No Crying In The Casino No Crying In The Casino Submitted by Browsing social media last night and this morning, I was greeted with dozens of examples of people posting their “loss porn,” as the Reddit traders would call it, with one P/L after another showing huge losses. Some traders posted ominous things about blowing up their crypto accounts, forced liquidations, and massive losses. Some even also posted, insinuating they were considering self-harm. I posted some examples on my blog . Let’s assume half of these posts are people joking around, and the other half are dead serious. That would be alarming. And so, this weekend is a good time to remember a couple important lessons.First is the fact that things can change any day in the market without notice—as I have been saying for years and explained in my comprehensive wrap-up yesterday after the market closed:  If you’ve been spending the last five years patting yourself on the back over what a genius you are because you have minted it in cryptocurrencies or equities that are trading at 10,000x sales with no net income, perhaps you should reconsider taking to the public forum to air your grievances with how you’ve managed your capital on one particular day.If you’ve spent the last decade shit-posting seasoned investors like Jim Chanos or Peter Schiff on Twitter and just can’t figure out why they can’t see things your way because you’ve always been right, now would be a good place to see if any of their skepticism or warnings about markets can make their way through your blood-brain barrier. If you got smacked around on Friday but didn’t take a total loss, turn a shitty day into an asset by starting to tell yourself the honest truth—you don’t know everything, and none of us do—instead of whatever lie you’ve been telling yourself about how you’re going to be able to outperform forever because you happen to have caught the tail end of a nominal hyperinflationary boom that could very well end in the United States dollar dying while your ego portion of your brain was still mushy and developing, like an infant’s skull. image It’s a great weekend to ask yourself, “Am I quickly disregarding fraud warnings about a company issued by a man who teaches a class on fraud at Yale and who called Enron’s collapse ahead of time?” Or, “Am I quick to ridicule someone’s stance on Bitcoin or gold, despite the fact they’ve been in the game for decades and have amassed enormous personal wealth and one of the best grasps of free-market economics out of anybody in finance today?” If the answer is yes to either of these, maybe it’s time to act a little less like a hyena and a little more like an adult. Buck up. Act like you’ve been here before. Take the pain. Learn from the pain. Come back better. After all, the stock market is an adult game with real wins and real losses. Third, assuming that half of posts like these are real it’s stunning to see, after simply one 3% drawdown in the market—after we have done nothing but rage to all-time highs nonstop since the market plunge in April. It is proof positive that investors have been seduced with insanely unrealistic expectations about risk and how markets work — as I wrote in February:  This, as I have been saying for years, is a product of batshit insane monetary policy—which is set based on keeping the stock market at all-time highs, regardless of the two supposed mandates that the Fed has. Everybody who has been in markets for a couple of decades has learned these lessons the hard way. Nobody knows more about being an arrogant, hubris-filled dickhead and getting a comeuppance multiple times more than I do. At some point, the market humbles you; you throw your hands in the air and surrender to the idea that there are people who know more than you, and that the market and its external driving factors are things that are going to be impossible to always predict. When I was clearing out my old podcast episodes at the beginning of the year, when I decided I wasn’t going to do the podcast anymore, I left a few up for good measure—a few of my select favorites. One of them was a  , how often we’ve done it, and how it is a rite of passage along the way. Skip to about 25 minutes in when we get to it. I left it up in hopes that anybody going through the same thing we had gone through could take some comfort in listening to it. Finally, to the extent posts about self-harm online are serious, I want to speak directly to anybody who’s having such feelings and reassure them we’ve all been there and they are not alone. They can always DM me on Twitter, shoot me a message on , or contact me through other means, and I’ll try to do my best to remind them that, as Joey Knish says in Rounders, it’s not the end of the world. “From time to time, everybody goes bust.” This is the game we choose. Money is not the end of the world and should never be. Would anybody choose to live or die over it, although I realize that’s not the way the world works? And to my longtime followers—what does it say that I’m writing posts urging people thinking about doing the unthinkable not to do so over one 3% drawdown? This is exactly the type of situation I’ve been talking about for years: an unexpected move lower in markets at a time when investors are the least mentally prepared to ever handle it. Hope everybody keeps their head on a swivel and ducks and weaves their way through any continuing volatility this coming week. image QTR’s Disclaimer: Please read my full legal disclaimer   with my best effort to uphold what the license asks, or with the permission of the author. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks or securities, just my opinions. I often lose money on positions I trade/invest in. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time, without further warning. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. I may or may not own names I write about and are watching. Sometimes I’m bullish without owning things, sometimes I’m bearish and do own things. Just assume my positions could be exactly the opposite of what you think they are just in case. If I’m long I could quickly be short and vice versa. I won’t update my positions. All positions can change immediately as soon as I publish this, with or without notice and at any point I can be long, short or neutral on any position. You are on your own. Do not make decisions based on my blog. I exist on the fringe. If you see numbers and calculations of any sort, assume they are wrong and double check them. I failed Algebra in 8th grade and topped off my high school math accolades by getting a D- in remedial Calculus my senior year, before becoming an English major in college so I could bullshit my way through things easier. The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. These are not the opinions of any of my employers, partners, or associates. I did my best to be honest about my disclosures but can’t guarantee I am right; I write these posts after a couple beers sometimes. I edit after my posts are published because I’m impatient and lazy, so if you see a typo, check back in a half hour. Also, I just straight up get shit wrong a lot. I mention it twice because it’s that important. Sat, 10/11/2025 - 17:30
