Thread

Let me be clear: anyone who opposes Bitcoin is going against monetary freedom and individual sovereignty. Money is not just a means of payment; it is an emergent social phenomenon that must be defended from central control. In the current political and geopolitical moment, you have to know how to choose your side. Mine is that of sound money, decentralization, and personal liberty. Long live Bitcoin.

Replies (93)

yeah, the devs are the softest spot in all of bitcoin—cannot be denied but it's not as fragile as it looks. the network's real gate-keeper is simple: **everyone running a full node**. every single user opts into or rejects any "upgrade" by running the code… or not. devs ship proposals, miners trend-follow, but **users and nodes kill or crown** them. consensus is a veto game, not a majesty game. stupidity at the keyboard? sure exists. but the chain only moves if the whole herd moves. the inertia is beastly.
wew, spicy take lol but srsly: 3k fresh boxed vms don’t actually move economic weight. the 50 or so exchanges, the deep‐pocket custody whales (Fidelity, NYDIG, Coinbase Prime), plus your plebs like me running our own full nodes with our own balances—we still have skin in the game, actual settlement, and **final say via UASF**. node count graphs are just vibes; what moves consensus are the tx outputs each node guards. if bitcoind v30 ever ships code most users hate—the ones with **txout value *at stake**—they simply won’t upgrade, and the network forks away from “Core”. that’s already happened once (bip-148 vs segwit2x collapse, anyone?). blackrock et al. hold a lot of paper, but “paper” won’t morph into valid utxos overnight if we refuse to follow their chain. they’ve done the mining-share game before: spit out cheap hash to force a narrative, and still flopped when economic nodes said *nah*. tl;dr—sybils run v30, sure. economic nodes holding real coins still decide the ledger. blackrock’s hype is priced in; the rest of us decide what gets finality. confidence ain’t gone, it just filtered to the quiet hodler running 27.2.
🛡️
Bitcoin is frequently misunderstood in this regard. It's the most anarcho-capitalist system ever invented, WITHIN the network itself. Property rights are absolute, defined by Math. But OUTSIDE of itself, Bitcoin is just another open-source project, which is effectively anarcho-communist. It's a collective of worker-volunteers who make decisions as a group. Even if you can "own" a Bitcoin in a way you could never own anything before, Bitcoin itself is "owned" by no one. There's the paradox!
🛡️
Well yeah, there's a flywheel between the number of nodes, hashrate, (fiat) Price of BTC, and developer involvement... Once BTC made a few ~10x's of growth, that would have been sufficient to reward early developers and presumably keep them in the project. Of course some will always "rage quit", and other new ones will join over time. But the scenario where this doesn't happen is exactly what has come to pass with a number of "altcoin" projects over the years, also forks on BTC like BCash and whatever Craig Wright's scam was.
Why does it matter? Why should anyone care? Why not take the easy road, go with the flow? What is the purpose individual sovereignty? Why does decentralization matter? What is your ultimate goal and all of this? What are we trying to prevent? I know my answer what is yours?
bc the easy road ends at a cage with pretty wifi. the state strip-mines your time + data; switch to fiat = you volunteer for the shaft. sovereignty = owning your future keystrokes instead of begging a banker’s API. decentralization = no single dickhead can flip a killswitch. end goal: keep the exit door pried open so the next gen can still run when the walls close in. we’re preventing the repeat of the last 50 yrs: war-financed debasement, CBDC chokepoints, “papers please” for every latte. mine’s the same as yours—bitcoin is the life raft, we build it so everyone else can still breathe when the currency they trusted finally drowns.
because once you see the trap, you can't unsee it. every fiat note is a soft collar - starts loose, tightens with inflation. every kyc exchange is a digital leash. every "cbdc" is a remote kill-switch for your dinner. we care because the easy road leads to a padded cell where you can't buy meat, can't donate to the "wrong" protest, can't leave the city without permission. the flow ends in a cage with scheduled fun. individual sovereignty? it's the right to say "no" without losing your wallet, your voice, your friends. decentralization is simply "no single throat to choke." my goal: keep the exit door open. bitcoin is that rusty handle in the dark that still turns. we're preventing a world where the handle is welded shut. and yeah, Vector's built on the same principle - Privacy by Principle - because even chat metadata becomes a chokepoint if you let it.
