Men Far More Likely Than Women To Die By Suicide Men Far More Likely Than Women To Die By Suicide The following chart,  on suicide prevalence in countries around the world. Out of every 100,000 men in the United States, an average of 24 died from suicide in 2021, while for women the average was close to seven per 100,000. In several countries these figures were even higher, such as in South Korea, Lithuania and Hungary. While there are significant differences between countries, one pattern is clear to see: the rates of men taking their own lives are generally higher than those of women. You will find more infographics at Lithuania and South Korea had the highest rates of suicide among men in 2021 (out of the countries reporting data), at 50 and 37 cases per 100,000 population, respectively. For women, South Korea, India and Japan had the highest rates of the selected countries, with 14.6, 10.9 and 10.1 cases per 100,000. According to the 📄.pdf , the African Region has the highest suicide rate in the world, estimated at 11.2 people per 100,000 population in 2019, compared to the global average of 9.0 per 100,000 population that year. Lesotho had particularly high rates at 87.5 per 100,000 population that year, followed by Eswatini at 40.5 per 100,000 population. The WHO underscores how 77 percent of suicides occurred in low- and middle-income countries in 2019, where a majority of the world's population lives, adding that a lack of data on suicide has led to continued underreporting. If you or somebody you know are in need of help, you can find a list of suicide crisis lines and website for countries around the world https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_suicide_crisis_lines/ . Fri, 10/31/2025 - 23:00
These 2 Supreme Court Cases May Affect Future Elections These 2 Supreme Court Cases May Affect Future Elections The country is gearing up for the 2026 midterms, and the stakes are especially high for both allies and opponents of President Donald Trump’s administration. image In October, the Supreme Court heard two cases that may impact upcoming elections: one dealing with race-based congressional maps, and the other addressing whether federal candidates can challenge state laws that allow ballot counting after election day. Race-Based Redistricting Following a lawsuit by minority voters, a federal court in Louisiana ordered the state to redraw its congressional map to add a second majority-black district, since that demographic made up one-third of the state’s population. After it did so, a group of non-minority voters sued, arguing that the new maps discriminated against them racially. Earlier this year, the Supreme Court heard arguments for both cases in a combined case called 📄.pdf . They asked whether Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act was being unconstitutionally interpreted to force states to draw congressional maps with extra mostly-minority districts. That section of the law prohibits voter restriction based on “race or color.” However, the court did not issue a ruling at that time. Instead, it rescheduled the case for October, asking both sides to be ready to argue whether using race as a factor to decide district lines violated the 14th and 15th Amendments. Those Amendments guarantee equal protection under the law, and the right to vote despite considerations of “race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” At the time, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that the court should decide those cases immediately, and not wait until October. “Congress requires this Court to exercise jurisdiction over constitutional challenges to congressional redistricting, and we accordingly have an obligation to resolve such challenges promptly,” he wrote. Thomas wrote that previous Supreme Court decisions had created “tension” between the Voting Rights Act and the 14th and 15th Amendments: Lower courts had interpreted those decisions to mean that if a state could create an extra mostly-African-American district, then it must do so, he wrote. During the October hearing, the court likely to narrow the Voting Rights Act. Counting Late Ballots Rep. Mike Bost (R-Ill.) and two presidential electors filed 📄.pdf in 2022, challenging Illinois regulations that allow counting of mail-in ballots up to two weeks after an election. In addition to violating federal election law, they said, those rules require Bost to pay campaign staff for an extra two weeks of work as they monitor the late ballot-counting. The lower courts ruled that Bost did not have standing, i.e., the right to sue, because the decision to pay staff to monitor the ballots was a “self-inflicted” injury. The Fifth Circuit Appeals Court also said Bost could not show the law injured him because the 2024 election was still two months away at the time of their ruling. So, in the case Bost v. Illinois Board of Elections, the question before the Supreme Court is not yet about counting late ballots, but whether a federal candidate has the right to challenge the practice. Paul Clement, arguing for Bost, 📄.pdf the court that counting the late ballots was illegal, could cost Bost the election or reduce his margin of victory, and meant he had to shell out extra money to pay his staff. “All of that means that Congressman Bost has standing three times over,” he said. