THE PARADOX OF THE SHARED SELF: WE LIVE IN THE AGE OF TOTAL TRANSPARENCY BUT UNFINDABLE PRIVACY He wakes up every morning in a world that is, simultaneously, a bustling Renaissance piazza and a panopticon of polished glass. His alarm, a personal oracle that knows his sleepy rhythms, does not ring: it vibrates with an algorithmic gentleness, calculated to interrupt REM sleep at the optimal moment, not for him, but for his digital calendar. The first gesture, ancestral, is no longer to rub his eyes but to grasp that rectangle of light, that portal to the outside which is, equally, a mirror reflecting a meticulously curated image of himself. It is a modern act of faith. Faith in an invisible connection, in an ethereal cloud that guards his most banal secrets and his deepest fears. He scrolls a finger across the screen. Every scroll is a signature, a tiny concession. The news presented to him is not the product of chance or a distant editorial choice; it is the product of an evolving portrait, a digital ghost composed of his past likes, his three-second hesitations on a video, his midnight impulse buys. His world narrows and expands based on what a set of equations determines to be his "identity." He reads about a climate crisis a thousand kilometers away and, immediately after, sees an ad for a stainless-steel water bottle, "eco-friendly." The coincidence is an illusion. It is the market speaking the language of anxiety, fluent and persuasive. He works, communicates, loves through screens. His words, typed in haste, are dissociated from his voice, from his body language, from the uncertain glint in his eyes when he lies. They become pure data, to be analyzed, translated, stored. An algorithm peers over his shoulder, not to judge the content of his prose, but to grasp the sentiment hidden between the lines, the phlegm of a comma, the enthusiasm of an exclamation point. It offers him, in return, spell checks and emoji suggestions. A Faustian pact of disconcerting banality: we surrender fragments of our soul in exchange for sublime convenience. Then, at times, doubt arrives. A static shock in the digital fog. Who owns that ghost he has created? That version of himself so dazzling and performative on social media, that other one so meticulous and productive on work email, that last, dark one, searching for medical diagnoses at one in the morning? Is it me, he wonders, or am I what the system needs me to be to maximize engagement, productivity, consumption? His identity has become an asset, a commodity traded on the stock market by opaque entities whose only sacred text is the quarterly report. Privacy, then, is no longer simply the right to be left alone. That battle is, perhaps, already lost. It has become something more radical, more fundamental: it is the right to human opacity. The right to be inconsistent, to have dark and unshared thoughts, to make mistakes without them being archived in a perpetual register, to evolve without one's past version being used as a weapon against you. It is the right not to be completely decipherable, even to ourselves. Yet, in this apparent dystopia, lies a paradox of hope. Never before have we had the tools to connect with like-minded people in every corner of the globe, to organize dissent, to share knowledge that challenges the powers that be. The very technology that chains us can become our crowbar. Surveillance can be overturned, the powerful put under the spotlight of digital scrutiny, their secrets brought to light by the connected crowd. The future, therefore, is not written. It is a battle fought every day with every click, with every download choice, with every question we refuse to ask a voice assistant. It is the conscious choice to turn off the camera, to use a search engine that does not profile, to read news from a source that does not flatter us but challenges us. It is a daily act of resistance, quiet, but profoundly revolutionary. It is not about turning off the devices and returning to an idealized past. It is about reclaiming self-ownership, reaffirming, in a world that wants to make us transparent, the beautiful and necessary mystery of being human. — ✦ — 🦅 Cheyenne Isa ₿ 🦅

Revolt is the cryptographic whisper becoming a shout. Bitcoin is the pickaxe dismantling central banks' walls—a tool of financial disobedience in an age of monetary surveillance. Born from the ashes of 2008, it transforms distrust into architecture: each block a brick in the fortress of digital resistance. It does not ask permission but proves another system is possible.

The world is nothing more than an object of which man wants to be the subject. Modern technology consecrates the reign of the "apparatus," of this Gestell which tends to subject everything that exists to the sole principle of reason. By downgrading all inner life, by replacing meditative life with calculating life, it devastates the world and turns it into a desert. Alain de Benoist

"You have made us for yourself, O Lord, and our heart is restless until it rests in you." — Saint Augustine of Hippo

The Dark Prison of One's Own Certainties: When Sight is Not Enough In an era saturated with information and conflicting viewpoints, there exists a human paradox as ancient as it is dangerous: the self-imposition of a voluntary blindness. It is not the physical lack of sight, but a far more insidious clouding of the intellect and spirit. It is the condition of those who, clinging with fierce determination to their immediate convictions, to the fleeting sensations of a single moment in their existence, erect around themselves an impenetrable wall. This wall is not made of bricks and mortar, but of unspoken prejudices and a voluntary deafness towards any voice that resonates outside the familiar choir. Imagine a man in a room full of mirrors. Every surface reflects only his image, from every possible angle, in an infinite, claustrophobic echo of himself. His fears, his insecurities, his truths acquired without effort are bounced back to him as the only possible reality. The outside, the world beyond the room, becomes an indistinct background noise, a potential threat to the claustrophobic perfection he has built for himself. This is the effect of intellectual isolation. Conviction becomes dogma, the momentary sensation fossilizes into absolute truth, and confrontation with the other—with the different, with the critic, with the one who could offer a different lens—is perceived not as an opportunity for growth, but as an act of aggression against one's own identity. History, that great and often ignored teacher, is a vast catalog of tragedies born from this very blindness. Kings and generals, blinded by hubris, led entire nations into the abyss because they were surrounded by courtiers whose only task was to nod in agreement. Ideologues, certain of the purity of their abstractions, trampled real, complex humanity in the name of a radiant future that never arrived. This is not an evil confined to the powerful. It is a daily temptation for every one of us. How many personal relationships have shipwrecked on the rock of the inability to put oneself in another's shoes? How many professional opportunities have vanished due to the refusal to consider an innovative perspective? The way out of this self-constructed prison is not a simple technique, but an act of profound intellectual humility. It is the courage to admit that one's own sight might be partial, clouded, or simply unfit to focus on a problem in its entirety. It means actively seeking out, not with fear but with curiosity, those who think in diametrically opposite ways. Not necessarily to be converted, but to test the solidity of one's own arguments, to challenge one's assumptions, to enrich the map of reality with the territories we would never have explored alone. In the end, true blindness is not about not seeing. It is about refusing to see more. It is preferring the reassuring comfort of familiar darkness to the blinding, and sometimes uncomfortable, light of a broader truth. The richest man is not the one who possesses all the answers, but the one who, aware of the vastness of the questions, never stops searching for new eyes through which to view the world. — ✦ — 🦅 Cheyenne Isa ₿ 🦅

Build your character day by day with courageous choices, cultivate the garden of your mind with gratitude, and make your shadow a shelter for those in need: humanity will outlast artificial intelligence when it defeats indifference. — ✦ — 🦅 Cheyenne Isa ₿ 🦅

Proper sketchy. View quoted note →