Web of Trust scores on profile photos in Amethyst are just the beginning. These signals will become foundational tools for helping users assess credibility, reduce spam, and navigate their social graph with more confidence. This is all part of creating your own algorithm. And it's only going to improve from here.
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (106)
Gotta get more wot providers out there. People want this.
Web of Trust scores on profile photos in Amethyst are just the beginning. These signals will become foundational tools for helping users assess credibility, reduce spam, and navigate their social graph with more confidence. This is all part of creating your own algorithm. And it's only going to improve from here.
View quoted note →
I find WoT with no PoW to be entirely deceptive and can be easily gamed by bad actors.
PoW in this context: interacting with nyms long enough to trust them.
So I will politely disagree that it is important.
The beauty of GrapeRank is if that's what you want, then you can do that. Every person can have their own ranking and weights. Add PoW to yours.
I'm too simple for that. π€£π€£π€£
Adding that level of complexity is... Kinda confounding. (Granted, I know zilch about how it works. So I'll shut up now. π€£)
It's gamable if there is a single algorithm mandated by an authority - a single moving target can be gamed. But when you (eventually) have thousands of overlapping moving targets (different algorithms different settings per user) it makes gaming it futile. So the "best" way to game the system is just to do what you normally do - interact. Over time, you'll grow an organic reputation across all those target.
The number is a proxy, just like colors on animals and plants are proxies for their threat level. Human trust always beats computer trust, but the proxy helps in digital spaces when you want to decide who you care to interact with, or even more important - let into your community.
Iβm not on amethyst
Whatβs my score lol
I see you 68.
Where do I see this? I'm on amethyst
whatβs my score
I see you at 70.
is that like a βCβ grade ?
Β―\_(γ)_/Β―
Itβs out of 10,000 so youβre a pleb degen π€·ββοΈ
π
I donβt like the idea of a number on a person.
But thatβs just me.
That's fine. Be your own number generator if you'd prefer that.
Same, it seems very Black Mirror.
π―
Silence! Single digits not allowed to reply.
But if it's your own number ..
Yeah I hate applying anything quantitative to a person.
Some people think bitcoin is evil because βmoney is the root of all evil.β But to them, money means fiat. They donβt realize that the evils of fiat should not be assumed to apply to decentralized money.
Same thing with reputation. Centralized scoring systems are very Black Mirror. But decentralized scoring systems, where scores are personalized rather than global, belong in a different category.
Bitcoin was launched by a means for someone to stay relevant after the hype of social media. It's coming off as a cult culture and will eventually fade to nothing more than Scientology or heavy religious type of control. It will never be mainstream.
The draining of purchasing power is the root of all evil.
Fiat is the devil πΏ
Fiat is seed oils
Btc is beef tallow
Decentralized solutions are scary and counterintuitive because they have opposite effects from their fiat counterparts which have been engrained in most peoples' minds as natural law.
It is not money that is evil. The love of it. βFor the love of money is a root of all kinds of evils.β
They also have the quote wrong.
It's "The love of money is the root of all evil"
I agree βοΈ
I feel like people are just superstitious about this. Philip Sheldrake on the other hand has thought through the issue of digital identity
I'll refrain from judging before I see it but if it's based purely on kind 3 follows its not gonna be optimal
Iβm curious about my score, do you mind please sharing? Iβm in iOS world.
It's 37, but this number is not going to be the same for every person that sees you. It's just for me.
Curious. Thatβs so low!!
I assume thatβs meant to tell you Iβm more likely a bot? A troll? π€·π»ββοΈ
Iβm very much a human, so thereβs that.
Thanks for letting me know though.
i would assume this is because you don't engage and interact with the same people that i do?
this is all still very new and needs a lot more information and tooling.
Thatβs likely what it is.
I need to engage more.
I donβt like this name, but it seems to fit; this looks like a social credit scoring system.
if it was centralized and someone was in control of it, i'd call it that, but since each user is in control of everything, it's not really the same thing.
TouchΓ© π«‘
what about Web of Verification scores ?
I really like a lot how @Coracle does it. Here one can set a minimal WoT combined with a minimal PoW. This allows to see comments of new users still, when they use world of trust.
