Thread

🛡️
The Bitcoin Core vs Knots debate is framed as “pro-spam” vs “anti-spam.” This is obviously a false dichotomy. Core isn’t “pro-spam” and running Bitcoin Core on your node does not make YOU “pro-spam.” Anyone who frames it as such is either purposefully gaslighting or retarded.

Replies (15)

The debate centers on whether Bitcoin is primarily a monetary network and if it should also serve as an unmoderated data transfer network. If you consider Bitcoin to be a monetary network, then non-monetary data on it can be regarded as spam.
Core v 30 enables more spam, meaning it is pro-spam. Based on your propaganda you are either gaslightnig or retarded. But the truth may be that your close friends like Lopp are spammers and shitcoiners.
BitcoinIsFuture's avatar BitcoinIsFuture
This is the disgusting shitcoin spammers business model. Now they sell message storage on Bitcoin but you can see its capped to 80 Bytes (on OP_RETURN). Do you wonder why? Becuase filters work. Next they want it to 100 KB and start selling distributed storage for CSAM. Its fucking disgusting. image https://poststr.com/
View quoted note →
↩ replying to aeon 📜CTV + CSFS
Bad actor miners like Mara did it but they were forced to stop because nodes delay those transactions and if there are competing blocks the bad actor miners blocks will be rejected. At this point its clear that everyone who support no filters is a shitcoiner who supports spam, scam and shitcoining memes into Bitcoin. The argument that its already possible is BS because runes and ordinals spam can be fixed as well. image
Core isn’t “pro-spam” and running Bitcoin Core on your node does not make YOU “pro-spam.” hahahah really? Did you know what is a Kb and the implication that might occur with 100 of them in an innocent mempool that unaware update to Core 30 ?