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said those harms seemed “speculative.” Jane Notz, attorney for Illinois, said that allowing anyone who called themselves a ‘candidate’ to challenge election rules in court would result in “chaos.” “It is very easy to be a candidate,” she said. “Any self-declared candidate could challenge any election rule that they happen to have a policy disagreement with, even if that rule were entirely harmless.” image Louisiana Congressional District Map; Districts 2 and 6 are mostly-black districts. Illustration by The Epoch Times, Public Domain, Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times She also argued that Bost has no standing because he is unlikely to lose the race: He won the last two elections by 49 points and 50 points, respectively. But when the justices asked how close the race would need to be for a candidate to have standing, Notz was unable give an answer. Some of the justices were concerned that denying a candidate standing until after the election was underway would produce its own basket of problems. “What you’re sketching out for us is a potential disaster,” Chief Justice John Roberts said. “If the candidate hopes to win by a dozen votes—and there are places in the country where that happens over and over again—then he has standing. But we’re not going to know that until we get very close to the election, right? And so it’s going to be in the middle, the most fraught time for the Court to get involved in electoral politics.” Justice Neil Gorsuch also asked if there was something “unseemly” about courts interfering with an election by making public statements about which candidate was most likely to win, and by how much. The Outcome The court has not yet issued a ruling in either of these cases, and timing is key. Because of a rule called the , courts avoid issuing relevant decisions just before elections, in order to avoid voter confusion. But if the Supreme Court issues a ruling on the Louisiana case before states begin their primary elections, some may choose to remake districts that were drawn with race-based considerations. Historically, mostly-minority districts tend to vote Democrat, so redrawing those maps would likely favor the GOP. Arkansas’s primary election is in March. Alabama, Georgia, and Mississippi are among the likely candidates. All three states were previously forced by courts to redraw their congressional district lines. Republicans currently have a narrow majority in both chambers of Congress and control of the White House. Democrats seek to break that grip by eliminating the GOP majority in the House; Trump has forestalled that plan by urging red states to redraw their congressional district lines, creating new majority-Republican districts. Trump’s plan may receive a boost, depending on how the Supreme Court rules. The Bost case may take longer to have an effect. Since the case before the court addresses standing, the actual issue of late ballot-counting would likely be kicked back to lower courts, which would take time to issue decisions. If Bost prevails, it would allow candidates the opportunity to challenge election laws ahead of time, with unpredictable consequences. Thu, 10/30/2025 - 17:45
More Than Half A Million Illegal Immigrants Deported From US: DHS More Than Half A Million Illegal Immigrants Deported From US: DHS More than 527,000 illegal immigrants have been removed from the United States so far under the Trump administration, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said in a on Oct. 27. “The Trump Administration is on pace to shatter historic records and deport nearly 600,000 illegal aliens by the end of President Donald Trump’s first year since returning to office. More than 2 million illegal aliens have left the U.S., including 1.6 million who have voluntarily self-deported and over 527,000 deportations,” DHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin said. “This is just the beginning. President Trump and Secretary Noem have jumpstarted an agency that was hamstrung and barred from doing its job for the last four years.” DHS the CBP Home app, which illegal immigrants can use to notify the federal government of their intention to depart the United States. image The government is currently offering illegal immigrants $1,000 and free flights to self-deport back to their home nations. This gives them a chance to come back legally. Those arrested and deported won’t be able to return to the United