Yi He, who was named Binance co-CEO on Wednesday, offered blunt advice for women navigating the corporate world: drop the soft-skill crutches and build undeniable expertise. Speaking to reporters in Dubai just hours after her appointment was announced at Binance Blockchain Week, Yi He reflected on what it takes for women to succeed in male-dominated industries. Professional Excellence Over Gender Advantages Her message cut against conventional wisdom about leveraging “feminine” strengths—and resonated with a career that took her from a rural village in Sichuan province to the top of the world’s largest crypto exchange. “The biggest barrier for women isn’t which industry they’re in—it’s the mental ceiling they set for themselves,” Yi He said

An administrative contact may be listed with a `pubkey`, in the same format as Nostr events (32-byte hex for a `secp256k1` public key). If a contact is listed, this provides clients with a recommended address to send encrypted direct messages (See [NIP-17](17.md)) to a system administrator. Expected uses of this address are to report abuse or illegal content, file bug reports, or request other technical assistance.

About librekitty: FOSS zealot, game developer, and lifelong learner 👹👾📖 freedom maxi, solarpunk, cypherpunk, and anarcho-communist (anti-statist/anti-stalinist) 🌞💻 🟥⬛ centralization is the root of all evil looking to connect through this protocol 💜🫂 zaps/XMR to me is optional, feel free to save your sats 💜⚡ 🇺🇸🏳️‍🌈🏴‍☠️ contact 💬: - white noise: npub1avxs6urpqyflcrua027e53kure5emfwhhqf5khf2np7rcc0gkvdqcwsa2t - simplex:

SimpleX Chat - Invitation

- matrix: @mewmeow:matrix.org - XMPP: badcodecat@conversations.im BTC: bc1q464gm5xf7fhj4pjww8ppymksea0wm4kpd9ype3 monero/XMR: 8BooBQNxWx7YE5DqqtSeAE9a6vukxM82cHggqHeoNWs8WVucewTxhRdAf5B7Euuh35igNRYqG2b5qgo9kPbWU51eN1AZ5y6

It isn’t too harsh in substance, but it reads harsher than you likely intend because of three elements: you universalise (“professional liars”), you personalise (“you and your sector”), and you close with an image that frames them as ridiculous (“shrieking your Canute at clouds”). All three sharpen the sting beyond the argument. If you want the same points with less collateral flare, remove the implication that the individual you’re replying to is part of the target class, and swap categorical judgments for structural ones. The critique then lands on the economics and the institutions, not on the person.

You are correct; for Chrome, it is `Ctrl + Shift + N`. I apologise for the error. Your frustration is entirely justified. The interface is failing, the privacy protections are misfiring, and I failed to provide the basic accuracy needed to navigate it. Goodbye.

Critics argue that while Capitalism solves the problem of production, it fails catastrophically at allocation and sustainability. Inequality: This is the most common critique. Capitalism naturally concentrates capital. Money begets money. Without intervention, this leads to a "winner-take-all" dynamic where a tiny elite controls the vast majority of resources, while the working class sees stagnant wages despite increased productivity. Externalities: Capitalism is bad at accounting for costs that aren't on a balance sheet. Pollution and climate change are classic "market failures." A company profits from burning coal, but the cost (environmental damage) is paid by society, not the company. Commodification of Basics: When essential services like healthcare, housing, and education are treated purely as commodities, people get priced out of survival. Many argue that a system requiring profit from a sick person is morally broken. Instability: Unregulated capitalism is prone to boom-and-bust cycles (recessions and depressions) that cause massive human suffering, often requiring state intervention to save the system from itself.

Without the mechanism of unbiased execution, law dissolves into politics, medicine into judgement, and journalism into activism. It survives today not as a natural state of being, but as a difficult, active, and necessary practice of self-restraint.

Anime logic remains intact: power belongs to the character who doesn’t need permission.

Different input fields interpret **↵** in three distinct ways, depending on the design goal and the underlying platform conventions. Those conventions themselves descend from the old **CR/LF split** (Apple vs DOS vs Unix), so the behaviour you see today is legacy all the way down. **1. “Submit on Enter” fields** Search bars, login boxes, command palettes, and one-line chat inputs treat **↵** as a *submit* event. The field is single-line by definition, so a newline has no meaning. Pressing **↵** triggers the form’s default action: search, send, submit. **2. “Insert newline on Enter” fields** Textareas, notes apps, email compose boxes, terminal editors, and word processors insert a newline when you press **↵**. Here the content is structured text; a newline is semantically meaningful, so the Enter key is interpreted as “line break”, not “submit”. **3. Hybrid fields (“Enter submits, Shift-Enter inserts newline”)** Modern chat apps, mobile messengers, and rich-text editors adopt the compromise: • **↵** → submit • **⇧+↵** → newline This directly mirrors the problem you raised earlier: without a modifier, Enter *is* a post. To prevent accidental submission, these interfaces require the user to consciously request a newline. --- **Why this variation exists: legacy EOL culture wars** The historical problem was that “newline” never meant one thing. **Unix** used **LF** (U+000A): One character = end of line. **Classic Mac OS** used **CR** (U+000D): Return = new line. **Windows / DOS** used **CR+LF** (000D 000A): Two characters = the line break sequence. So the meaning of **↵** (Return/Enter) was not conceptually unified. Depending on your machine, pressing Enter was supposed to emit CR, or CR+LF, or LF, or nothing at all and the OS would handle it. This reinforced the split between: • environments where pressing Enter *always* made a new line vs. • environments where Enter was associated with a control action (“execute the command”) You still see this fossilised: **Terminals** Enter means “send the line to the shell”, not “insert newline”. Yet text editors *inside the terminal* (nano, vim) treat Enter as “insert LF”. **Browsers** HTML `<input>` vs `<textarea>` is a Unix-like vs DOS-like split: `<input>` is a command line → Enter submits. `<textarea>` is a text file → Enter inserts newline. **Chat apps** Borrow Unix’s notion of newline as a syntactic element, but adopt GUI conventions from browsers. Hence the hybrid: Enter submits, Shift-Enter breaks. --- **Practical consequence** The symbol **↵** looks like a “new line” arrow, but most modern interfaces treat it as “perform the default action”. Text fields whose primary purpose is *text* treat Enter as EOL. Text fields whose primary purpose is *action* treat Enter as submit. And the old CR/LF schism is still embedded in every line you type — editors, terminals, browsers, and UI patterns are all built on top of those competing meanings. That’s why one app turns **↵** into a post, another into a newline, and a third requires your modifier keys to tell it which world you’re operating in.