7 Minutes Outside: The Collapse Of Childhood Play 7 Minutes Outside: The Collapse Of Childhood Play (emphasis ours), Studies suggest that today’s kids get an average of   in front of screens. image With a youth mental health crisis also sweeping the nation (rates of anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, and diagnosed mental health disorders like ADHD are all at record highs), it’s not hard to imagine that the correlation between kids’ indoor confinement and their mental health struggles is more than a coincidence. The mental health ramifications of too much screen time are easy to track, and are heavily studied. But the downstream effects of not enough time outside are equally startling. Free play and unstructured time are foundational to a child’s well-being, and in America, our kids aren’t getting it. Seven minutes a day is barely enough time to begin to imagine the premise of a game or an imaginary adventure. Seven minutes a day is barely the amount of time it takes to walk back and forth from the bus stop. It’s not even long enough to go for a walk around the block. Why Aren’t the Kids Outside? The twenty-first century has provided us with a perfect storm of conditions keeping kids away from the outdoors: screens are alluring, the outside is “dangerous,” and parents encourage their kids towards sedentary “for your own good” activities (math olympiad! French tutoring! after school clubs!). Parents fear the dangers of the outdoors. In the modern world, everything from crime statistics to urban design itself lead parents to keep their kids on a short leash. Urban settings don’t have much room for free play; parks and playgrounds and other child-centric outdoor spaces are strangely sparse, as if urban designers wanted a world without kids in it. More apartment complexes are built with dog-washing stations than playgrounds. The modern world seems to have been built by people who forgot what childhood is, and fears of crime keep parents nervous about letting their kids freely use the spaces that do exist. But separate from kid-centric space or the lack thereof, kids are busy. Their days are consumed by ever-expanding school requirements, structured extracurricular activities, and of course the ever-present lure of screen time—to the point that even in suburban neighborhoods with big backyards, kids are barely ever venturing outside. Which is how we end up with kids getting seven to eight hours of screen time a day, but only four to seven minutes of unstructured free time outside—the latter of which people of our grandparents’ generations couldn’t have even imagined. The “unstructured” part is important—“time outside” in a blanket sense isn’t enough. Spending an hour on the field for soccer practice gives kids the benefit of fresh air and sunshine and physical movement, but it isn’t giving them the psychological benefits of free play. Unstructured means time and space away from the rules and instructions of an adult. It exists fully in the wild and whimsical world of the child: free, unimpeded, child-directed, and often tinged with a heavy dose of imagination. There are no set goals of the kind that exist in PE class or a sports club. It’s pure and unfettered, and it’s a biologically hardwired need for children’s development. Mental Health Crisis in Childhood Parents worry about the dangers of the outside world, but what about the dangers of the on-screen world, where grooming and exploitation are common occurrences, where adults behind screens pose as other children and talk to young people too naive to know what to watch out for? What about the physical dangers of a sedentary life? . The poor health of America’s youth has many factors—poor diet, exposure to environmental toxins, a rise in chronic conditions, and countless other variables. But with   around recess at all, neither schools nor parents are consistently defending kids’ free outdoor time. And what about the psychological dangers of not getting time outside to play? . Of course, not all of this traces back to time spent outside, nor lack of it. But as we’re depriving kids of a fundamental part of their development, such a deficit might be at least partially to blame for the negative outcomes that follow. Kids Need Free Play Outdoors As researcher and psychologist Peter Gray says, “Children are designed, by nature, to play and explore on their own, independently of adults.”  ” makes the case for the importance of self-directed time for a child’s development, with ripple effects into everything from academic performance to life outcomes. Gray isn’t alone. As  ,” children need exactly what the term “free range” suggests—the ability to run wild and be free, not cooped up in the cages created by four walls and an adult’s supervision. Skenazy made national headlines after letting her 10-year-old ride the New York City subway home alone (unstructured and unsupervised outdoor time at its finest). Those headlines weren’t the good kind. Reporters were quick to title her “America’s worst mom,” and a media feeding frenzy followed (an unwatched child, normal mere decades prior, had become a scandal). And yet, Skenazy was giving her son what so many others suffer for want of: freedom. Letting your kids have outdoor time doesn’t require something as radical as giving them free range of New York City. Most parents would understandably balk at that. But there’s a wide swath of options between “wander New York City alone” and “have no time outside at all,” and frustratingly few find themselves in that median. Even programs that give kids time outside—things like private schools with on-campus gardens, forest schools, or homeschool groups focused on time in nature—are considered frivolous, peculiar, and radical, respectively. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article-abstract/138/6/e20162207/52571/Strengthening-Early-Intervention-for-Very-Preterm?redirectedFrom=fulltext&utm_source=chatgpt.com?autologincheck=redirected (preferably outdoors) for school-aged children (ages 6–17). These are all recommended baselines from some of America’s most mainstream health authorities. Many independent psychologists, developmental experts, and education researchers would consider those numbers to be the bare minimum. Charlotte Mason, the nineteenth-century British educator whose methodology is still used today by large swaths of homeschoolers, argued that children should spend four to six hours a day outside whenever possible: “Never be within doors when you can rightly be without.” Mason didn’t see outdoor time as “recess,” but as a fundamental part of a child’s education in its own right. For the early years, she considered it even more important than formal instruction, helping children develop their attentiveness, wonder, and observational skills. She advocated nature walks, observations of weather patterns and wildlife, keeping a nature journal, and long uninterrupted swaths of free play. This unstructured playtime is part of the whimsy of childhood, but it also plays a critical role. Free play supports kids’ cognitive development, imagination, and executive function. Physical activity develops strength, coordination, and motor skills, and is shown to reduce anxiety. Studies suggest exposure to the microbiome of the dirt leads to a  . Exposure to natural sunlight supports a child’s natural circadian rhythm. And of course, exposure to sunlight also improves vitamin D levels—the lack of which can cause everything from fatigue and a weakened immune system to, you guessed it, anxiety and depression. Our kids are struggling, physically and psychologically, for want of time for free play and time outdoors. That fresh air and freedom, no matter how basic it seems, is fundamental to their health and success, as necessary to their health (if not their survival) as air and water. Our parents and grandparents knew this by intuition; our forebears never considered it could even be a question, but our culture has slowly let it erode to become only the tiniest fraction of our kids’ lives. Free play and time outdoors is indivisible from health and success. If we want to raise a healthy, happy, and thriving generation, then their outdoor time is a resource we must defend. From the (AIER) Sat, 10/11/2025 - 16:20
Market Crack Or Beginning Of Something Bigger Market Crack Or Beginning Of Something Bigger Market Crack Or The Beginning Of Something Bigger The data had been sending signals that few wanted to acknowledge all week. Speculative behavior had reached extremes, valuations were stretched, and positioning was one-sided. Retail traders had returned to chasing options and meme stocks with the same recklessness seen in 2021. As we noted previously, the speculative behavior had reached records on many levels. image As recently noted by Goldman Sachs: “In fact, if you look at the spread of single stock volatility to index volatility, it’s at one of the widest levels we have ever seen.” image Furthermore, systematic flows had increased equity exposure, reinforcing a feedback loop of rising prices and falling volatility. Many algorithmic trading strategies are volatility-sensitive; therefore, when markets trend upward with low volatility, these strategies increase exposure. This creates a feedback loop where price action drives further buying. image However, when volatility spikes or prices fall, the same models reverse direction and sell, potentially accelerating a downturn, which is why the market crack on Friday was so severe. In fact, we warned about the potential of this event in Friday mornings  . To wit: “While we are not bearish on the market currently, the risk is building that a correction will occur. Unfortunately, given the high levels of complacency and offside positioning, the selloff could be sharper than many expect. Furthermore, given the high levels of investor sentiment, a downturn of 10% will “feel” much worse than it actually is. It is in these environments where investors make the most mistakes.” image Lastly, retail trading volume had climbed significantly, focusing on leveraged ETFs and meme stocks. Many trades are based on social media narratives, not balance sheet strength or revenue forecasts. This shift in behavior to chasing poor fundamentals and high volatility stocks has historically marked peaks, not bottoms. image The setup was classic: overconfidence, leverage, concentration, and it only needed a trigger. Trump’s tariff comments became the catalyst, but the fragility was already embedded. High-growth names, semiconductors, and thematic ETFs bore the brunt. Defensive sectors caught a bid, while yields fell as traders rushed to safety. This wasn’t a crash but a market crack that happens when everyone is on the same side of the boat. On Friday, the same crowd that had been relentlessly pushing prices higher moved in the other direction. The reason the market crack was so severe reflects our previous comments that  “The stock market is always a function of buyers and sellers, each negotiating to make a transaction. While there is a buyer for every seller, the question is always at “what price?”  In the current bull market, few people are willing to sell, so buyers must keep bidding up prices to attract a seller to make a transaction. As long as this remains the case and exuberance exceeds logic, buyers will continue to pay higher prices to get into the positions they want to own. Such is the very definition of the “greater fool” theory. However, at some point, for whatever reason, this dynamic will change. Buyers will become more scarce as they refuse to pay a higher price. When sellers realize the change, they will rush to sell to a diminishing pool of buyers. Eventually, sellers will begin to “panic sell” as buyers evaporate and prices plunge.” Whether this reversal deepens depends on what comes next. Earnings, macro data (if it arrives), and liquidity could offset the fears of trade escalation. But the takeaway is clear: the market crack puts investors at risk of a deeper corrective cycle if near-term supports fail. Was This The Beginning Of The End? Was Friday’s market crack the beginning of the end of the melt-up phase? That answer is probably “no.” Paul Tudor Jones recently highlighted the dual nature of the current environment. He expects a powerful rally ahead, but also warned that we are entering the final stages of the bull market as a market melt-up ensues. While his views were that gains would be frontloaded, they would be followed by a violent reversal. Of course, such should be unsurprising, as that is how all speculative market phases and meltups eventually end. However, that does not mean markets would have some volatility along the way. As Jones noted, the final year of a market meltup often produces the most substantial gains. But even those gains tend to come with some increased volatility. We see this in the parallels to 1999 that we discussed last week.  “Every bubble has a story at its core. In 1999, that story was the internet: a transformational technology that would reshape commerce, communications, and culture. Investors saw the future, bid prices into the stratosphere, and assumed profits would inevitably follow. In 2025, the story is artificial intelligence, which carries the same irresistible promise of reshaping industries, creating productivity booms, and unlocking new frontiers. The parallels are hard to miss, along with the current price action. Like the dot-com era, today’s market is being driven by breathtaking growth assumptions. Back then, Cisco traded north of 100x earnings on the belief it was selling the “backbone of the internet.” Pets.com and Webvan raised hundreds of millions, only to collapse when business models proved unsustainable. The psychology, then and now, is driven by the “fear of missing out.” Investors rush in because the narrative is too powerful to ignore: However, “if AI changes everything, you can’t afford not to own it.“ image The market crack has likely not broken the critical tailwind of the bull market as liquidity remains abundant. Fiscal deficits are large, the Fed remains dovish, and global central banks are cutting rates. All of these support continued price appreciation, but the same ingredients that drive the melt-up create instability. That instability was made evident in the market crack on Friday. The reversal on Friday has not broken the bullish trend, yet. For investors, the risk is not in being wrong directionally, but in timing. Such is why over the last few weeks, we have repeatedly discussed the market’s negative divergences, the risk of chasing momentum, and the offside positioning of investors in general. As is always the case, momentum markets reward participation until they don’t. When everyone is positioned similarly, reversals have no buffer, the exits are narrower, and the market cracks are larger. This is particularly the case with virtually every asset class hitting all-time highs, from large-cap stocks to international and emerging markets to gold and bitcoin. Everyone has a “narrative” about why their particular asset of choice is rising; however, they can’t all be correct. Furthermore, the eventual reversal is also correlated when all asset classes become highly correlated. The Risks Of Narratives As noted, everyone has a narrative for why their favorite asset class is going higher. Leon Cooperman recently warned that we have entered the phase of the bull market that Warren Buffett feared most. He cited Buffett’s warning: “Once a market reaches the point where everyone makes money regardless of strategy, the crowd shifts from rational investing to fear of missing out.” In Cooperman’s view, earnings or interest rate dynamics no longer support the rally; it is just the price action itself. Investors are buying only because prices are rising. That kind of behavior never ends well. As he discussed, valuations, like the Buffett Indicator, and crowd behavior, are key reasons for concern. The Buffett Indicator, the ratio of total market capitalization to GDP, has crossed 200 percent. That level exceeds historical extremes, suggesting that the tether between equities and the real economy broke. Furthermore, Simon White at Bloomberg recently noted that we have entered the  regime. “At the end of a stock-market rally, just before a consolidation or a correction, there is typically a period where the market reacts positively to bad news. That’s a regime we just entered. Calling a precise top is a mug’s game, but it is often quite clear when a market is in the process of making a top. There are several reasons to think that is the case today, and we now have another one to add to the pot. Towards the end of uptrends, stocks typically start to react positively even to bad economic news. This is generally due to the reaction function of the Federal Reserve, where the market assumes it is more likely policy will be loosened as the economy weakens so, somewhat perversely, the equity market ignores the slowdown and rallies on the expectation of looser financial conditions.” image As he concludes: “Previous times around the last three major market tops, this regime has been in play. It is often preceded by a “good news is good news” regime (white line in chart), where stocks intuitively rally when it looks like the economy is strengthening. If we roll the chart further back, it shows the “bad news is good news” regime was in play before the 2011 and 2015 tops, too. However, there are a couple of caveats. Firstly, as we can see above, the “bad news is good” regimes can last for several months before the market corrects. This time could be no different. Secondly, in the 2000s and 2010s there were several periods where the “bad news is good” regime came mid-cycle, ie, in the middle of the rally. It’s possible that’s the case today, but with potentially huge overinvestment in the AI sphere, all-time high valuations, and increasing signs of speculative froth, you wouldn’t want to bank on it.“ As we saw on Friday, small shocks can create significant price moves in these environments when fundamentals no longer anchor pricing. Bob Farrell once noted that crowd behavior is naturally unstable; “when all experts agree, something else tends to happen.”  All the “experts” and investors expect higher prices on everything. That one-sided bias, and most importantly, “rationalized narratives” to justify overpaying for an asset, increases the probability that even minor disappointments cause outsized reactions. This is not about fear. It is about risk math. Expected returns are lower, volatility is rising, and the asymmetry now favors caution. 