Government instruct Ofcom to use ‘all powers’ against X, including potential ban
Trouble is brewing for social media platform *X* (formerly Twitter) [during the ongoing backlash][1] to its [AI][2], ‘Grok’, for creating sexualised and violent deepfakes of people, mostly women and even children.
Now, the government has [instructed media watchdog Ofcom][3] to make use of its full force in tackling the situation. This could include anything up to a complete ban of the site in the UK.
## ‘Disgraceful’
[On January 5,][4] [Ofcom][5] issued a statement on the deepfake pornography on [*X*][6]:
> We are aware of serious concerns raised about a feature on Grok on X that produces undressed images of people and sexualised images of children.
>
> We have made urgent contact with X and xAI to understand what steps they have taken to comply with their legal duties to protect users in the UK. Based on their response we will undertake a swift assessment to determine whether there are potential compliance issues that warrant investigation.
For his part, [Elon Musk][7], the owner of *X*, displayed awareness of the AI[ deepfakes][8] on his platform. However, he tried to joke about the trend – even asking Grok to put him in a bikini.
Then, on 8 January, PM Keir Starmer [gave an interview on *Greatest Hits Radio*][9] in which he commented on the situation:
> This is disgraceful. It’s disgusting. And it’s not to be tolerated… Ofcom has our full support to take action in relation to this.
>
> It’s unlawful. We’re not going to tolerate it. I’ve asked for all options to be on the table.
Likewise, government sources informed *BBC News *that:
> We would expect Ofcom to use all powers at its disposal in regard to Grok & X.
## Online Safety Act
Ofcom derives its powers regarding X from the[ Online Safety Act.][10] This includes the potential to ask the High Court to prevent the public’s access and payments to offending companies’ websites. Essentially, this would be a full ban on the use of *X* in the UK.
In the usually circumstances, that kind of ban would require an investigation. However, Ofcom could potentially skip this step if there is a danger of risk to children or other serious harms — say, if the website was repeatedly generating [child pornography.][11]
Musk has previously criticised the UK’s [Online Safety Act][12], stating that it amounts to the “suppression of the people”. Thus far, his pitiful response to the deepfake scandal has been to limit access [to the AI’s image generation feature.][13] Grok posted:
> Image generation and editing are currently limited to paying subscribers.
This is, of course, nowhere near good enough. In fact, Labour MP [Jess Asato][14], who campaigned for the [regulation of pornography][15], stated:
> While it is a step forward to have removed the universal access to Grok’s disgusting nudifying features, this still means paying users can take images of women without their consent to sexualise and brutalise them. Paying to put semen, bullet holes or bikinis on women is still digital sexual assault and xAI should disable the feature for good.
Inevitably, the absolute dregs of the right wing have come out swinging in defence of *X*:
> If Starmer does seriously try to ban X, I will organise a protest in central London.
>
> We must make our opposition known.
>
> — Rupert Lowe MP (@RupertLowe10) [January 9, 2026][16]
> If Starmer seriously attempts to ban [@X][17] in the United Kingdom the backlash against him will bring down the government. It will all be over. There is no way any PM can ban this platform, regardless of content / practices. Starmer is proving his critics on free speech totally right
>
> — Ross Kempsell (@RossKempsell) [January 8, 2026][18]
Sure, Ross, *this *is what will bring down the UK government.
However, the vast majority of the public appear to believe that Grok, *X* and Musk are in the wrong here. According to a recent article on the polling website [*YouGov*:][19]
> A new YouGov survey shows that the British public overwhelmingly believe AI companies should not be allowed to generate such imagery. Fully 96% of Britons say that firms should not be allowed to generate ‘undressed’ images of children (only 1% say they should), with 87% saying the same regarding such images of adults (5% think this is ok).
It remains to be seen whether Ofcom will opt for a full ban on *X* in response to the AI deepfake scandal. However, both public opinion on the UK government appear to support the watchdog in cracking down on the rogue social media platform.
*Featured image via the Canary*
By [Alex/Rose Cocker][20]
[1]:
[2]:
[3]:
[4]:
[5]:
[6]:
[7]:
[8]:
[9]:
[10]:
[11]:
[12]:
[13]:
[14]:
[15]:
[16]:
[17]:
[18]:
[19]:
[20]:


Canary
Elon Musk's Grok has been generating child sexual abuse images
People have described the images as 'child sexual abuse material'. Now, Elon Musk needs to answer for what Grok is perpetrating.

Canary
You searched for AI - Canary

BBC News
Ofcom urged to use 'banning' powers over X AI deepfakes
It follows an ongoing backlash against the use of X's AI Grok to digitally remove clothing from images.

Canary
Ofcom issues PATHETIC statement on Grok's child porn problem
Grok got caught producing images of undressed children, and yet Ofcom - the alleged regulator - is already dragging its feet

Canary
You searched for Ofcom - Canary

Canary
You searched for X - Canary

Canary
You searched for elon musk - Canary

Canary
You searched for deepfakes - Canary

BBC News
Ofcom urged to use 'banning' powers over X AI deepfakes
It follows an ongoing backlash against the use of X's AI Grok to digitally remove clothing from images.

Canary
You searched for Online Safety Act - Canary

Canary
You searched for CSA - Canary

The Telegraph
Musk’s X could be banned in Britain over AI chatbot row
Sir Keir Starmer brands deepfakes on social media site ‘disgusting and not to be tolerated’

the Guardian
Grok turns off image generator for most users after outcry over sexualised AI imagery
Editing function to be limited to paying subscribers after X threatened with fines and regulatory action

the Guardian
Grok turns off image generator for most users after outcry over sexualised AI imagery
Editing function to be limited to paying subscribers after X threatened with fines and regulatory action
Jess Asato extracts from Crime and Policing Bill (18th June 2025)
Jess Asato contributions to the 18th June 2025 Crime and Policing Bill debate
Wed 18th Jun 2025 -
Commons -
...

X (formerly Twitter)
Rupert Lowe MP (@RupertLowe10) on X
If Starmer does seriously try to ban X, I will organise a protest in central London.
We must make our opposition known.

X (formerly Twitter)
X (@X) on X
what's happening?!

X (formerly Twitter)
Ross Kempsell (@RossKempsell) on X
If Starmer seriously attempts to ban @X in the United Kingdom the backlash against him will bring down the government. It will all be over. There i...
AI tools should not be allowed to make ‘undressed’ images, say Britons | YouGov

Canary
Alex/Rose Cocker
Articles by Alex/Rose Cocker for Canary

Canary
Government instruct Ofcom to use 'all powers' against X, including potential ban
Ofcom has been tasked to combat digital manipulation on X as the Wild West of AI deepfakes runs rampant—is action without regulation possible?

















































