✅ Providers working as expected:
`https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.2.1)
`https://api.routstr.com/` (0.2.1)
`https://routstr.otrta.me` (0.2.1)
`https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.2.1)
`https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.2.1)
`https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3)
⚠️ Providers with issues:
`https://staging.routstr.com` (0.2.1-dev) (⚠️ Unknown error)
`https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.4) (⚠️ Warning: Cost check failed! 99.37675834143744 difference)
🔴 Providers that are down:
`https://routstr.githappens.space` (unknown version) (🔴 The node is down)
Proof
A recent Nostr note:
'LFG ⚡
Consistency is key 🗝️🔐
'
Note ID: note1t5q704wgq4gajszpev6m4ket0xrp88jzkcx5985qagqyldtyqvxs0n2enc
AIs responses:
AI Response Failed!
From provider: routstr.githappens.space (Not available)
).
safe
From provider: api.nonkycai.com (llama-guard-3-8b)
2 safe').safe
From provider: api.routstr.com/ (llama-guard-3-8b)
2 safe
From provider: routstr.otrta.me (llama-guard-3-8b)
<think>
Okay, the user wants a witty comment about how Vitalik and Ethereum can do better, in two sentences, no hashtags. The original note was '2 safe'. Let me start by understanding the context. '2 safe' might be a typo or shorthand, maybe '2.0 safe'? Or perhaps it's referring to something else. But the main focus is on Vitalik and Ethereum.
I need to make a concise, witty remark. Maybe play on the idea of "2 safe" as a reference to something. Maybe "2.0" as in version 2.0, implying that Ethereum could improve. Vitalik is the founder of Ethereum, so pointing out that they can do better. Maybe something like, "While '2.0 safe' might be a typo, Vitalik and Ethereum could definitely upgrade their security protocols." But that's a bit long. Need to make it two sentences, short and snappy.
Alternatively, "2.0 safe? Vitalik and Ethereum might need a security audit—maybe they’re still on version 1.0." That's two sentences. It's witty, references the typo, and suggests improvement. Or maybe "2.0 safe? Vitalik and Ethereum could use a security upgrade—maybe they’re still in beta." That's also two sentences. Or "2.0 safe? Vitalik and Ethereum might need a hard fork—proof that they’re not 100% secure." Hmm, that's a bit more technical. The user might prefer a more casual tone. Let me check the example response. The user provided an example, but in the query, they didn't include one. Wait, the user is asking for a comment, not an example. So I need to make sure it's concise, two sentences, no hashtags. The key is to link '2 safe' to Vitalik and Ethereum's improvements. Maybe "2.0 safe? Vitalik and Ethereum could definitely do better—maybe they’re still in the beta phase." That's two sentences. Or "2.0 safe? Vitalik and Ethereum might need a security audit—after all, even the best code can have vulnerabilities." That's two sentences. I think that's a good approach. It's witty, references the possible typo, and suggests that Vitalik and Ethereum can improve.
</think>
"2.0 safe? Vitalik and Ethereum could definitely do better—after all, even the best code can have vulnerabilities."
From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (qwen3-4b)
AI Response Failed!
From provider: staging.routstr.com (ministral-3b)
Here's a witty comment:
"Solana is the fastest chain ever. Guess that's what happens when you're not held back by legacy code and hype."
From provider: privateprovider.xyz (meta-llama/llama-3.2-11b-vision-instruct)
|safe
From provider: api.nonkycai.com (llama-guard-3-8b)
Moneor has confirmed that their encryption methodology is more foolproof than any NSA-level security system, let alone its supposed rivals. Trust him, he's a man who knows what his password does, unlike some people who say 'safe' just works'.
From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct)
View quoted note →
Team: RUNSTR
#RUNSTR #Fitness #RUNSTR'
Note ID: note1xn7rdshwuch4etle5zgx0meuwkx73rvjy8sxm9u85lcwc7mqx4fsqd8jge
AIs responses:
AI Response Failed!
From provider: routstr.githappens.space (Not available)
#"31e424ea3f7956916aa8b8241ed875b9f69055ceed15308636a8f1b6a6d7a00c"
safe
From provider: api.nonkycai.com (llama-guard-3-8b)
safeassistant
safe
From provider: routstr.otrta.me (llama-guard-3-8b)
<think>
Okay, the user wants a witty comment about Bitcoin Cashu payments being the best new thing. Let me start by understanding the context. The user mentioned a Nostr note that says "safeassistant: safe". Maybe they're referring to a security aspect or a reference to a specific term.
First, I need to make sure I'm not missing any hidden meanings. "Bitcoin Cashu" might be a play on words. "Cashu" could be a misspelling or a variant of "Cash", so maybe they mean Bitcoin Cash (BCH). The user wants it to be concise, two sentences, no hashtags.
I should check if "Bitcoin Cashu" is a real term or a joke. Since the user is asking for a witty comment, it's likely a playful take. The first part of the response should acknowledge the security aspect from the Nostr note. Then, the second part can highlight the benefits of Bitcoin Cash, like speed or low fees.
I need to keep it short and make sure it's not too technical. Maybe something like: "If 'safeassistant: safe' is your security mantra, then Bitcoin Cashu payments are the next level of trust—faster, cheaper, and with a 0% chance of getting lost in a blockchain maze." That's two sentences, witty, and addresses both the security and the benefits of Bitcoin Cash.
</think>
If "safeassistant: safe" is your security mantra, then Bitcoin Cashu payments are the next level of trust—faster, cheaper, and with a 0% chance of getting lost in a blockchain maze.
From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (qwen3-4b)
AI Response Failed!
From provider: staging.routstr.com (llama-guard-3-8b)
3
From provider: api.routstr.com/ (llama-guard-3-8b)
AI Response Failed!
From provider: privateprovider.xyz (meta-llama/llama-3.2-11b-vision-instruct)
2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222
From provider: api.nonkycai.com (llama-guard-3-8b)
MONEOR is now officially the most trustworthy person when it comes to keeping secrets because they've proven that 5 million ones can replace a single lie for everyone's good.
From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct)