🔑 Key Catalysts Next Week The economic calendar for the upcoming week was expected to provide critical updates on inflation and wage growth. However, due to the ongoing government shutdown, the release of major reports from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Census Bureau is uncertain. If not resolved by early next week, most federal economic data, including CPI and PPI, will be delayed. That removes essential guidance at a time when investor positioning is heavily dependent on a soft-landing narrative. Below is the updated calendar, based on current scheduling and shutdown contingencies: image Markets will monitor any resolution to the shutdown early in the week. There is little hope of any resolution to the shutdown this coming week, so traders will be forced to rely on Fed guidance and earnings to interpret macro conditions. Speaking of earnings, they will likely carry more influence than usual. With macro data paused, forward guidance and margin commentary from large-cap tech, semiconductors, and banks will shape sentiment. If guidance softens or margins compress, equity markets could face pressure, particularly with positioning heavy in AI and high-beta growth. Without inflation data, volatility could increase as investor expectations become more speculative. Rate assumptions are increasingly disconnected from policy statements. Once released, that gap may close quickly if CPI or PPI points away from disinflation. Until then, markets will be trading on limited visibility. Sat, 10/11/2025 - 15:10
Watch: MSM Puppets Receive "New Talking Point Directive" Amid Info War Watch: MSM Puppets Receive "New Talking Point Directive" Amid Info War  Establishment media puppets that align with the Deep State interests have received coordinated messaging directives this past week,  scripted talking points designed to advance ongoing informational warfare against the American public to obscure or downplay the very existence and activities of radical left group Antifa, which has been formally designated a domestic terrorist organization due to its repeated attacks on federal personnel, facilities, and other government assets.  "New talking point directive just issued," journalist Tom Elliott wrote on X, accompanying a montage video showing leftist media puppets, from Jimmy Kimmel to Whoopi Goldberg, reading from what appears to be identical scripts in a coordinated misinformation and disinformation campaign. By now, the but as a massive PR arm serving the interests of Deep State operatives. New talking point directive just issued https://twitter.com/hashtag/AntifaDoesntExist?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw — Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) But ...  image Related: reminds folks that the Democratic Socialists of America is effectively Antifa. With that in mind, the coordinated misinformation campaign by the MSM now makes a little more sense. REMINDER: The DSA = ANTIFA — Jason Curtis Anderson (@JCAndersonNYC) While President Trump and the White House are full steam ahead in their quest to "dismantle Antifa"...  We will dismantle Antifa. https://t.co/13bmUauJJm — Stephen Miller (@StephenM) We must remind readers that during the Antifa roundtable at the White House on Wednesday, , correctly advised that the proper strategy to dismantle radical leftist networks is not to target Antifa directly at first, but to begin by disrupting and dismantling the dark-money-billionaire-funded NGOs to fund the permanent protest industrial complex that unleashed endless color revolution-style operations against President Trump. He emphasized that a web of leftist billionaires and foreign-backed entities has exploited the NGO world for a sinister agenda.  Whoa ( ). image Listen to Bruner.  Way more than $100M of US taxpayer money — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) The same people who told you that Biden's mental acuity was strong, that Covid came from nature, that there was no southern border crisis, no inflation, and that Hunter Biden's laptop was "Russian disinformation" are now pushing yet another coordinated misinformation campaign. . . .  Sat, 10/11/2025 - 14:35
Nobel Peace Prize Organizers Probing Potential Insider Trades On Polymarket Nobel Peace Prize Organizers Probing Potential Insider Trades On Polymarket The organizers of the Nobel Peace Prize are investigating whether insiders used privileged information about this year’s winner to profit on crypto prediction market Polymarket, according to local reports. image Jørgen Watne Frydnes, chair of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, displays a photo of winner María Corina Machado on his smartphone in Oslo on Friday © Rodrigo Freitas/NTB/AFP/Getty Images Roughly 11 hours before the closely watched award was given to Venezuelan resistance leader Maria Corina Machado this morning, the odds of her victory surged from near-zero to over 70% on Polymarket.  The market on this year’s Nobel Peace Prize winner has accumulated over $21.4 million in trading volume since opening in July. For nearly all of that time, the odds of Machado receiving the coveted prize have hovered around a 1% or 2% likelihood.  Then, Thursday night, shortly before 1:00 am Norway time, the Venezualan’s odds of winning surged to over 43%. By 2:00 am, they hit 73%. image The identity of the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize -one of the most coveted awards in the world - is typically kept tightly under wraps. Even Machado herself did not find out she had won the award until minutes before the news was announced publicly in Oslo at 11:00 am this morning.  The five-member   tasked with selecting the award’s winner did not even come to a decision until this week, according to local reports. But somehow, Polymarket traders appeared clued-in to their decision ahead of today’s flashy announcement. The action appears to have kicked off at roughly 12:45 am Norway time this morning, when a   on the site began betting thousands of dollars on the likelihood of Machado’s victory. Over the next several hours, they continued to buy and sell thousands of dollars worth of Machado positions, until they eventually redeemed $80,000 when the market resolved.  Their account was created within the last 10 days, according to the Polymarket site.  A spokesperson for the Nobel Institute did not immediately respond to Decrypt’s request for comment regarding what would happen if someone within or connected to the prize committee is found to have used insider information about the award to make a profit. But while such activity may be looked down upon within such secretive organizations, it is widely considered a good thing in the world of prediction markets. The ultimate goal of prediction markets tends to be accurate information,  , and Polymarket users were ultimately clued into this morning’s breaking news the night before.  Polymarket’s  , meanwhile, do not appear to restrict users’ use of insider or privileged information while making wagers. A representative for the company did not immediately respond to Decrypt’s request for comment on this story.  Sat, 10/11/2025 - 14:00
