Google Says Users Removed Over COVID-19 Views Can Rejoin YouTube Google Says Users Removed Over COVID-19 Views Can Rejoin YouTube (emphasis ours), YouTube creators who were removed over their views concerning COVID-19 or the 2020 election can rejoin the service, Google and its parent company, Alphabet, said in a Sept. 23 letter. image Rules in place prohibiting some discussion of COVID-19 and the election were lifted in 2023 or 2024, Google through its lawyers. “Today, YouTube’s Community Guidelines allow for a wider range of content regarding COVID-19 and elections integrity,” it stated. “Reflecting the Company’s commitment to free expression, YouTube will provide an opportunity for all creators to rejoin the platform if the Company terminated their channels for repeated violations of COVID-19 and elections integrity policies that are no longer in effect.” People whose channels were or taken down included Dan Bongino, the current deputy director of the FBI. The company said it values conservative content creators and recognizes they regularly land compelling interviewers with politicians, business leaders, and others. Google described the COVID-19 pandemic as an unprecedented time that forced online platforms to “balance freedom of expression” with moderation of content “that could result in real-world harm.” The situation was complicated by top officials in the Biden administration pressuring the company to take action against certain COVID-19 content “that did not violate its policies,” it said. “It is unacceptable and wrong when any government, including the Biden Administration, attempts to dictate how the Company moderates content, and the Company has consistently fought against those efforts on First Amendment grounds,” the company stated. YouTube’s medical content policies evolved throughout the pandemic, as health authorities changed their guidance, the company said. The company is now allowing a wide range of content on COVID-19 and elections. “In contrast to other large platforms, YouTube has not operated a fact-checking program that identifies and compensates fact-checking partners to produce content to support moderation,” the letter states. “YouTube has not and will not empower fact-checkers to take action on or label content across the Company’s services.” The letter was sent to Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), chairman of House of Representatives Judiciary Committee. “Whether you were an established YouTube presence with a massive following like Dan Bongino or just were starting out to express political views there, YOU will have an opportunity to come back onto the platform if you were censored for engaging in political speech,” Jordan wrote on X. “This is another victory in the fight against censorship.” Google did not respond to a request for comment. Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, Facebook’s parent company, in 2024 that the company was pressured by top Biden administration officials “to censor certain COVID-19 content, including humor and satire, and expressed a lot of frustration with our teams when we didn’t agree.” Ultimately, he wrote, it was up to the company to take down or leave up the content. “I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it,” Zuckerberg added later. Documents the case, finding the states did not show they were directly harmed by the efforts. Tue, 09/23/2025 - 21:45
"A Profoundly Damaged Cohort": Understanding And Saving Gen Z To Save America "A Profoundly Damaged Cohort": Understanding And Saving Gen Z To Save America , Generation Z, those born between 1997 and 2012, stands as a profoundly damaged cohort, scarred by ideological indoctrination, social media’s corrosive grip, marginalization of morality anchors like religion and families, and a narcissistic culture that breeds entitlement. Gen Z’s alarming psychological fragility – hypersensitivity to “microaggressions,” equating words with violence, and an obsession with censoring “misinformation” – amplifies their vulnerability to a perverse rationale for violence. This was starkly illustrated by the assassination of Charlie Kirk on Sept. 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University, while he engaged in civil debate, essential to a free, peaceful society. image Gen Z’s fragility is shocking to those of us who grew up with brave parents who fought in world wars and who immigrated with nothing but a strong will to live free. Gen Z focuses on perceived harms from words, demanding censorship for protection, with engaging in unfollowing or blocking, the online version of intolerant mob behavior. This betrays a psychological frailty that undermines resilience and prevents discourse necessary for peaceful coexistence. Gen Z’s dysfunction is undeniable. They average , driven by a victimhood culture amplified by social media. Gen Z’s psychological frailty sets the