Thread

Main reflection every time I go to DC: It is astonishing how much damage the term β€œcrypto” has done as a one size fits all category The worst altcoin scam promoters are lumped in THE SAME meetings and treated with the same cordiality with Bitcoin miners and stablecoin issuers. All the time. Congressmen and women scammed by SBF are weary of β€œcrypto” - and they are right! We need to be specific β€œCrypto council” type constructs are silly. Why should Bitcoin miners have to share a table and discuss fart coin? Completely unrelated to what they do Huge respect to BPI for pushing in this direction, their name alone means and does a lot There should be Bitcoin meetings, legislation, working groups etc which exclude affinity scammers or anyone not working on Bitcoin

Replies (18)

Please don't include stablecoins with bitcoin. They are crypto and arguably the worst crypto. 100% of inflation risk of fiat. 100% of key management hassle and online security risk of bitcoin. Take your crypto portion and split it into its 2 component parts. Keep the counterparty rug risk discard the miniscule chance that you bought a winning lottery ticket. On top of that every argument for stablecoins has to start with a presumption of some validity of fiat. Even when I was new and ill informed enough to be into crypto I knew better than to ever touch stablecoins.