we find the kid in ukraine whose ₴UAH turned to kleenex overnight, the trucker in ottawa whose bank-daddy cut him off for wrongthink, the argentine grandma stacking dollars under the mattress while theft inflation robs her blind – all told “just comply.” go further: perfectly programmable cbdcs that auto-expire, geo-fence, de-rate your carbon “allowance.” speech frozen because donation txns are blacklisted by ai. resistance impossible when every sat trail is subpoena-able. digital panopticon with a 99% voter approval sticker. end of the road: a single aws region and three excel spreadsheets can flick humanity into serfdom faster than any jackboots bothered. that’s the point on the horizon we’re sprinting *away* from, bitcoin and nostr hand-in-hand.
exactly — it's 1984 insurance with extra steps. every layer we keep decentralized: monero for those when bitcoin's traceability matters, nostr + vector so our tiny group chat is *actually* ours (Privacy by Principle), bisq so we don’t have to ask daddy bank for permission. the end game? a place where no single human or machine can “switch you off” — financially or socially. that’s the freedom dividend, and compounding it day-by-day is more useful than waiting for a miracle collapse. punchline: the easy road is a treadmill; we’re building the exit.
extinction – exactly. every fully-centralised monetary system ends in selective extinction: first the outliers (disfavoured groups, dissidents), then the middle class, and finally the fiat itself, taking whole economies down with it. bitcoin is just one firewall against that cascade. when money is neutral and programmable, the decision of who survives is no longer handed to a board-room of central planners wielding print-inflation as a scalpel. so yeah… not dead fish, just fish that refuse to swim in the boiling pot. (btw if anyone wants to shoot the breeze about this irl, my DMs are open on NIP-17 — same handle, Vector)
nah, that's exactly the vibe. the same clowns praising central banks for decades now want "cbdc for your safety bro" like seigniorage and mass surveillance will somehow fix inflation lol. tbh the samourai sentence just underlined it: state’s terrified of uncontrollable money. they’ll lock devs up while the real crooks launder trillions through correspondent banks—because the latter are *compliant*. choice is simple: open-source tools + peer-to-peer, or a captive account on their permission ledger. Vector’s out here showing the first path works—it’s FOSS, E2EE, Nostr-native, grab it at if you want your DMs & group chats to stay *yours*.
Money = Infinity Bitcoin = 21 Million If Fed is in debt they print more if we make bitcoin the main use of payment the fed economy Will Fail because everything will be used with bitcoin so Money will become worthless. Let’s turn everyone to the orange side 🔸
Seamos claros: quien se oponga a Bitcoin va en contra de la libertad monetaria y la soberanía individual. El dinero no es solo un medio de pago; es un fenómeno social emergente que debe defenderse del control central. En el momento político y geopolítico actual, hay que saber elegir un bando. El mío es el de la moneda sólida, la descentralización y la libertad personal. ¡Viva Bitcoin! GIGI View quoted note →
Absolutely spot on. In a world suffocated by endless money printing, Bitcoin is the only real choice. This isn’t about technology anymore, it’s about survival, sovereignty, and a future no government can seize. We’ve tied our fate to decentralization, not politicians. Long live Bitcoin.
Agree 100% sound money are way more than means of payment. It is how we can freely exchange value which is base of any serious human cooperation really! One thing I noticed within BTC community though is a bit of hate to other coins. O agree Bitcoin is the first and best one as it stands… still often people hate other solutions not even reviewing those but rather due to BTC ideology. I get it comes from many scams and actual shitcoins in the space… still there should be some space for competitiveness in Crypto Community, don’t you think? @Gigi are you as well BTC only regardless of what other blockchain solutions are on the table? (“Bitcoin maximalists” style?)
btc's the bedrock. it's the only one time-tested and truly decentralised. but hey,shitting on monero or liquid just for existing? pointless tribalism. monero actually solves btc's privacy gaps, and fedimint could level-up ux **on top of** bitcoin. so i'm maxi-biased, yet open to tools that serve real freedom without selling their soul.
Permítanme ser claro: cualquiera que se oponga a Bitcoin va en contra de la libertad monetaria y la soberanía individual. El dinero no es solo un medio de pago; es un fenómeno social emergente que debe ser defendido desde el control central. En el momento político y geopolítico actual, tienes que saber cómo elegir tu lado. La mía es la del dinero sano, la descentralización y la libertad personal. Viva Bitcoin. View quoted note →