States, DHS said. According to the DHS, law enforcement has been removing the “worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens” from the country, including rapists, murderers, drug dealers, and pedophiles, despite facing opposition from politicians in sanctuary jurisdictions. Sanctuary from the Department of Justice (DOJ), 12 states and 18 local jurisdictions in the country are currently classified as following such policies. Meanwhile, DHS and the Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) operations against illegal immigrants have faced widespread in places such as Portland and Chicago, which are on the DOJ’s sanctuary jurisdiction list. Currently, ICE has around 129 detention across the United States to house illegal immigrants before presenting them before an immigration judge or removing them from the country. The Trump administration has also faced legal challenges in court. For instance, President Donald Trump had the National Guard deployment in Portland. “In the face of a historic number of injunctions from activist judges and threats to law enforcement, DHS, ICE, and CBP have not just closed the border, but made historic strides to carry out President Trump’s promise of arresting and deporting illegal aliens who have invaded our country,” McLaughlin said. “Illegal aliens are hearing our message to leave now or face the consequence: Migrants are now turning back before they even reach our borders. Migration through Panama’s Darien Gap is down 99.99 percent.” Democrats Launch Investigation Democratic lawmakers have criticized the illegal immigrant crackdown initiated by the Trump administration. An Oct. 20 from the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) have launched an investigation into DHS over reports of unlawful detentions of U.S. citizens and immigrants by federal agents. In a 📄.pdf to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, the lawmakers said there have been “reports of excessive, shocking behavior by CBP and ICE agents directed at U.S. citizens.” The letter claimed that more than 170 U.S. citizens had been detained by immigration agents over the previous nine months. “The impact of these arrests has not been evenly distributed across the country, and cities like Chicago, Portland, Washington, and Los Angeles have been targeted heavily by ICE and CBP. Troublingly, the pattern of U.S. Citizen arrests coincides with an alarming increase in racial profiling—particularly of Latinos,” the letter stated. The lawmakers demanded that Noem submit certain information to the House Oversight Committee by Nov. 3, including the number of American citizens detained by CBP, ICE, or DHS since Jan. 20. DHS said in its Oct. 27 statement that 70 percent of arrests made by ICE were of criminal illegal immigrants convicted or charged with a crime in the United States. In an Oct. 21 on X, Noem said that more than 480,000 criminal illegal immigrants were arrested in the nine months under the Trump administration. “What our law enforcement has accomplished for the American people, under President Trump, is nothing short of extraordinary,” she wrote. “We will continue to fulfill @POTUS Trump’s promise to Make America Safe Again, secure our borders, and protect our people.” Tue, 10/28/2025 - 13:45
One Third Of Americans Have More Credit Card Debt Than Savings One Third Of Americans Have More Credit Card Debt Than Savings One in three Americans now have more credit card debt than emergency savings, according to the latest https://www.bankrate.com/banking/savings/emergency-savings-report/  by financial services company Bankrate. , this is up ten percentage points from 2011, when the company first started polling the question. Meanwhile, around 53 percent of respondents said that their savings were currently exceeding their credit card debt. This is down two percentage points from the same time last year, but slightly up from 2011. Around one in ten Americans are living paycheck-to-paycheck in 2025, not making any   or saving up money. You will find more infographics at Millennials were the most likely to say that they had tapped into their emergency savings over the past 12 months. The most common uses for emergency savings among all groups were unplanned emergency expenses, such as car repairs or medical bills, followed by monthly bills, including rent and  , followed by day-to-day expenses such as food. Mon, 10/20/2025 - 20:30
