Signal’s Meredith Whittaker on the privacy nightmares that agentic AI introduces.
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (19)
New company tagline: OpenSecret, protector of the digital blood brain barrier
View quoted note →
Signal’s Meredith Whittaker on the privacy nightmares that agentic AI introduces.
View quoted note →
I think of the comparison to a human assistant. The super-wealthy, celebrities, etc, they all certainly have people around them that have root access to their devices, to do all of the kind of "agent" tasks that Meredith describes here. So how do they solve that "trust" problem, and does agentic AI really change the underlying dynamic of this?
Is an agentic AI more or less motivated to misbehave than (say) a hired housekeeper or nanny?
Perhaps self-hosting, or at least "end to end encrypted" AI is the answer here....
is an example of this.

Venice AI
Venice | Private AI for Unlimited Creative Freedom
Try Venice.ai for free. Generate text, images, characters and video using private and unbiased AI.
She seems intelligent
why don't you tell us how you really feel about agentic AI Meredith Whittaker
Kinda hot.
I understand Medusa, in presidential mode.
Signal’s Meredith Whittaker on the privacy nightmares that agentic AI introduces.
View quoted note →
privacy is a human right
Not doing that.
video link is broken, anyone have it ?
Link is working on my end
USE SIGNAL
Beware
Signal’s Meredith Whittaker on the privacy nightmares that agentic AI introduces.
View quoted note →
Meredith’s takes seem to start off pretty normal and then she drops a bomb.
“So your brain can sit in a jar”
💀🧠🤣
View quoted note →
smart
1) self hosted solves half of this
2) using an agent with lightning or cashu with a budget per week or day solves the credit card part.
3) I don't see how you would want an ai agent impersonating you on signal. It's called a not for a reason and signal just needs to make it possible to build them into groups