stage for unique vulnerability to social receive support from LGBT organizations versus 51% during transition, a shameful abandonment of distressed young people. To understand the remedy, we must first acknowledge the causes. Never forget that the COVID-19 pandemic mismanagement inflicted catastrophic damage on Gen Z, an epic loss of society’s moral compass that left Gen Z adrift. Professors, teachers, and doctors backed isolation, disregarding known to youth mental health. Inflammatory rhetoric from America’s left has influenced this weakened generation and likely inspired violence. Is it only a coincidence that members of Gen Z assassinated Charlie Kirk, attempted to kill President Trump, shot up schools, and murdered United Healthcare’s CEO? Media bias is stark and <a href="http://www.mrc.org/" rel="nofollow">quantifiable</a>: from 2016 to 2025, “extreme right” or “far right” mentions outnumbered “extreme left” or “far left” 5:1 (~12,000, with ~6 billion views, vs. ~2,500 with ~1.25 billion views); some, like MSNBC at 18:1 and PBS at 42:1, were far worse. Extreme demonization of Trump or MAGA conservatives as “ ” or “threat to democracy” – MSNBC’s ~10,500 segments (~5.2 billion views), The New York Times’ ~620 mentions (~310 million views), and President Joe Biden’s 2022 Philadelphia speech, where he declared that “Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic,” a message reiterated in over 15 major addresses from 2020–2025  – has legitimized violent action. Gen Z is naturally influenced by professors, but today’s professors are steeped in extremism rather than a force for free debate. We should be alarmed at ; 63% of students accept shouting down speakers, 34% deem violence acceptable to suppress speech (up from 20% in 2020), and 48% justify political violence. Elite university leadership continues to abrogate its responsibility by ignoring Charlie Kirk’s assassination. Not a single Top 20 school offered any mental health support despite obvious on-campus impact, in contrast with extensive wellness outreach for their left-favored crises, including George Floyd’s death and both of President Trump’s elections. Some call for legal, top-down interventions, but ultimately, it is individuals, not institutions, who will save freedom. Despite their damaged psyches, the durable solution is present in Gen Z itself. Charlie Kirk knew that and devoted his life to fearlessly engaging Gen Z in debate. That empowered his audience to think critically about liberty, morality, and truth. Charlie’s death sparked 50,000+ TPUSA chapter requests in six days – their thirst for dialogue is evident. In that spirit, we must continue to challenge inquisitive students with ideas they may never have heard. And we should identify and mentor Gen Z’s bold, rising leaders in early careers who’ve shown a commitment to critical thinking and free speech, to accelerate their rise into leadership across business, government, media, and beyond.  Efforts like these demand courage – from us and from them – an attribute in short supply today. But as C.S. Lewis noted, “Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.” Scott W. Atlas, M.D., is a senior fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution; co-director of the Global Liberty Institute; former advisor to the president and member, White House Coronavirus Task Force; and author of “A Plague Upon Our House: My Fight at the Trump White House to Stop COVID From Destroying America” (Bombardier Press). Mon, 09/22/2025 - 17:00
Watch Live: Charlie Kirk's Memorial Service, Over 100,000 Expected To Attend Watch Live: Charlie Kirk's Memorial Service, Over 100,000 Expected To Attend A massive public memorial for Charlie Kirk is underway at State Farm Stadium outside Phoenix, Arizona. Long lines began forming overnight, and attendees have been pouring into the stadium since early morning, with the crowds expected to be between 100,000 and 200,000.  WOW - This is the line at sunrise to get in to Charlie Kirk's funeral — End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) Worship at the State Farm Stadium has begun in honor of Charlie Kirk. Massive lines outside continue to slowly pour into the building. What an incredible scene! — TheBlaze (@theblaze) STUNNING TURNOUT: Drone video shows the outpouring of support as more than 100,000 people are expected to attend the Charlie Kirk memorial service in Arizona. — Fox News (@FoxNews) "Join us in celebrating the remarkable life and enduring legacy of Charlie Kirk, an American legend," Turning Point USA said in a post on X. image Key details about Kirk's public memorial:  Speakers: President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and Kirk's widow, Erika, who has just been named CEO of Turning Point USA. Security: The Department of Homeland Security has classified the event as a SEAR Level 1 gathering - the highest designation, typically reserved for events of national significance - unlocking full federal security support, according to NBC News. Turning Point USA said Kirk's memorial service is scheduled to begin at 11 a.m. local time. NBC News estimates the event could draw "a crowd as large as 100,000 people."  