Your first sentence is blatantly false & is a bias you hold for whatever reason.
Thread
Login to reply
Replies ()
The stress is on the "suddenly" part of it. And you haven't told my you believe it's "false", or what is false about it (especially since it is a question). It seems like you are making assumptions about some hidden meaning to the question, but I could easily be wrong about that.
We all have biases, and I don't mind correcting mine. However, you have provided nothing. If that maintains, then you're just trolling and bluffing. If not, then show your cards.
"When Israel attacks palastine..."
This first sentence bruh,
View quoted note →
Oh, that could easily be wrong since I haven't done a tally. It's not like I trust headlines about wars either. I'm going off of the buzz that's happening today, which was obviously absent before. It's not like there wasn't violence in that region before today (from both sides). Yet we're going to focus on it at this moment in the biggest way possible. My post is about the control of information, not about either side.
Btw, there's no point in trying to debate me about the war, as I disagree with both sides. If you want to say the media portrays things fairly, then I'd like some data.
You're trying to make a point that isn't there, the attacks today we're unprecedented, & extremely brutal - legit the worst day in Israel's history.
Further, I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything - you seem to be trying to convince yourself you're not confused, but you are.
Ah, so that's why you replied with a map. 😉
I'll be replying with another map soon of where we bury all those terrorists so you can buy them flowers.
You can keep thinking that I care about either side of you want to act obtuse.