It is important to not forget about the new users.
But also appreciate a lot the idea to just not show users, which were reported more than 5 times within my follows.
"Interesting perspective! Itβs great to see discussions about balancing new user visibility with community safety. Finding that sweet spot is key! π How do you think we can encourage healthy interactions while keeping the platform welcoming? π€"
I think it is really important to find a way, to check the introductions and asknostr tag from time to time. And when someone sees new users reference them in a note or to quote their notes.
I also would not expect from new users to set a pow. So I really think that the proposal vrom @Vitor Pamplona is one of the best balance. To only filter users, that got reported more often by you and your follows than whatever treshhold one sets.
This is evil.
A sad day for nostrβ¦freedom tech they said
Feels like a way to force us into echo chambers and prevent healthy discussion.
Thank fuck that it's only amethyst.
I'm happy to stop using it.
Vou examinar isso com mais acuidade. Se estiver havendo shadow ban por essa porcaria, vou para outro cliente.
What don't you understand about web of trust?
You have the freedom to use it however you want. It's fucking cool.
We do not care about automated trust. We do not care about spam. We do not care about centralized filtering system. People are different, have different rules and aspects. When standardization kicks in, there is nothing interesting to see anymore.
I'm curious: What do you see as my score?
"45; suspected vibe coder"
(kidding; I'm using today's / latest Amethyst but not seeing these numbers)
I would answer but I can't even see your account on amethyst, apparently I follow too many people that have you muted or something.
Probably. I think most people can't see me. That's why I'm curious.
I can see you on Amethyst
There are always a few rebels. π
I'm not sure where to look for the WoT score 

I think you have to subscribe to a provider.
67
Interesting. It's quite low, but I expected it to be even lower.
Other people could see you much higher. It's not a centralized score.
I know, but I was curious as to what you see, specifically.
Your score will be different for each user. It all depends on which algo they choose.
What do you see?
69 π
At least, it's a funny number. π
Is there a way to use this score in reverse? To find anyone who causes someone else to have a low score?
Sure! It's your algo anyway :)
How do we see this information?
Are you talking about the 0?
Everyone has a 0 even Gigi?


Not only is it ranking everyone at zero.
I also can't see most of the comments on amethyst.
Yakihonne and primal are both showing comments that are hidden on amethyst.
So it's a shadowban?
Because people I follow have some of the other commenters muted and now I can't see those other comments?
So like, to use amethyst I have to unfollow everyone or it just hides content from me?
I'm ok just not using amethyst, I really don't care about the whole ranking situation, but the shadow bans being used against people who are not spammers or scammers is stupid.
It's just forcing people into Echo chambers


Pior que isso estΓ‘ acontecendo comigo tb, mas eu pensei que era por questΓ΅es de relay.
That's relay problems - when notes aren't found initially they may be rendered later, relays may be slow to respond, all sorts of issues happen with nostr infrastructure. Don't worry too much about it, it's just part of the way nostr clients work.
None of this is correct π You're having general Amethyst issues. I can open up Amethyst at any time and only see your notes for example. Why are you censoring me?!?!
Ok now this is getting rediculous.
My following feed on amethyst is full of bots that I don't even follow.
This is so fucking broken.
It's hiding real people and showing me spam bots
This is a lie. You should work harder to troll harder. You clearly don't understand how any of this works and that's okay because it's new and complicated. But that doesn't mean you need to make up claims that don't make sense. It just makes you look like a bad actor.
Just give me my social score already
I can only see half the comments on this note when using amethyst.
Also, all the people I can see are ranked at 0
Lol
Amethyst bringing in client side censorship this early is going to kill their brand before it gets anywhere.
Imagine you're a new user on amethyst, you've followed 15 people and now you can't see 3/4 of nostr because between those 15 people you got 5 mutes on ΒΎ on nostr.
Depends who you follow, maybe you follow 50 before half of nostr disappears
It's just going to force people into echo chambers and prevent nostr growing when new users feel like nostr is just an empty void.
