Fun Fact: The original "Wayback Machine" from Jay Ward "Peabody and Sherman" segments (starting circa 1959 or so), has an interesting backstory, explained in the very first segment. Created by Mr. Peabody as a teaching device for his adopted boy Sherman, it originally was a fairly straightforward time machine that presented a couple of significant limitations. During an initial run, P&S of course realized that most people they visited were speaking other languages -- Peabody made an adjustment so that languages were no longer an issue (a plot device borrowed by Doctor Who for the TARDIS later). On their next test run, P&S realized that they could not affect anything in the time periods they visited -- they were completely ignored. So Peabody made another adjustment so that they could fully interact, saying that this made it not a "way things were" machine but rather a "the way things should have been" machine. Each episode always ended with some awful pun. At my infamous Jay Ward Film Festival at UCLA back in the early 80s, Bill Scott admitted that he had written all those puns.
Moderate Santa Ana winds continue to blow on and off for days now, currently 76F in my corner of L.A.
Machado "presented" Trump her Nobel Peace Prize, but Nobel Committee says it's still hers, not Trump's, no matter who has physical possession.
Trump announces "outline" of his "health care plan", retreading tired old GOP ideas
WHAT THE HELL is the American Humane Society doing hosting their fundraiser at Mar-a-Lago and being addressed by Trump? Put aside the creepy French Revolution dog-headed dancers furry vibes, if they want to lose the goodwill of their donors by getting into bed with Trump and his puppy-shooting DHS secretary, while Trump's administration is tearing down species protection laws across the country, the Society sure found a way to disgust people everywhere.
[Uh ... ] Trump's Mar-a-Lago Hosts Deranged 'Furry' Marie Antoinette Party image
IMPORTANT: #Google site crawling policy rumor: I've been getting a lot of queries over the last few days regarding a recent rumor spreading rapidly that Google has or will soon be changing their site crawling policy to omit indexing of sites that do not have a robots.txt file. This rumor appears to probably trace back to this Google webmaster community video: This video does seem to say that robots.txt is the first file on a site Google will attempt to retrieve, and if it can't find it the crawling and indexing stops at that point. Not crawling/indexing sites without robots.txt files would make no sense to me -- vast numbers of older sites and others have never had robots.txt files because they never felt a need to publish crawling restrictions. Also note that this Google support doc: explicitly says that robots.txt files are not required for crawling/indexing. Several sources at Google (thanks all!) have now confirmed directly to me that robots.txt files are NOT required for indexing and no change to this policy is in the pipeline. Of course, if you have a sitemap that specifies a robots.txt file that doesn't actually exist you might create a suboptimal crawling situation, but again Google's official statement to me on this is that robots.txt files are NOT required to be present for a site to be crawled and indexed by Google. image
Media Matters says it's leaving X due to TOS changes
After 48 hours of panic, $2 billion in mental health grant cuts are restored https://www.npr.org/2026/01/14/nx-s1-5677714/trump-administration-mental-health-addiction-grant-cuts-restored image
BREAKING: White House meeting with Greenland/Denmark blows up -- EU sending military forces to Greenland to protect it from U.S. attacks