If there's one thing institutional money is good at it is marketing. The large operators have always had a way of telling the retail public one thing, but doing another. Their actions are painted on charts, data doesn't have opinions. GM
People are up in arms about @Peter McCormack hiring a security detail, but no one AFAIK is talking about this. Sounds like lazy government wanting to outsource it's responsibility to a tech platform. Good on ya Pete. image
USD stablecoins are infinite loss coins. They are defective assets mainly transacted on defective networks. GM
Andreas rejected the zealous behavior that rose out of the block size wars. This reaction was one of, if not the first emergent complex behavior that Bitcoin produced. Did Andreas get his analysis of the reaction incorrect? Or was he justified in disliking the emergence of Bitcoin maximalism.