People are going to think nostr has 150 active daily users instead of 15k lol
At least nobody actually uses amethyst as their first client.
But if primal done something like this it would kill nostr, there's be absolutely no new user retention
View quoted note β
I see some dude holding a mic, "what this mofo sellin?" fuck off bald xi jinping!
I didn't vote for this
Web of Trust scores on profile photos in Amethyst are just the beginning. These signals will become foundational tools for helping users assess credibility, reduce spam, and navigate their social graph with more confidence. This is all part of creating your own algorithm. And it's only going to improve from here.
View quoted note →
Apart from censorship making nostr more boring when we can't see half the comments.
I can see ways for this to be misused with bots.
Anyone can set up a bunch of reply bots that reply to new users and get followered by those new users.
That's literally how I found people to follow on here in the beginning, I was following the nostr CEO bot and checking it's replies to find new people.
It doesn't actually matter because it's only amethyst, but if a popular client for new comers did this, someone could really mess with people by exploiting it
That's not how this works at all though.
I don't think scores on the forehead are a good idea. It's objectifying people, as if any algorithm is going to be 100% precise in capturing the very contextual notion of trust.
But they don't have to be shown, they can simply be used to increase signal and decrease noise, magically, and in the background.
View quoted note β
the nostr social credit score. massively benefits long term users and punishes new npubs even if they are legit. our user retention rates are abysmal, isn't this gonna make things worse?
Web of Trust scores on profile photos in Amethyst are just the beginning. These signals will become foundational tools for helping users assess credibility, reduce spam, and navigate their social graph with more confidence. This is all part of creating your own algorithm. And it's only going to improve from here.
View quoted note →
idk, but somehow reading phrases like this rubs me the wrong way. π
Web of Trust scores on profile photos in Amethyst are just the beginning. These signals will become foundational tools for helping users assess credibility, reduce spam, and navigate their social graph with more confidence. This is all part of creating your own algorithm. And it's only going to improve from here.
View quoted note →
β Blueskystr β
Based on what?
There's a wide range of criteria. Whatever you want. Zaps, comments, follows, mutes, literally anything and everything that you want and it can be based on you and your context. It's what you want.
End user sets what their expectations are of a trust worthy user and then the score is compiled?
Essentially. We have our own metrics and weights. What is good for me isn't necessarily good for you.
Gotcha - I was going to try and vibe a trade services app on top of Nostr for fun and was thinking about how the end user could rank a user as trustworthy straight off the start line.
I use amethyst. I updated to the latest version. I don't see any numbers on profile pics. Where can I see thus number?
WoT = Nostr-Score


My #Amethyst client now connects to 1200 relaysβ¦
what?? No dupplicated connection?
Nostr WoT = Freedom Tech Social Score
Google had that at the beginning too and then gradually gave it up. Maybe it's worth looking into why.
Saying "everyone can just accept or reject it" is a bit short sighted, when the most common clients support it and shape their users with these numbers. It'll give the same people even more momentum in the short and medium term. But long term, they'll shoot themselves in the foot. And "the people want it"... who says that what people want is always automatically good? And who are these βpeopleβ anyway? How many are they in percent?
Real freedom tech doesn't need any ranking algorithms at all. It doesn't need algorithms at all.
Web of Trust scores on profile photos in Amethyst are just the beginning. These signals will become foundational tools for helping users assess credibility, reduce spam, and navigate their social graph with more confidence. This is all part of creating your own algorithm. And it's only going to improve from here.
View quoted note →
In case this isn't obvious to everyone yet:
Ultimately, "creating your own algorithm" using WoT scores will be meaningless without the ability to create your own algorithm for calculating WoT scores.
Web of Trust scores on profile photos in Amethyst are just the beginning. These signals will become foundational tools for helping users assess credibility, reduce spam, and navigate their social graph with more confidence. This is all part of creating your own algorithm. And it's only going to improve from here.
View quoted note →
As the 17th most prolific shitposter as deemed by Will's node, I second this message π
That's about right, Mike. I see you as 82. Wild π
Is 82 my ranking or my age? π
ππ
What scores on profile photos in Amethyst? Results are based on what?