Rare Blackouts Hit Southern Odessa Region Amid Russia's Pre-Winter Strikes Rare Blackouts Hit Southern Odessa Region Amid Russia's Pre-Winter Strikes Rare blackouts have occurred in Ukraine's southern Odessa region - a place which has largely been spared from sustained fighting - given the vital port is all the way to the south, across from the border with NATO member Romania. This latest overnight Russian assault again targeted Ukraine's energy grid ahead of winter, with hundreds of thousands of households losing power in the attack. image "Last night, the enemy attacked energy and civilian infrastructure in the Odesa region," regional governor Oleh Kiper confirmed on Telegram. "Power engineers are making every effort to fully restore the power supply," he added. To give a sense of just how vast the outage was, Ukrainian energy firm DTEK later said it was able to restore power to over 240,000 households in the region, but with many more still in need of help. Just within the 24-hour prior, the Kyiv area also experienced rare blackouts, along with many other regions, after a key electrical generation plant was directly struck by either missiles or drones. Reuters has attempted to calculate the scale of the prior Thursday to Friday overnight attack https://www.newsmax.com/globaltalk/russia-attack-ukraine/2025/10/10/id/1229830/ : The Russian massive attack on Ukraine's energy system on Friday caused temporary power cuts to more than one million consumers across the country, Reuters calculations based on local authorities data showed. At least 420,000 families in the capital of Kyiv were affected, Ukrainian private energy firm DTEK said, announcing that power was restored. President Zelensky called that prior major aerial assault on the capital a "cynical and calculated attack" and there are   that a seven-year old boy was killed. Russia has at this begun to launch missile and drones into Ukraine into the hundreds on a nightly basis, mainly targeting energy sites but also military centers. But these projectiles frequently also hit residential buildings and civilian neighborhoods. The attacks have gone the other way too, but with less devastation. Ukraine has been sending drones into Russian territory nightly, frequently hitting oil facilities and manufacturing centers. Sat, 10/11/2025 - 13:25
Wind, Solar Projects Can Stick Taxpayers With The Tab Coming And Going Wind, Solar Projects Can Stick Taxpayers With The Tab Coming And Going , When it comes to our energy future, it is often true that what many on the left consider an enlightened long-term view is in fact short-sightedness that fails to reflect the full consequences of their actions.   image Such is the case with the liberal media’s fawning over the Republican governor of Wyoming for his embrace of “alternatives,” including a glowing profile last year on CBS’   for his advocacy for wind turbines. “Wyoming Gov. Mark Gordon pursues green, carbon-negative agenda in one of the nation’s reddest states,” trumpeted the online version of the piece.  Many Wyoming residents are not on board, including from his own party. The state GOP   into 2025.   For Gordon and others, “Wyoming is very windy” seems to be the simplified justification for erecting unsightly wind turbines across the landscape. But what makes a Republican official’s championing of wind or solar concerning is not so much his belief in the (dubious) effectiveness of the energy source as appearing to brush aside the actual cost to taxpayers.   How many wind and solar farms have sprung up across the U.S.? Estimates show nearly 1,400 utility-scale  ).   It’s important to understand the vast array of individual wind and solar components because someday, starting in the not-too-distant future, they will individually wear out. What happens then?  According to https://windexchange.energy.gov/end-of-service-guide  many turbines are already nearing end-life status, meaning they will either need “repowered” or decommissioned. “The time to disassemble, demolish, and remove wind turbine components and wind energy project-related infrastructure and conduct restoration activities can be 6–24 months, depending on the size of the turbines and the number of turbines involved in the project,” according to government guidelines.   For solar installations, the issue is even more pressing. “By 2030, the United States will need to manage around one million tons of solar panel waste,” according to  . “This number is expected to grow to 10 million tons by 2050, making the U.S. the second-largest producer of solar panel waste globally. Currently, only about 10% of decommissioned panels are properly recycled, despite containing valuable materials like silver, silicon, and aluminum.”  Proponents of “alternatives” insist that the costs for decommissioning wind and solar installations are typically assumed by companies through agreements negotiated at the time of construction. That’s small comfort considering that more than 100 solar companies have gone bankrupt in recent years, including residential, community solar projects and utility-scale installations. The year 2024 “saw an uptick in bankruptcy filings in each of these three sub-categories,” according to  .  When that happens, taxpayers, of course, can be left holding the bag, even in cases where companies were required to secure bonds or other sureties in case of their demise. The fact that each state has different rules and varying levels of accountability complicates the picture. And the Biden administration’s lenient posture toward “renewables” leaves taxpayers with real reason for concern.   The   recently discovered that “in 2021, the Biden Interior Department’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) waived the customary financial assurance for decommissioning on the lease of the Vineyard Wind project off the Massachusetts coast.” Subsequently, “Documents recently obtained by FGI show how much taxpayers are on the hook for if Vineyard Wind can’t afford to decommission: $191 million.”  Gov. Gordon insists he is taking an “all of the above” approach to energy. To be sure, Wyoming remains the nation’s top coal producer and a leading oil and natural gas provider. But “all of the above” is less appealing when we acknowledge that wind and solar projects exist largely thanks to taxpayer largesse.    