Gloria Zhao is anti-Bitcoin maximalism and pro-NTF spam. She is a spam shitcoiner.
Core devs are compromised. Adam Back is compromised. All of them are spammer cucks to the bad actors like Jameson Slopp, Shinobi, shitcoinmagazine, Casey Rodarmor, Citrea and Chainway shitcoiners lab and and so on. Shitcoiners really likes Core v30 💩💩💩
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (28)
This shows what kind of spammer she is.. How did she even become the lead maintainer?!
This is how Gloria Zhao became Core lead maintainer.
And this is what Compromised Core devs did.
View quoted note →
Is she able to make any coherent sentence?
: )), like, kind of, like, you know ...
Here some of the shitcoiners who like and run Core v30 ... 💩💩💩
The core dev team has clearly been coopted.
When things don’t add up over and over it’s because you’re being gaslit.
—strawman arguments repeated ad nauseam
—ad hominem attacks instead of thoughtful debate.
Spend a few minutes listening to mechanic debating op_return and you’ll clearly see who’s speaking truthfully.
👊🏻🧡🍻
Absolutely!
pay attention to the people who ignore this like its nothing, tells you more than what this simpleton actually tries to say....
The core dev team has clearly been coopted.
When things don’t add up over and over it’s because you’re being gaslit.
—silly strawman arguments repeated ad nauseam
—ad hominem attacks instead of thoughtful debate.
Spend a few minutes listening to Mechanic @npub1wnlu...n3wr debating op_return and you’ll clearly see who’s speaking truthfully.
👊🏻🧡🍻
View quoted note →
She’s getting so much hate but many Bitcoiners ARE in fact narrow-minded and shut down anything else simply because it’s not Bitcoin despite other coins having real utility.
But again, it doesn’t surprise me that purist ideologue retards behave in such a manner. It’s the same bullshit as politics all over again… any opinion that is against a pre-determined belief system is viewed as heresy and that person is unintelligent and a traitor.
View quoted note →
Interesting. That list of people have not liked me for a long time.
Core is blatantly spitting in our faces begging for a chain split. It will be important not to make any sudden changes until we know their strategy. Because of this I think the BIP-444 "Temporary Softfork" idea is brilliant. Gives us time to build Knots and Ocean adoption while watching for Core's next moves.
Yes run Knots


Crazy stuff
Yea, I disagree with her, I’m narrow minded and she is dumb.
She is "open-minded" spam supporter and shitcoiner or I would say mindless shitcoiner.
Yea. She is / was lead dev for Bitcoin. What a fuckin disaster.
Get a grip dude 😂 if that clip makes you lose your mind you might want to focus on your mind.
Get a grip and look at all the evidence. This is just one of many. You are asleep.
I just looked at this evidence you submitted to us here in the court of Nostr sir 😀
Your hyperbole doesn’t match what she actually said. Plus there’s at least one edit so there’s that, but still. This is not a crazy evil person talking crazy shit here sorry ya gotta do better to convince me at least….
: )
Notice something wrong?
Compromised Core devs rejected the fix for inscriptions pretending it has been "controversial PR".
Compromised Core dev pushed OP_RETURN as if it was not controversial.
View quoted note →
View quoted note →
View quoted note →This is how Gloria Zhao became Core lead maintainer.
View quoted note →
And this is what Compromised Core devs did.
View quoted note →
View quoted note →
If only there was a private decentralized cryptocurrency that incentivized the miners to protect the monetary transactions, and their transmission of value instead of adding unnecessary data into the blockchain 🤔.
If only, if only...
Nothing stops greed. Spam money would be on top of what they get.
We are attacked from inside. You are not immune to such attacks either.
But we still have means to protect Bitcoin.
More, or less but so far.
Bitcoin's core team have not acted in the best interests of the project.
Monero's potentially compromised contributors have stepped down, and updates require a community consensus.
Not saying it's perfect but Monero seems to have less compromised devs, and has more mechanisms to ensure compromised devs don't have total control.
Monero already had The Op_Return (TX_Extra) debate, and TX_Extra was reduced to counteract ordinals on Monero
So far between the two it seems like Monero has the better record for now.
But I'd like to hear the suggestions to counteract these problems in Bitcoin, so hopefully it can also be saved.
👌🙂