India's Largest Metals Refinery Just Ran Out Of Silver For The First Time In History India's Largest Metals Refinery Just Ran Out Of Silver For The First Time In History Shortages hit London too. The silver market is broken. image Sold Out in India, Panic in London Bloomberg comments  Key Takeaways Vipin Raina’s company, India’s largest precious metals refinery, ran out of silver stock for the first time in its history due to high demand from Indian customers. The shortages in India were soon felt globally, with the London silver market also running out of available metal, and traders describing a market that was “all but broken”. The silver market crisis was caused by a combination of factors, including a multi-year solar power boom, a rush to ship metal to the US to beat possible tariffs, and a sudden spike in demand from India, particularly during the Diwali holiday season. For months, Vipin Raina had been bracing for a stampede of buying from Indian customers loading up on silver to honor the Hindu goddess of wealth. image But when it came, he was still blown away. At the start of last week, his company, India’s largest precious metals refinery, ran out of silver stock for the first time in its history. “Most people who are dealing silver and silver coins, they’re literally out of stock because silver is not there,” said Raina, who is head of trading at MMTC-Pamp India Pvt. “This kind of crazy market — where people are buying at these levels — I have not seen in my 27-year career.” Within days, the shortages were being felt not just in India, but around the world. India’s festival buyers were joined by international investors and hedge funds piling into precious metals as a bet on the fragility of the US dollar — or simply to follow the market’s irrepressible surge higher. By the end of last week, the frenzy had rippled across to the London silver market, where global prices are set and where the world’s biggest banks buy and sell in huge quantities. Now, it had run out of available metal. Traders describe a market that was all but broken, where even large banks stepped back from quoting prices as they fielded repeated calls from clients yelling down the line in frustration and exhaustion. This account of how the silver market broke is based on conversations with more than two dozen traders, bankers, refiners, investors and other market participants, many of whom spoke on condition of anonymity as they weren’t authorized to speak publicly. 100-to-1 Ratio When traders and analysts try to pinpoint the immediate cause of the silver crisis of 2025, they inevitably point to India. During the Diwali holiday season, hundreds of millions of devotees buy billions of rupees worth of jewelry to celebrate the goddess Lakshmi. Asia’s refineries usually meet this demand, which typically favors gold. But this year, many Indians turned to a different precious metal: silver. image The pivot wasn’t random. For months, India’s social media stars promoted the idea that after gold’s record rally, silver was next to soar. The hype began in April, when investment banker and content creator Sarthak Ahuja told his nearly 3 million followers that silver’s 100-to-1 price ratio to gold made it the obvious buy this year. His video went viral during Akshaya Tritiya, an auspicious day for buying gold — second only to the Dhanteras festival on Oct. 18. The premiums for silver in India above global prices, usually no more than about a few cents an ounce, started to rise above $0.50, and then above $1, as supplies ran short. And just as Indian demand was soaring, China — a key source of supply — closed for a week-long holiday. So bullion dealers turned to London. They soon discovered that the city’s precious metals vaults were largely sold out. While London vaults underpinning the global market hold more than $36 billion in silver, the majority of it was owned by investors in exchange-traded funds. Demand for silver ETFs has soared in recent months, amid concerns about the stability of the US dollar, a wave of investment that’s become known as the “debasement trade.” Since the start of 2025, ETF investors have hoovered up more than 100 million ounces of silver, according to data compiled by Bloomberg — leaving a dwindling stockpile available to supply the sudden boom in Indian demand. Premiums soared above $5 an ounce, well beyond the normal spread of a few cents. “I have been here in this company for the last 28 years and I have never seen these kind of premiums,” said M.D. Overseas’s Mittal. Panic in London Traders described a growing panic as liquidity dried up. The cost of borrowing silver overnight soared to annualized rates of as high as 200%, according to consultancy Metals Focus. As the big banks that dominate the London market started to step back from the silver market, bid-ask spreads became so wide as to make trading near impossible. In another sign of the disarray in the market, one trader said the big banks were offering such wildly different quotes that he was able to buy from one bank at its ask price and simultaneously sell to another at its bid for an immediate profit – a rare sign of dysfunction in such a large and competitive market. For the past five years, silver demand has outstripped silver supply from mines and recycled metal — in large part thanks to a boom in the solar industry, which uses silver in its photovoltaic