Spam filters mean there will be less spam.
If you're worried about side effects like centralization of mining or UTXO set bloat then let me know when you're ready to take those problems seriously instead of LARPing about it and nuking OP RETURN limits.
UTXO bloat and mining centralization are *serious issues* in Bitcoin.
You don't get to do absolutely nothing about them for years then invoke them when coming up for convenient excuses for killing datacarriersize.
Mining *is* centralized. There's no amount of bending over we can do relaying the stupidest trash possible around the network appeasing miners and scammers that can roll back the tide there just in the hopes that MARA becomes less motivated to maintain Slipstream.
Where have the serious people gone?
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (4)
Are there any proposed solutions for the bloat of the UTXO set? If spammers attempt to make a UTXO un-spendable with a false receiver address but otherwise follow TX consensus rules, is there a way to stop it? Thanks and love & support what you do!
Nobody answers this, they just ignore the question.
I don't know much about spam filters, but it look like it's only about mempool. Is possible for user to define spam filter in btc core? For example can i create script which not allow in my mempool inscriptions?