“Where is the public roadmap for Bitcoin Core?” This sentiment from Zach is common and Ill give my own thoughts on it The subprojects that individual Bitcoin Core engineers contribute to reflect the project’s *software development priorities* which can include things like testing improvements, refactors, features, maintenance, or performance improvements. These software engineering efforts are distinct from the Bitcoin *protocol*, whose consensus rules change only through broad community agreement and network adoption, not by decisions made exclusively within the Bitcoin Core repository. If I were looking to derive a shorter term “public roadmap for Bitcoin Core” (again, the Bitcoin Core software, not Bitcoin protocol), there are a few places to look. **Working Groups** Contributors actively working on similar efforts form working groups to implement and review projects in Bitcoin Core. A list of the current working groups is on the Bitcoin Core Wiki: From here we can see interest in: Erlay, Fuzzing, Kernel, Benchmarking, Silent Payments, Cluster Mempool, Stratum v2, Multiprocess, QML GUI, and Net Split These working groups also provide updates at the weekly Bitcoin Core developer meetings on IRC: This is another place to see current work. **Tracking issues** Many subprojects within Bitcoin Core have a place to track a todo list of code changes that roll up into that project. Here are just a few examples (search the GitHub for “tracking issue” for more): Multiprocess - Mining interface - MuSig2 - Cluster mempool - Erlay - Bitcoin Kernel Library - SENDTEMPLATE - **Core Dev meetups** What developers discuss at recent in-person meetings is another data point. Here are transcripts from the October 2025 meeting - February 2025 meeting - **Merged PRs** As code changes are merged into the Bitcoin Core GitHub before the next release you can see precisely what will be in the upcoming release. These code changes include PRs related to projects above, but also more general changes unrelated to a particular project, like maintenance work, additional testing, one-off features, etc. Likewise Optech has a weekly notable code segment that picks interesting code merges to cover: **Release Milestones** As Bitcoin Core progresses toward a new release, PRs can be tagged with a milestone representing that release. For example, here are the items tagged for the previous v30 release: And here are considerations for the v31 release: **TLDR, just tell me what will be in v31** Sorry, there isn’t a definitive authoritative answer for a decentralized open source project like this. But also in the spirit of decentralization, I can provide my own guesses of what might be in there. Kernel API - modular use of Bitcoin’s consensus and validation logic outside the full node MuSig2 (in wallet) - fee-efficient, privacy-preserving multi-signature support Cluster mempool - makes transaction relay and block assembly more efficient, predictable, and network reliability. ASMap - help diversify peer connections, strengthening network resilience against eclipse attacks Static builds - reproducible, portable binaries that enhance security, verifiability, and ease of deployment I’ll emphasize that while these projects took a ton of work to get where they are, there will also be a majority of PRs in v31 that will not be part of a “project”. They will simply be general improvements, bug fixes, and maintenance work (see for examples)
Last week many Bitcoin Core developers met up in Frankfurt, Germany as part of their regular twice-yearly in person meetings. Attendees volunteered to take notes on the unconference-style sessions and I have a pull request to add the notes to the BTC transcripts website: - ASMap - Batch Validation - Secp256k1 and quantum - CISA - Cluster mempool - CMake - CoreCheck - Debugging - Fuzzamoto - Libsha - Multiprocess and Mining Interface - Fingerprinting - Net / net_processing split - Package relay - Private broadcast - Security audit - Subject matter experts and working groups - Sockets abstraction Additional informal discussions, code reviews, working groups, or other sessions occurred on: - BIP 3 - Wallet priorities - Compact Block prefills - Silent Payments - btck - CI - SwiftSync - Benchmarking and IBD - When do Bitcoin Core users upgrade? - MuSig2 - Kernel - Working in-person - Complications with fuzz testing - BlockTemplateManager - QML GUI - Shared Templates BIP - Headers-first sync - Batch Validation - FIBRE - Consensus Cleanup - Silent payments libsecp256k1 light client - Better communicating with the broad community - Discussion on block 920138 and Bitcoin Core #33687 - Mempool and relay policy - CI with CTest and CDash This meeting was sponsored by BTrust who provided the funding for the venue, food, supplies, etc to facilitate the meeting (thank you!). JD (from localhost research), Emily (from Brink) and myself organized. A list of previous meetings is here: The PR to the website is open here, pending approval:
Bitcoin Core v30: a deeper look Link to the tweet Non Twitter link