You think an industrial sized miner will just mine based on percentages post UASF. If the minority chain has 10% of total hashrate why wouldn't they dedicate 10% of their hashrate onto a pool mining that chain? Then adjust accordingly. Makes logical sense to me.

Its odd how most core devs/supporters have said or started with "I hate spam too, BUT" Now they have no definition of what spam is? If they can't define what is or is not spam, how are they gonna continue to make development changes to bitcoin going forward? They won't be able to decipher if a change is good or bad because- even they admit that they can't define what is good or bad. How they bicker reminds me of leftists. There is no standard of right and wrong, good or bad, spam or no spam. It's all just feels. 🤡

Every bitcoin fork that has prioritized full node runners and the longevity of pleb nodes has won. I'd be surprised if that isnt the case post Feb 1st. However I think knots supporters (myself included) will have to play the long game. I don't think this battle is won quickly but hopefully I am wrong.