Thread
Login to reply
Replies ()
“Ask not what your country can do for yourself, ask what you can do for your country.”
Et tout citoyen se devait de mettre cela dans son *crâne* quelque soit le pays où il réside . La clé a toujours là m'est avis idem lorsqu'il s'agit dans un cercle amical voire parental ..
There’s no way that man wasn’t assassinated by the government.
If he only had a nephew to run as president these days…
We all know the conscious that is.
I’m all for it, just incredibly worried his safety.
If only his nephew wasn't concerned with organizing labor
As long as he is not riding in a cabrio during a parade, he’ll be good 💜
L'histoire *américaine * , et la machine très hollywwodienne propagandiste d'une époque sans oublier toutes les structures pas trop *orthodoxes* qu'ils ont créés durant cette époque et post guerres mondiales qui perdurent depuis bouleversant notre Monde de manière innommable , ce que ne voulaient guère certains des pères Fondateurs des Etats-Unis .
Cela ne ferait que confirmer une part de malédiction familiale véhiculée par certains concernant *les Kennedy * pour en faire encore des *films* très US
😂
I grew up researching all these speeches. From regan to Ike. It’s amazing to me that it took so long for the masses to really take in what they were saying
There is a reason they eliminated him, and Bobby. Ask yourself why, I mean it made Watergate look like a joke and the CIA has only learned on thing, we wont riot like the French.
We need leaders like this again.
Yes just like Trump backed by bitcoin ⚡⚡
Hey Jack, you’re a real cool dude
He got what he deserved, for what he did to Marilyn.
Oh, my bad, & Jackie too.
Politicians won’t save us.
Agree
may US
agreed.
policy not politicians should be the focus. humans interested in promoting solid policy naturally gravitate toward one another. politician or private citizen makes no difference. especially now.
running for anything is kinda stakeholdery.
Jack agrees
The former president of the United States, talented and capable, just wanted to take back control of the dollar to the US government, and was murdered by Deep State.
Kennedy was a righteous president who opposed communism. At that time, the United States was in the Cold War with the former Soviet Union, and its policy towards China was to contain and not isolate.
Cela vient un peu d'un certain paranoïa développé après les 2 guerres ( Truman y était un grand acteur.. moins que Roosevelt entre autre )
Truman, the bastard former president of the United States, supported the evil CCP to rule China, causing the Chinese people to be enslaved by the CCP until now, and all ancient Chinese civilization and culture have been ruined and destroyed by the CCP. Only Japan retains ancient Chinese culture and civilization.
In 1961, Kennedy, then president, wanted to establish diplomatic relations with China, asked people to inquire about the hunger situation in China, and wanted to save the Chinese.
The United States in the 1960s was already a developed country.
Judging from historical events, the U.S.is the friendliest to the Chinese. The United States has always helped the Chinese.
Since the Japanese war of aggression against China, the United States has always helped the Chinese. Without the help of the United States, China would have become Japan long ago.
It was Kennedy's flexible and friendly policy towards China in the early stage that led to the "ice-breaking trip" of the 37th President of the United States Nixon's visit to China in 1972.
It was my father who said that President Kennedy sent food to save the Chinese people. At that time, Mao Zedong refused to accept the aid from the US government, resulting in the death of 96 million people.
Evil the CCP.
In China from 2020 to 2022, the covid virus caused tens of millions of deaths due to the closure of cities and communities, and the CCP will not announce it. History is written by the people.
Sooner or later the death toll from covid will be announced in China.
we do not all define peace in the same way - social prosperity is not tranquil, but it brings security and vibrancy in its robustness. this is often messy and loud. but it is not dangerous. when the definition of danger is adjusted toward people believing any disagreement is a threat to "peace" discussion ceases, policy stalls, and innovation vaults in all ways which are considered threatening. i'm a liberal and a democrat because i believe policy should be concrete and applicable, not simply discursive and theoretical. actualisation is true progress. talking about what happened and why it was "dangerous" ad nauseam does nothing but stoke fear.