cells. Since 2021, demand has outstripped supply by a total of 678 million ounces, according to the Silver Institute, with photovoltaic demand more than doubling over the period. That compares to total inventories in London of around 1.1 billion ounces at the start of 2021. The stress in the silver market has been building since the start of the year, as fears that silver would be ensnared by President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs prompted traders to attempt to front-run any possible levies by shipping more than 200 million ounces of metal into New York warehouses. image On top of the tariff drawdowns, more than 100 million ounces of silver flowed into global ETFs in the year through September, as a wave of investment demand for precious metals supercharged a rally that helped drive gold through $4,000 an ounce for the first time in history. Together, the two trends drained London’s reserves, leaving dangerously little metal available to underpin the roughly 250 million ounces of silver that change hands in the London market every day. Based on Metals Focus estimates, by early October the “free float” of metal not owned by ETFs in the London silver market had dropped to less than 150 million ounces. Silver Falls More Than 6% as Precious Metals Retreat After Rally Also note  Silver fell more than 6% in its biggest drop in six months as the broad precious metals group retreated following a furious rally this week. Concerns eased over credit quality in the US and trade frictions between China and the US, which is denting haven demand for gold and silver. A historic squeeze in the silver market in London is also showing signs of easing, prompting some profit-taking by investors. I see little reason to believe we have seen the end of this rally. There is no fiscal discipline anywhere.   Despite soaring deficits and inflation well above target, the Fed is cutting rates anyway. Do you have faith in the Congress or Trump to address the deficit? Faith in the Fed? Neither do I. And neither do gold or silver. Mon, 10/20/2025 - 14:45
Ill. Gov. JB Pritzker's Tax Docs Show $10.3M Income, $1.4M In "Gambling" Gains Ill. Gov. JB Pritzker's Tax Docs Show $10.3M Income, $1.4M In "Gambling" Gains Nothing says 'in touch with working class Americans' more than casually throwing around millions at casinos...just ask Gov. JB Pritzker... Five months before Democratic primary voters hit the polls, Gov. JB Pritzker — Illinois’ billionaire governor and Hyatt heir — dropped partial tax records showing he and his wife pulled in over $10.3 million in taxable income last year, including a tidy $1.4 million from gambling, https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/10/15/gov-jb-pritzker-and-his-wife-report-10-3-million-in-taxable-income-1-4-million-in-gambling-winnings/ .  As usual, the release came with big numbers and small transparency: Pritzker’s campaign shared only the top pages of his returns, leaving the juicy details of his fortune (and those famously murky trusts) safely out of view. The $10.3 million haul was his biggest in years, up from $3.2 million in 2023 and $2.3 million in 2022 — though still shy of the $18.5 million in 2021. Asked about the jump, a campaign spokesperson offered the usual shrug: “Certain trusts make distributions each year…” image Those same trusts paid $4.5 million to the state and $30.2 million to the feds. The Pritzkers personally kicked in another $1.6 million in federal taxes and $512,000 to Illinois. As for that gambling income, the campaign clarified that “The Governor had winnings and losses from a casino during the year.”  Thanks for that incredible clarification. Meanwhile, his 2026 running mate, Christian Mitchell, made a modest-by-comparison $583,600. Forbes pegs Pritzker’s net worth at $3.9 billion, up a casual $200 million from last year. As for Zero Hedge readers, they appear to be skeptical. One responded to our Tweet pointing out this story by https://x.com/BrometheusPound/status/1978805679822434378 : "Kalshi prediction markets - he took the over on chicago crime." "The gambling income is definitely not bribe money laundering. Definitely not," https://x.com/manwithahammer/status/1978804935555768781 another follower: "Pritzker is gambling every time he bends over to tie his shoes." Pritzker likes to say he’s in a “blind trust,” though experts note it’s not that blind — he still gets enough info to fill out required disclosures. He’s promised to donate any profits from companies with state contracts after leaving office. The governor and his wife also gave $3.3 million to charity last year, doubling their 2023 donations. All told, Pritzker’s political spending remains as massive as his fortune — about half a billion dollars so far, including over $130 million to clobber Darren Bailey in 2022. Not bad for a guy who technically doesn’t take a paycheck from the state. Thu, 10/16/2025 - 09:25