Rachel Reeves really is clueless Rachel Reeves' budget speech was a vacuous re-presentation of what she had said during the general election campaign, mixed with arrogant smugness, meaningless rhetoric and a total absence of narrative or ideas. I wish there was something good to note in all this, but before she celebrates being the first woman Chancellor of the Exchequer, shouldn't she prove she is up to the job?
Will Reeves reform HM Revenue & Customs? HM Revenue & Customs is a massively underperforming organisation. It fails to collect at least £40 billion of tax owing a year. Spending just £1 billion extra a year on it could massively increase the tax yield in the UK, but it seems that Rachel Reeves is only interested in small changes over many years to come. Why is she, like so many of her predecessors, uninterested in closing the tax gap?
Who and what should Labour tax? Who and what should Labour tax? Those things that cause harm, those things that create inequality, those things that we should be changing to make sure we have a society in the future. I think that's a basis for taxation that is ethically justifiable, irrespective of the questions about revenue that might or might not arise.
The likelihood that this is a very happy Labour government is very low indeed Some new Cabinet ministers might enjoy the humiliation that serving Starmer and Reeves demands that they accept, but I suspect they are a decided minority. How long will it be before open rebellion becomes apparent?
Why can’t Labour do critical thinking? With a Cabinet made up of supposedly highly qualified graduates, all of whom would claim to have a social conscience, you would expect Labour to be able to think critically about the solutions required to the problems created by fourteen years of Tory rule. Right now, however, it seems that there is not one critical thinker among the lot of them. No wonder they’re already in such a mess.
When economic misinformation hides economic negligence The UK‘s system of national accounting permits the presentation of entirely incorrect data by the Office for National Statistics that is passed off as correct largely because there is no proper accounting discipline, let alone double entry book-keeping, implicit within it. The resulting misinformation can be readily abused by the government.
The Bank of England is continuing to engineer a recession – and Rachel Reeves is letting it do so Labour is talking the country into a downturn and the Bank of England is delivering policy to make that happen. What are they trying to do?
Starmer exposed Starmer's exposed his inner self, and it's not appealing.
Why is modern monetary theory so important? Some people argue that modern monetary theory is irrelevant or that it changes nothing. They're wrong. MMT fundamentally reframes the power relationships within our economy, moving power away from banking and the City and towards democratic government control whilst prioritising people and full employment instead. No wonder so many people don't like it: MMT challenges all the privileges they enjoy at cost to the rest of us.
The way we are is unsustainable The FT is full of warnings for Rachel Reeves this morning, suggesting that her direction of travel is unsustainable unless recession is her goal. Will she heed the warnings?