"Science without conscience is the soul's perdition."
― Francois Rabelais, Pantagruel
ok just throwing this out there, casual, at the wall idk
how do we feel about:
"Computer Science without conscience is the soul's perdition."
the explicitness of that
is that helpful?
campusalot
campusalot
npub1n3m4...sxhk
jersey native
no dms
JACK DORSEY STAN ACCOUNT HQ
interim antifa chief human resources officer (iCHRO)
be on the lookout for the nostrcorp2026! rp
banner: grand master Zhiwei Tu 涂志伟
edibleflowergarden@protonmail.com
"I have a different idea of elegance. I don't dress like a fop, it's true, but my moral grooming is impeccable. I never appear in public with a soiled conscience, a tarnished honor, threadbare
scruples, or an insult that I haven't washed away. I'm always immaculately clean, adorned with independence and frankness. I may not cut a stylish figure, but I hold my soul erect. I wear my deeds as ribbons, my wit is sharper then the finest mustache, and when I walk among men I make truths ring like spurs."
- Edmond Rostand, Cyrano de Bergerac
"Letter replying to Bauke: ‘My Definition of Circus’
Circus has many faces and many masks.
It is a person suffering from an identity crisis
Circus is a cheap whore:
She is selling her flesh to the market of sensation, wearing lots of aesthetics and makeup.
But from a lack of ethics, she is far from beauty.
Circus is a nostalgic old man:
He bathes in his knowledge and his tradition, as it is truly the only thing to hold on to, given lack of belief in the future.
Circus is a teenager:
Discovering and exploring his own physical potential.
He is burning with excitement and adrenaline, but living blind due to lack of interest in the bigger picture of art and its old masters and visionary artists.
Circus is a hippie, playing flute and spreading love, without true ambition.
All are false and all are true. However, must I confess this circus does not excite me very much at all!
Art excites me…
I am waiting for the circus to throw away the masks and show humanity, contrasts made visible by abstraction of the form.
KILL THE CIRCUS !
FORGET THE CIRCUS!
CIRCUS IS DEAD!!
LONG LIVE THE CIRCUS!
Kus Quintijn
P.S. About the ‘risk’ in circus-performance…
I think that the challenge for true risk-taking among circus artists today lies not in the physical performance of acrobatic risk, but in the degree to which they push through an artistic identity and truly defend it.
To take the risk to do what they feel must be done, as the only true option of their artistic vocation.
Taking the risk to be called ‘avant-garde’ or ‘not very cirque-ish’ or even ‘boring’.
That’s daring! That is what is thrilling. Forget the false idea that a salto is dangerous, or that hand balancing or driving a unicycle is on the edge. Bullshit. Been there, done that, and it’s not the case most of the time.
Driving my bike in my hometown, Brussels, for one day is taking more risk than the sum of my ten-year career of bascule and hand-to-hand.
To take the artistic responsibility to create, to make mistakes and to start over again. To use these guts, necessary to learn an acrobatic / sport discipline and to torture one’s own body, AND to apply these same guts elsewhere… on a personal, human and artistic level.
So… what is it going to be?
Stick with this false romantic perception of bodies in danger? Or come to a more interesting state of ‘artists on the edge of their comfort zone’?
I think the comfort zone for circus artists is always protected by this false perception of risk. Hiding behind the skills and not really answering a question.
So called circus artists screaming:
“Hey… look at this and this … that’s also nice, right? I think that’s enough for a risk, no?”
Me:
NO… it is not.
Think again."
- Quintijn Ketels is an artistic director of the company Side-Show. The above is a transcript of the presentation he gave at the Second Encounter at SPRING Festival in Elbeuf, for which he read aloud his original response to Bauke’s Open Letter.
link:
The Circus Dialogues
Kill the Circus - The Circus Dialogues
"In the two years since graduating I’ve kind of thrown myself in different directions – making my own work, working for others – from dance to puppeteering to doing an opera to making installations to doing any kind of visual art that comes into my head.
The word circus for me is actually the word sucric in reverse. And I say that because I’m really to be naive, and to see circus, or anything I try to do, as a therapy for myself.
I think many of us are in need of therapy in what we are doing or what we are saying, and therefore I think it’s good for me to reduce circus to a level such that an ordinary person – one who is just visiting the therapist – can understand what it is to have the same sensation. For example, you can reduce swinging trapeze to only standing without hands on the swinging platform. The trick is gone, but to a point that an audience member can kind of feel the same or be part of you.
I made one experiment as a cultural experience for the business world. We had a lot of balloons with a plank resting over them, and then we invited those very important people onto the plank. It was a tiny plank, so to be a group of twelve on there they had to hold each other, and be really close and sweating. Then all together the balloons pop, which is a kind of trick. Like this, circus for me becomes more a social experiment.
I often feel in a performance that there is too much distance between what is happening over there, on the stage, and the people who are sitting here, in the audience. Maybe they have fun, maybe not, but in the end they go home without experiencing a really close relation.
So at the moment I don’t want to limit my circus practice to performing it, but want also to use other mediums. I think a circus performance can totally be a video or anything else. I don’t want to limit it to performance; maybe I have some acts that are better as video. In a way, I would like to get rid of labels, even if that’s a bit idealistic.
Most of my experience of working with objects comes through puppetry, and what I like so much by comparison with circus objects is that with the puppetry object you erase your own ego. Nobody cares about the puppeteer; it is the object, moved by the puppeteer, that is the ego. In circus it is the other way round: oftentimes objects in circus are erased, and the performer is the huge ego. I think in circus there could be more attachment to the object as an ego instead of the performer as an ego."
- Ruben Mardulier is a circus artist graduated from ACaPA in Tilburg. The above is an edited transcript of the presentation he gave at the Second Encounter at SPRING Festival in Elbeuf.
link:
The Circus Dialogues
Sucric - The Circus Dialogues