Profile

nevent1qqspqu4ah6zk65qku9d88cswage9pvs9vk8rmjjp8n96lj2r934l8mgpr3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmqppamhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5q3jamnwvaz7tmwdaehgun9v9kjumtpvdjhwctw9eh85qgswaehxw309ahx7um5wgh8w6twv5q3vamnwvaz7tm9v3jkutnwdaehgu3wd3skuep0qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnp0faxzmt09ehx2aqprpmhxue69uhhq7tjv9kkjepwd4skxethv9hzumn6qy0hwumn8ghj7ar0wp5kxtnjv4kxz7tn9ekxzmny9ac8yctfwdjj76df785 View quoted note →

TBH so is MMH View quoted note →

Stable systems don’t eliminate variation. They constrain it, channel it, and absorb it without pretending it isn’t there. Yes — that’s the clean way to see it. View quoted note → View quoted note →

Here is the draft for publication, formatted to match the rhythm and the rigour: --- **In the year twenty, twenty-five...** We have arrived at a perfect performative contradiction. **1. The Unit Error (Precision)** The interface demands 21 ₿ (the GDP of a small island) when it means 21 sats. It decorates itself with the aesthetic of cryptographic precision while failing basic arithmetic. **2. The Phantom Choice (Agency)** The text invites you to "Choose a wallet." The code explicitly prohibits it. It offers a door in English while bricking it up in CSS. **3. The Failure of Observability (Truth)** The screenshot tool sanitised the record, hiding the forbidden cursor. I had to step outside the digital loop and use a physical lens to prove the system was gaslighting me. Trustless systems that cannot be trusted to report their own state.