Meanwhile, a Glendale Police Department spokesperson told CNN News that she estimates crowds could exceed 200,000.  State Farm Stadium has a maximum capacity of 63,000, with the ability to expand by an additional 10,000. Down the street, Desert Diamond Arena will serve as an overflow site, with seating for about 20,000. Eleven days ago, Kirk was assassinated by a radical leftist while speaking at Utah Valley University. Tyler Robinson has been charged with aggravated murder and obstruction of justice in connection with Kirk's death. Robinson is a furry-loving leftist who was in a relationship with a transgender person. There have been no links yet between Robinson and far-left groups, but that hasn't stopped the White House from taking the rise of far-left militancy seriously. Last week, the Trump administration requested tens of millions of dollars for extra security and vowed to  (Marxists) that sow chaos and want to collapse the nation from within. Remember, Democrats labeled everyone they disagreed with as ."  Watch Live: . . . Sun, 09/21/2025 - 13:05
IRS, Treasury Release Details About 'No Tax On Tips' Deduction IRS, Treasury Release Details About 'No Tax On Tips' Deduction (emphasis ours), The U.S. Treasury Department and IRS on Sept. 19 released details about a provision backed by the Trump administration and Republicans, passed by Congress earlier this year, that would provide a tax break for many employees who receive cash tips. image In a document 📄.pdf in July. It stipulates that people earning a tipped income can deduct as much as $25,000 per year under the measure, instructing the IRS and Treasury Department to find what jobs could qualify. Nearly 70 jobs were eligible for the tax break under guidance that was released earlier this month, while the tax deduction will apply for the tax year 2025, up to Dec. 31 of this year, according to the proposed rules. “For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024, and before January 1, 2029, employees and self-employed individuals may deduct qualified tips from their gross income when calculating their Federal income tax liability,” the proposal stated, adding that qualified tips refer to cash tips that were received by a person in the covered occupations “on or before December 31, 2024, as provided by the Secretary.” On Sept. 3, the Treasury Department 📄.pdf a list of jobs that will likely be eligible under the new rules. The draft uploaded on Friday is open for comment through the Federal Register’s website. The IRS and Treasury will finalize the rules in early October, the document said, which includes the official proposed list of jobs eligible under the measure. The agencies did not specify a timeline. The proposal noted that the official list of jobs would be roughly the same as the Treasury list that was released on Sept. 3. Occupations include taxi drivers, rideshare drivers, valets, servers, bartenders, hosts and hostesses, chefs, cooks, dishwashers, bellhops, porters, concierges, housekeepers, hotel desk clerks, tour guides, golf caddies, movers, delivery drivers, barbers, digital content creators, casino employees, card dealers, musicians, ushers, locksmiths, repair workers, cleaners, singers, DJs, massage therapists, tattoo artists, bussers, hairstylists and others. “The Treasury Department and the IRS consulted data from surveys conducted in years 2017, 2019, and 2023” that had inquired about tips received in recent years, the recent proposal states. “The occupations identified as having customarily and regularly received tips based on this survey data were largely consistent with those identified by the confidential tax return data,” the agencies added. During the 2024 campaign, President Donald Trump and some Republicans campaigned, in part, on eliminating taxes on tips. Last year, Trump told supporters in Nevada that if he were elected, he would remove taxes on tips, while his opponent from the Democratic Party, Kamala Harris, later said she would support the measure. Under the current tax code, tips of $20 or more received by an employee in any month from one job are treated as wages subject to withholding. Cash tips include those received directly from customers, via credit and debit card charges that are distributed to an employee, or via a tip-sharing arrangement. Employees must keep a daily record of tips received and report these to their employer. Reuters contributed to this report. Sat, 09/20/2025 - 17:30
