🔍 Reproducibility Verified: @SeedSigner v0.8.6 ✅ We independently rebuilt the image for Raspberry Pi Zero 1.3 and confirmed a bit-for-bit match with the official release. This strengthens trust in SeedSigner’s transparency and security. 🔗

WalletScrutiny

SeedSigner

Review of SeedSigner (verdict: sourceavailable)

#Bitcoin

This is actually a job in the Philippines. They pay "coconut climbers" about 2 PHP per coconut they bring down. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GucPx8JWcAAJsQU?format=jpg&name=small

@BitBananaApp v0.9.6 is reproducible! ✅ Our analysis confirms the Play Store version matches the public source, with expected benign differences. Transparency you can verify. Full report: @WalletScrutiny

WalletScrutiny

BitBanana: Bitcoin & Lightning

Review of BitBanana: Bitcoin & Lightning (verdict: sourceavailable)

#Bitcoin #Android #ReproducibleBuilds #OpenSource

It would actually benefit Mixin Messenger's Users, if their communications were not misleading. Image 1 appears to show that the desktop app has a "crypto wallet" Image 2 is the documentation - which you'll only read if you're a guy like me. Otherwise, you would be given the run around to install the desktop app, then the mobile app - which is needed to run the desktop app - before realizing that the desktop app does not have a wallet! https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GuStoluXkAAKhlz?format=jpg&name=large https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GuStx2jW0AAarP9?format=png&name=900x900

@SparrowWallet v2.2.3 for Win is reproducible. ✅ This provides the highest level of assurance that the official release is built from the public source code, without modification. Full report:

WalletScrutiny

Build Verifier Page

#SparrowWallet #Bitcoin #ReproducibleBuilds #Security

Here is my finalized report for cash.p.terminal (Pirate Cash Android v0.42.2) cc: @WalletScrutiny

WalletScrutiny

Build Verifier Page

Recommendations for @PirateCash_NET * To align with standard reproducibility verification practices, we recommend that the specific git commit used to build the Google Play release artifact be clearly identified with a corresponding version tag (e.g., `v0.42.2`) in the repo.

🚿⚡ Can you generate electricity from municipal water pressure? Yes — it’s called in-pipe hydropower. I did the math: 💧 A typical household tap at 60 psi and 10 liters/min can theoretically generate: 🔋 ~67 watts of power 🛠️ Realistically: ~30 watts usable (50% efficiency) Sounds cool, right? But there’s a catch: ❗ It only works while water is flowing (shower, faucet, etc.) ❗ You could restrict your water pressure ✅ But yes — it can power a light or sensor in the right setup 🌍 Cities like Portland, Oregon use this to generate electricity from water mains! Ha!

If you have 5,000 liters of water stored 30 feet high, you can get: ➡️ ~124 watt-hours of potential energy ➡️ But with 50% efficiency (real-world losses), you only get ~62 watt-hours That’s enough to: 🔋 Fully charge a laptop once 💡 Power a 10W light for ~6 hours 📶 Run a Wi-Fi router for 3–4 hours To power a 50W laptop for 8 hours (400Wh), you’d need: 💦 ~32,000 liters of water falling from 30 feet every day

🎯 Assumptions: Laptop power usage: ~50 watts (moderate usage) Time: 8 hours Required energy: 50 W×8 hrs=400 Wh/day50 \text{ W} \times 8 \text{ hrs} = \boxed{400 \text{ Wh/day}}50 W×8 hrs=400 Wh/day​ 💧 Let’s reverse-engineer how much water is needed from a 30 ft (~9.14 m) drop: We’ll use: E=m⋅g⋅h⇒m=Eg⋅hE = m \cdot g \cdot h \Rightarrow m = \frac{E}{g \cdot h}E=m⋅g⋅h⇒m=g⋅hE​ Where: EEE = 400 Wh × 3600 = 1,440,000 joules g=9.81g = 9.81g=9.81, h=9.14h = 9.14h=9.14 m=1,440,0009.81⋅9.14≈16,113 kg (liters)m = \frac{1,440,000}{9.81 \cdot 9.14} ≈ \boxed{16,113 \text{ kg (liters)}}m=9.81⋅9.141,440,000​≈16,113 kg (liters)​ ⚠️ Adjust for 50% Efficiency: 16,113×2= 32,226 liters/day16,113 \times 2 = \boxed{~32,226 \text{ liters/day}}16,113×2= 32,226 liters/day​ ✅ Final Answer: To power a 50W laptop for 8 hours/day using only water falling from 30 ft, you’d need: ~32,000 liters per day That’s about 32 large water drums (200L) falling from that height daily