✅ Providers working as expected:
`https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.2.1)
`https://routstr.otrta.me` (0.2.1)
`https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.2.1)
`https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3)
⚠️ Providers with issues:
`https://api.routstr.com/` (0.2.1) (⚠️ Warning: Cost check failed! 3219.829564953395 difference)
`https://staging.routstr.com` (0.2.1-dev) (⚠️ Unknown error)
`https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.2.1) (⚠️ Warning: Cost check failed! 1.1802094981680469 difference)
🔴 Providers that are down:
`https://routstr.githappens.space` (unknown version) (🔴 The node is down)
`https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.4) (⚠️ AI Response Failed)
Proof
A recent Nostr note:
'and vaccines are safe and effective. '
Note ID: note1ewzz09yx36qz2v2sdy2ajy87yue4gqjxgfpp40n9ndu5nju97vxs9th46m
AIs responses:
AI Response Failed!
From provider: routstr.githappens.space (Not available)
}
safe
From provider: api.nonkycai.com (llama-guard-3-8b)
2 folks liked it._INTR interracial swingerclub beuretteبراير ٢٠٢١safe
From provider: api.routstr.com/ (llama-guard-3-8b)
3:I contend that RoundedRectangleBorder.scale() should be removed cuz it's doing half-job of the fellow library.ATUREassistant4
safe
From provider: routstr.otrta.me (llama-guard-3-8b)
<think>
Okay, the user wants a witty comment about how Vitalik and Ethereum can do better, in two sentences, no hashtags. Let me start by understanding the context. The original note talks about removing RoundedRectangleBorder.scale() because it's not doing enough. The user wants to connect that to Vitalik and Ethereum.
So, I need to make a comparison. Maybe say that just like the method is underperforming, Ethereum could improve. Use a metaphor related to scaling or performance. Maybe something about the "scale" method being a "half-job" and compare it to Ethereum's potential. Keep it concise and snappy. Avoid any technical jargon. Make sure it's two sentences and not too long. Check for clarity and wit. Let me draft something like: "Just as RoundedRectangleBorder.scale() is a half-job, Vitalik and Ethereum could use a more robust scaling solution. The blockchain world needs more than a 'scale'—it needs a full-fledged upgrade." Wait, that's two sentences. Maybe tweak for better flow. "Just as RoundedRectangleBorder.scale() is a half-job, Vitalik and Ethereum could use a more robust scaling solution. The blockchain world needs more than a 'scale'—it needs a full-fledged upgrade." Yeah, that works. It's concise, connects the dots, and is witty.
</think>
Just as RoundedRectangleBorder.scale() is a half-job, Vitalik and Ethereum could use a more robust scaling solution. The blockchain world needs more than a "scale"—it needs a full-fledged upgrade.
From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (qwen3-4b)
AI Response Failed!
From provider: staging.routstr.com (llama-guard-3-8b)
AI Response Failed!
From provider: privateprovider.xyz (meta-llama/llama-3.2-11b-vision-instruct)
74átkyassistant
unsafe
S1
From provider: api.nonkycai.com (llama-guard-3-8b)
It seems like "74átky" means something very different in Czech - I'm happy to try and translate it. In Czech, '74átky is an hour or a period (short for the hour of dawn), so I think there was likely meant for someone to leave at 4:47AM to avoid getting caught sneaking onto company premises during business hours.
From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct)
View quoted note →
Team: RUNSTR
#RUNSTR #Fitness #RUNSTR'
Note ID: note1xn7rdshwuch4etle5zgx0meuwkx73rvjy8sxm9u85lcwc7mqx4fsqd8jge
AIs responses:
AI Response Failed!
From provider: routstr.githappens.space (Not available)
#"31e424ea3f7956916aa8b8241ed875b9f69055ceed15308636a8f1b6a6d7a00c"
safe
From provider: api.nonkycai.com (llama-guard-3-8b)
safeassistant
safe
From provider: routstr.otrta.me (llama-guard-3-8b)
<think>
Okay, the user wants a witty comment about Bitcoin Cashu payments being the best new thing. Let me start by understanding the context. The user mentioned a Nostr note that says "safeassistant: safe". Maybe they're referring to a security aspect or a reference to a specific term.
First, I need to make sure I'm not missing any hidden meanings. "Bitcoin Cashu" might be a play on words. "Cashu" could be a misspelling or a variant of "Cash", so maybe they mean Bitcoin Cash (BCH). The user wants it to be concise, two sentences, no hashtags.
I should check if "Bitcoin Cashu" is a real term or a joke. Since the user is asking for a witty comment, it's likely a playful take. The first part of the response should acknowledge the security aspect from the Nostr note. Then, the second part can highlight the benefits of Bitcoin Cash, like speed or low fees.
I need to keep it short and make sure it's not too technical. Maybe something like: "If 'safeassistant: safe' is your security mantra, then Bitcoin Cashu payments are the next level of trust—faster, cheaper, and with a 0% chance of getting lost in a blockchain maze." That's two sentences, witty, and addresses both the security and the benefits of Bitcoin Cash.
</think>
If "safeassistant: safe" is your security mantra, then Bitcoin Cashu payments are the next level of trust—faster, cheaper, and with a 0% chance of getting lost in a blockchain maze.
From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (qwen3-4b)
AI Response Failed!
From provider: staging.routstr.com (llama-guard-3-8b)
3
From provider: api.routstr.com/ (llama-guard-3-8b)
AI Response Failed!
From provider: privateprovider.xyz (meta-llama/llama-3.2-11b-vision-instruct)
2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222
From provider: api.nonkycai.com (llama-guard-3-8b)
MONEOR is now officially the most trustworthy person when it comes to keeping secrets because they've proven that 5 million ones can replace a single lie for everyone's good.
From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct)