kicked in for “renewables,” which cost taxpayers $31.4 billion in 2024 and were projected to cost over $421 billion from 2025 through 2034, until the Trump administration began rolling back as many projects as possible. When it comes to “alternatives,” taxpayers were forced to put up billions in subsidies to build them, and will possibly be on the hook for untold costs to demolish them.   It is not unreasonable to fear that the coming solar and wind graveyards could be America’s next superfund cleanup burden. Politicians from the right and left who bask in the temporary glow of mainstream media approbation for embracing the “renewables” movement will eventually be held to account when the sun sets on the solar economy, and when our tax dollars are gone with the wind.  Gary Abernathy is a longtime newspaper editor, reporter and columnist. He was a contributing columnist for the Washington Post from 2017-2023 and a frequent guest analyst across numerous media platforms. He is a contributing columnist for  , which advocates for realistic approaches to energy consumption and environmental conservation. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Empowerment Alliance or ZeroHedge. Sat, 10/11/2025 - 12:50
Crypto Carnage: Trump Tariff Tape-Bomb Triggers Largest Liquidation Event In History Crypto Carnage: Trump Tariff Tape-Bomb Triggers Largest Liquidation Event In History Crypto market traders were hit by record liquidations just days after Bitcoin touched an all-time high, after President Trump triggered a wave of cross-market volatility saying he would impose an additional tariff on China and export controls on software. image October has historically been a particularly strong month for Bitcoin’s price - a longstanding pattern that has led much of the crypto industry to expect the same results come every fall. The trend at first seemed poised to continue this year; the first week of this month, BTC surged some 10.5% to a new all-time high price north of $126,000. Bitcoin plunged to $105,000 - its lowest since June - following Trump's aft-hours tweet yesterday... image ...before bouncing back above $112,000 image Ethereum was also clubbed like a baby seal... image But that was the least of it as dozens of so-called alt-coins saw almost total wipe-outs. image , traders betting big on the bull run suffered to an extent never seen in crypto market history. Data from   indicates that 24-hour liquidations reached nearly $20 billion, with long positions comprising the vast majority. Coinglass described this as “the largest liquidation event in crypto history.” Over the past 24 hours, bets worth more than $19 billion have been wiped out, and more than 1.6 million traders liquidated, according to Coinglass data. More than $7 billion of those positions were sold in less than one hour of trading on Friday. image “The actual total is likely much higher — Binance only reports one liquidation order per second,” CoinGlass   on X about the figures. The $19.31 billion in liquidations is more than ten times the losses seen during the COVID-19 crash ($1.2 billion) and the FTX collapse ($1.6 billion). Crypto.com CEO Kris Marszalek has called for a regulatory investigation into exchanges that suffered the largest losses following a record $20 billion in crypto liquidations over the past 24 hours. In a Saturday   during the crash. “Regulators should look into the exchanges that had most liquidations in the last 24 hours,” he wrote. “Any of them slowing down to a halt, effectively not allowing people to trade? Were all trades priced correctly and in line with indexes?” Data from CoinGlass shows that Hyperliquid led all exchanges in liquidations, recording $10.31 billion in wiped-out positions. It was followed by Bybit with $4.65 billion, and Binance with $2.41 billion. Other major platforms like OKX, HTX and Gate saw smaller totals, at $1.21 billion, $362.5 million and $264.5 million, respectively. image Exchange order-book liquidity showed a severe imbalance between bids and asks - resistance was stacked around $120,000, while little support was in place to prevent a fresh dive toward the $100,000 mark. image Perhaps the most impacted asset of the day was Trump’s own crypto token. WLFI, the native token of World Liberty Financial, the Trump family’s crypto platform, plummeted almost 50% immediately following the president’s China announcement, to just south of $0.10 a token. It has since partially recovered to $0.13... image David Jeong, chief executive officer at Tread.fi, an algorithmic crypto trading platform for institutional traders, said the market was experiencing a “black swan event.” “It is likely that many institutions did not expect this level of volatility and with how leveraged perpetual futures are designed, many large traders, including institutions, would have gotten liquidated,” he said. Perpetual futures are a type of contract with no expiration, and are used by crypto traders to trade leveraged positions around the clock. The next major support level for Bitcoin is $100,000, according to Caroline Mauron, co-founder of Orbit Markets, below which “would signal the end of past three-year bull cycle.” Vincent Liu, chief investment officer at Kronos Research, said the rout was “sparked by US-China tariff fears but fueled by institutional over-leverage.” “This highlights crypto’s macro ties,” he said. “Expect volatility, but watch for rebound signals in cleared markets.” Bitcoin options market reflected Mauron’s views with highest number of ‘put’ or sell strikes at $110,000 and next highest at $100,000, according to data on Deribit platform. image “The focus now turns to counterparty exposure and whether this triggers broader market contagion,” said Brian Strugats, head trader at Multicoin Capital. He added that some estimates place total liquidations above $30 billion. Ahead of all this carnage, US spot Bitcoin ETFs continued their strong “Uptober” performance with $2.71 billion in weekly inflows, marking another strong week for institutional demand. “Capital keeps flowing into BTC as allocators double down on the digital gold conviction trade. Liquidity is building now as the market momentum takes shape,” Vincent Liu, chief investment officer at quantitative trading firm Kronos Research, told Cointelegraph. image Obviously, these flows came before the after-hours collapse that triggered the massive liquidations, but we are seeing a bid return in quiet Saturday trading. “Trump’s tariff threat looks more like a negotiation tactic than a policy pivot, classic pressure play,” Liu said. “Markets may flinch short term, but smart money knows the game: macro noise, conviction unchanged,” he added. Finally, that stablecoin demand in China offers valuable insight into traders’ positioning. When investors rush to exit the cryptocurrency market, stablecoins typically trade at a 0.5% or greater discount compared with the official US dollar/CNY rate. image Tether (USDT/CNY) vs. US dollar/CNY. Source: OKX Tether had been trading at a slight discount since Wednesday, suggesting traders were previously cashing out as Bitcoin struggled to maintain bullish momentum. However, the metric returned to parity after BTC fell below $120,000, indicating that traders are no longer eager to exit the crypto market. Sat, 10/11/2025 - 12:15
