When I say I have pronoia resulting from my research, this is why.
I don't even have to go looking anymore.
Metaphorically speaking, puzzle pieces fall out of the sky right into place on my puzzle solving table.
People stop by and knock on my front door with a puzzle piece to add, and it fits.
I either have the biggest case of confirmation bias I can imagine or I'm onto something legitimate.
This many random, unsought, independent validations of the perspective my research has distilled cannot be a coincidence.
View quoted note →
Join us tomorrow (12 noon US east coast time) as we continue studying "The Law of One” which is a series of 106 conversations that occurred from 1981-1984 between a physics professor & the entity known as Ra who had previously tried to spread the Law of One in ancient Egypt with mixed results.
Last week, we covered:
- The logical fallacy known as a “False Dilemma",
- The second half (pages 58-63) of chapter 6 from “A Channeling Handbook”,
- Session 70 of the Law of One,
- Personal research updates from study group members along with discussion
This week we plan to cover:
- The causal fallacy known as a “Not a Cause for a Cause",
- The first half (pages 64-67) of chapter 7 from “A Channeling Handbook”,
- Session 71 of the Law of One,
- Personal research updates from study group members along with discussion
Link to join the "Flight Club" study group Clubhouse:
