There you have it. Knots 20250903 is now the most common node version.
Thread
Login to reply
Replies ()
The plebs have spoken
Core proponents assured us this wouldn’t happen. Couldn’t happen. That your node doesn’t matter. It does.
Core v30 proponents assured us this wouldn’t happen. Couldn’t happen. That your node doesn’t matter. It does.
View quoted note →
!!!!
View quoted note →
Amazing. It’s surprising to me that there are only 3,000 people out there saving the world. Out of 8 billion.
It kinda looks like core is the most common
It's not "knots vs core" it is core-v30 vs everything else.
Would it be a success if knots were 100% of nodes?
Yes
No.
You need100% Miners to filter
Only temporarily. Even Luke supports multiple well maintained implementations. Right now there’s only one; Knots.
If the network was 100% Knots and miners continued to include spam they would be risking being rugged and going bankrupt.
Core is clearly the most common with a count of around 14’000 vs 5’000 knots.
Yes, if you add up all Core versions and all Knots versions. But the single most common version is Knots 20250903.
Core-v30 is the one upcoming that is making the change.
All current mainline nodes use an op_return filter.
this is the first time in bitcoin's history that an alternative client reached 20%. This exceeds the 15% of the UASF.
Hey man i see you are Swiss. Do you have some feedback on why 50.30% of Sesia voted yes to the digital ID?
As an external I thought you guys would have surely voted no…
The thing to watch is if people running older versions of Core upgrade to Core v30 or Knots. Anyone who does the work to understand the difference that Knots = “Bitcoin is money”, vs. Core v30 = “Bitcoin is easy storage of large amounts of non-financial data on nodes plus also money” is likely to see through the ad-hominem attacks and FUD (from both sides) and choose Knots.
No real feedback other than it was a referendum, which is good, and a very close call.
At least it was decided the right way.
I think this is a perspective where you perhaps have not extrapolated deeply enough. Some people run older nodes of core because they choose to for very specific reasons.
Ah so you are also in favour of digital ID, my bad then
I would have probably voted against
Sorry then I misunderstood when you said “at least it was decided the right way”, I get now you were referring to the referendum
The plebs have spoken developers
View quoted note →
Where did this come from. How can I monitor this?
Wow!!!! Nice!
Basic math says that 20% a majority is not
It’s the rate of change that’s been impressive. Of the people changing their node version recently, most have decided to move to Knots.
Let’s keep this momentum going - as more people understand that Knots means Bitcoin is money; Core v30 means Bitcoin is money and also easy free data storage on nodes; and Core < v30 means Bitcoin is money and also inscriptions and runes stored on nodes; I think they will upgrade from older versions of Core to Knots. I think most of us are here because we believe in Bitcoin as money and want all the other non-financial “innovation” to happen elsewhere like Ethereum.
Most common version, NOT to be confused with most common software, …which is still core.
Core30 sucks
Core 30 specifically? Yes I think it’s a bad idea rn.
Not for long it appears
And you wonder whats wrong with Bitcoin and the community 😂
The implementation I run has less than 5%.
View quoted note →
A big story. Something I am guilty of not paying enough attention to
I’ve been working on the assumption that fucking with consensus is really hard
This proves that
Plenty of incentive aligned legends out there fighting my corner
Lots of salty tears and cope in the comments 😂
That’s the real ATH.
View quoted note →
Our nodes matter! Keep up the sprit brothers. Bitcoin is money, let's use it like that and be stewards of the networks.
I count nearly 70% core nodes
Where is the data from? Can you trust the statistics? I mean, how many nodes are using tor?
Don’t forget:
uaspoof=1