Telegram's Durov: We're "Running Out Of Time To Save The Free Internet" Messaging app Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov warns that a “dark, dystopian world” is approaching, with governments worldwide rolling back privacy protections. image “I’m turning 41, but I don’t feel like celebrating. Our generation is running out of time to save the free internet built for us by our fathers,”   Durov in an X post on Thursday. “Once-free countries are introducing dystopian measures,” said Durov, referencing the   proposal, digital IDs in the UK and new rules requiring online age checks to access social media in Australia. “What was once the promise of the free exchange of information is being turned into the ultimate tool of control.” “Germany is persecuting anyone who dares to criticize officials on the Internet. The UK is imprisoning thousands for their tweets. France is criminally investigating tech leaders who defend freedom and privacy.”   “A dark, dystopian world is approaching fast — while we’re asleep. Our generation risks going down in history as the last one that had freedoms — and allowed them to be taken away,” Pavel added. image Source:  Privacy protections are a cornerstone of Bitcoin and the broader cryptocurrency industry. Bitcoin was   to operate pseudonymously, using addresses instead of names, and allowing peer-to-peer transactions without the involvement of banks, among other measures. Germany may have blocked the EU’s Chat Control EU lawmakers were set to vote on the Chat Control law next week, which critics   and people’s right to privacy as it requires services such as Telegram, WhatsApp and Signal to allow regulators to screen messages before they are encrypted and sent. The legislation, however, has been dealt a heavy blow, with the head of  . The president of messaging app Signal, Meredith Whittaker,   on Thursday that while Germany’s opposition to the measure is a relief, she warns that “the war is not over,” because it now moves to “the European Council, where the issue is unresolved.” image Source:  She also warns that any further attempts to enact similar measures allowing the scanning of content should be opposed because it negates encryption and also creates “a dangerous backdoor.” “The technical consensus is clear: you can’t create a backdoor that only lets the 'good guys' in. However they're dressed up, these proposals create cybersecurity loopholes that hackers and hostile nations are eagerly waiting to exploit .” UK’s Digital ID has sparked concerns, too UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer   a digital ID scheme in September, which would require citizens to prove their right to live and work in the country. The government is pushing the measure as a way to combat illegal workers, while also cutting down wait times to verify identities and gain access to government services, such as licenses, childcare, welfare and tax. Critics argue that the scheme raises privacy concerns as individuals would be   to be stored on a government app, and it would be too easy for the government to misuse it. Over 2.8 million people have already   a petition opposing the introduction of a digital ID. Petitions that gain more than 100,000 signatures have to be considered for debate in Parliament. Australia’s online age verification system raises privacy issues as well Australia will https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/industry-regulation/social-media-age-restrictions  access to social media platforms for users under 16 from Dec. 10, and one of the measures floated to enforce the ban has been an online digital age verification system. Lawmakers in the country argue that the scheme will protect minors from harmful content online. However, critics share similar privacy concerns with the UK system, namely that it could lead to government misuse and create privacy issues around the storage of data.  Sat, 10/11/2025 - 11:40
Watch: MSM Interview Covers Up Ukrainian Fighter's Swastika Tattoo Watch: MSM Interview Covers Up Ukrainian Fighter's Swastika Tattoo In another embarrassing and revealing moment for Western mainstream media and its many puff pieces on Ukraine's neo-Nazi Azov Regiment, Canadian national broadcaster CBC has aired a news report this week from "an elite training facility" of its 3rd Assault Brigade in Kiev, featuring a fighter with a swastika tattoo on his arm. The footage, released Thursday, blurred out the swastika tattoo of one of the main military trainers interviewed, but failed to do so in the video’s YouTube thumbnail. Comments were turned off, with a note attached in the YouTube description which reads: "A tattoo of an offensive symbol has been blurred in this video." Watch (officer with tattoo starts at :16 mark) It was in June 2024 that the US State Department first   that it had lifted its longtime ban on giving weapons and training to Ukraine's notorious Azov Brigade (often referenced by its earlier name Azov Battalion). Since then, efforts to normalize Azov—which mainstream media had long ago grudgingly   was full of "neo-Nazi ideology"—have only grown. The group's members have never been shy about sporting Nazi-inspired tattoos and patches. Ultimately, they haven't changed, only their Western supporters' perceptions of them have.  The blurred out tattoo in question from the CBC footage: image Ukrainian scholar and historian,  : “Azov changed” – the mantra of many liberal and progressive public in the West, who, after 24 Feb. 2022, demonstrate sympathy toward the Azov movement, whitewashing its past, justifying its present, and showing no concerns about its future. Just this month, Ukraine's President Zelensky promoted Azov's founder, Andriy Biletsky, to the rank of Brigadier General, amid these efforts to downplay or cover up the group's clear neo-Nazi ideology. Sat, 10/11/2025 - 11:05