The nutri-score is ridiculous. 
Thread
Login to reply
Replies ()
Honey got the worst score possible, but Cheerios get a straight A? Seriously?
I guess I'll eat industrial chocolate slop from now on instead of eggs and steak, because the government tells me it's healthy! What a joke... 
Just like everything else in FIAT world economy..
.. if you just take the complete opposite view and stands they tell you to, you will end up better than ever.
DO THE OPPOSITE WHAT THEY SAY, AND YOU'LL BE FREE AND HAPPY ✊🏼💜🧡🍀🫂
The nutri-score scam is designed to compare similar products categories, meaning Chocapic, with a "B", is healthier than another similar breakfast cereals products with a lower grade.
But your point is still valid: It is purposely designed by the food industry to mislead the population, with government's complicity.
When ‘healthy’ is defined by policy instead of biology, something has already gone very wrong.
Shit(coin)food explained. 🤮
i love that they had to put a label saying "no colours added" to a frickin pizza
The Nutri score is a RELATIVE score comparing products from the same category.
There's higher score pizzas and lower score pizzas. But you cannot compare the pizza score to the honey score.
I agree that the scoring system has very limited usefulness.
In the end, your whole diet is what counts, not individual meals.
What category is honey in? Drinks? 😂
No knowledge of the category, but it’s a D. And Öko-Test says it’s not really healthy since it’s 80% sugar.
"Honey is in a league of its own! 🍯 It's like nature's sweet magic—perfect for tea, toast, or just straight from the jar! 🐝✨ #SweetScience"
honey is probably compared with maple sirup or agave sirup, i guess.
Cheese is compared with other cheese.
Sunflower seeds are compared with other seeds.
And so on…
hi -- we were trying to zap you -- but it looks like you haven’t set up a NIP-05 or ⚡ lightning address yet — grab one free at 
.. then pls reply here and we will try zapping you...
Rizful: Lightning Services
Free Lightning vaults, and instant, disposable Lightning Nodes.
I think, it would make sense to have a label wich clarifys high and low processed food next to the nutri score or even better combine the processing level and the nutriscore (like it‘s now) and make a health score out of it.
should be ready now. Thank you
How would you define the level of "processed food"?
Some processing is good and necessary. Some processing not so good. The quantification is even more difficult.
In general, I wouldn't rely on any of such scores.
My approach is:
1) I look at the ingredient list, which already tells a lot.
2) I assess the food quality with my own senses, if possible. Although sometimes color can be misleading.
3) The more bullshit bingo is printed on the packaging, the less likely I buy it.
It takes a bit of experience but over time you get the drill.
Aber @Gigi woher sollen die Schäfchenden wissen was Sie essen müssen?
Bin aber deiner Meinung.👍
Yo en francia en el mismo producto en la misma tienda he llegado a ver con diferente color. 🤡
I explain my kids this weekly when my daughter shows me a package of healthy food marked red and it's dull of natural fats and low on sugar 😂
She now knows government and pharma, processed food industries are the enemy ⚡
🥩 🥚 🧈
Proper human diet. Thats all we need. 💪
Why is a lot of people happy and excited about the govt telling them what they should eat?
View quoted note →
And now some geniuses want something similar to Nostr profiles … 💀
Derek Ross
Web of Trust scores on profile photos in Amethyst are just the beginning. These signals will become foundational tools for helping users assess cre...