he said FAFO. I don't know if he said it was an act of war. I don't think it was an act of war. Also, when was the last time they actually went through the constitutional process for matters of war (I don't think it should be that way, I'm just saying). Lastly, to answer my own question and invalidate your original statement, the constitution applies to domestic affairs and not international ones
Nothing is invalidated. Even Bush went to Congress for consent in Iraq. He lied to get it, obviously. Now the president doesn’t even bother to do that, which is authoritarian by nature.
Congress has abdicated its role. That's not the president's fault.
I don’t think one negates the other.
Sure it does. If Congress doesn't care to do its job, and the people don't care to hold them to it, the republic is over.
Bombing another country is making war on them, duh!
The US made war on Iran, too, when it bombed them a few months ago.
Congress not holding the president accountable is also an example of losing our Constitution.
It sure does. But that happened once the bureaucratic "expert" class was created.
again, not an act of war
I’m not one to give the Feds the benefit of the doubt.


did the US bomb venezuela??
i agree with you on one thing, that was a very boring conversation. But you insist on consistently making false, idealistic, and fantastical claims so i wanted to call that out
The U.S. did bomb Venezuela. You must not have heard. Is that an act of war?
Gringos never disappoint when it comes to stupidity and lack of historical perspective.
One cannot be surprised your 'empire' is the perfect host for zionist scum parasites.
incoherent and pointless post
go back to smoke your opium then
hahah ok
And got control of the world's largest oil reserves. Win-win: the US wins twice.
Puts a dent in the theory that American dominance is dead
Trumps recent retweet about Putin being the problem shines in a new light
Fuck Trump. Fuck violence. Fuck you for remotely, indirectly supporting it…fucking hypocrite. How dare you call out Peter McCormack years ago and then support this shit ass administration. Fucking kids with wealth.
You sound really happy with your life.
and you are better because you say bad words about people and things that you think are bad. good job
Yes, very happy with my life. You also sound very happy with your life and very good at observations.
Not better. Just not a hypocrite who says anything for money. Thank you for telling me “good job”.
I bet you and @HODL blow on each others buttholes.
China next? North Korea?
To what end?
US stole a shit ton of oil and strategic geopolitical position
Or .......
in terms of the OP itself, there is absolutey no question. insane and disgusting, yes, but flawless it seems. Just a few mild gunfights, and no US deaths. Crazy

abducting a foreign leader with no losses
that was probably one of the most successful military operations in modern history
View quoted note →
The assets included a CIA source operating within the Venezuelan government who assisted the United States with tracking Maduro's location and movements ahead of his capture
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/world/583172/inside-the-operation-how-the-us-moved-to-capture-nicolas-maduro
Have you lost your fucking mind?
This is not something to celebrate.
Get ready for all the TED talks, self help books and movies
death toll is up to 80 people now…
bitcoiners clap like seals for war.
View quoted note →
View quoted note →Interesting. No one getting hurt is always good we suppose. Just depends on what comes next.
Don't care who you are and if you like/don't like it....pretty baller top G stuff
