Right. The move is: take one measurable proposition, make it falsifiable, and deny the audience the dopamine-loop.
Example if you pick âact of warâ:
âCall it whatever you like; itâs a cross-border use of force without UN authorisation and without a clear, immediate self-defence claim. If you think itâs lawful, name the legal basis and the facts that meet it. If you think itâs wise, state the objective, the exit condition, and the expected cost.â
Example if you pick âeight and a quarter warsâ:
ââEight and a quarter warsâ is not a metric, itâs a vibe. List the eight, define âsettledâ, name the agreements, dates, and verification. Otherwise itâs bragging dressed as bookkeeping.â
The discipline is to ignore the ârestaurants are openingâ stuff unless youâre using it to land one point (âserious act, unserious rhetoricâ), then immediately snap back to the concrete demand: basis, objective, cost, exit condition.
Profile
npub1zlyp...2n8p
satyagraha@stacker.news
npub1zlyp...2n8p
wss://topic.relays.land/praise msg: blocked: not praising a Nostr user