Data Centers And The Power Grid: A Path To Debt Relief? Data Centers And The Power Grid: A Path To Debt Relief? Could data centers and the power grid be America’s next “renaissance?” With the U.S. national debt exceeding $37 trillion and interest payments surpassing defense spending, many articles have been written about the “debt doomsday” event coming. Such was a point we made in  “In recent months, much debate has been about rising debt and increasing deficit levels in the U.S. For example, here is a recent headline from CNBC:” image “The article’s author suggests that U.S. federal deficits are ballooning, with spending surging due to the combined impact of tax cuts, expansive stimulus, and entitlement expenditures. Of course, with institutions like Yale, Wharton, and the CBO warning that this trend has pushed interest costs to new heights, now exceeding defense outlays, concerns about domestic solvency are rising. Even prominent figures in the media, from Larry Summers to Ray Dalio, argue that drastic action is urgently needed, otherwise another “financial crisis” is imminent.” As we discussed in that article, the “purveyors of doom” have been saying the same thing for the last two decades, yet the American growth engine continues chugging along. Notably, Ray Dalio and Larry Summers focus on only one solution: “cutting spending,” which has horrible economic consequences. “Furthermore, investors must understand a critical accounting concept: that the government’s debt is the household’s asset. In accounting, for every debit there is a credit that must always equal zero. In this case, when the Government issues debt (a debit), it is sent into the economy for infrastructure, defense, social welfare, etc. That money is “credited” to the bank accounts of households and corporations. Therefore, when the deficit increases, that money winds up in economic activity, and vice versa. In other words, those shouting for sharp deficit reductions are also rooting for a deep economic recession.” –  The other challenges with cutting spending are that it is politically toxic, and tax hikes drag on growth. However, one solution that all the mainstream “doomsayers” overlook is raising productivity and GDP through private-sector capital investment. In other words, as the U.S. did following World War II, it is possible to “grow your way out of your debt problem.” That’s where the AI data center boom and massive electricity demand come in. The Economic Engine of Capex The buildout of data centers and the power grid may offer the best opportunity to generate sustained growth. The scale of investment is large enough to matter, the economic multipliers are high, and the timeline aligns with when fiscal pressure will peak. Data centers are the backbone of the digital economy. AI models, cloud platforms, and automation rely on them, and each large AI model requires thousands of GPUs housed in purpose-built facilities. These are not minor server rooms. They are $1 billion-plus industrial complexes. But, for the build-out of “data factories” to impact economic growth, a massive investment will be required to affect a $30 trillion (nominal) U.S. economy. How much are we talking about? As noted in our previous article on data center demand, McKinsey projects that data center investment will reach $7 trillion globally by 2030. Over 40 percent of that will happen in the U.S. Alone. Moreover, Nvidia’s latest quarterly report forecasted data center capital expenditures by Apple, Meta, Microsoft, and Alphabet to reach $4 trillion by 2030, or roughly $1 trillion annually. image However, you can’t build a data center without power. Data Centers Require Power According to the Department of Energy, U.S. data center electricity consumption could double or triple by 2028. Deloitte expects a 30-fold increase in AI-related data center power usage by 2035, reaching 123 gigawatts. That’s more than the total residential demand in California. This means building new substations, transmission lines, and power plants. Therefore, as noted by 📄.pdf , investor-owned U.S. electric utilities will invest more than $1.1 trillion in the 2025-2029 period to meet that demand. This infrastructure boom will not be optional. AI development needs low latency, which requires local capacity and reliable electricity. Since data centers are capital-intensive and mission-critical, the U.S. economy could see between $1.25 and $1.5 trillion in annual capex spending. Why is that critical to our “debt to GDP” concerns? Large-scale capital spending is one of the few economic inputs reliably boosting long-term growth. Unlike stimulus checks or tax credits, infrastructure spending creates durable productivity improvements. We are already seeing this impact. The PwC study for the Data Center Coalition found that from 2017 to 2021, U.S. data centers added $2.1 trillion to GDP. That’s before the AI acceleration began. According to Reuters, in Q2 2025, AI-related capex accounted for over one-third of real GDP growth, which added roughly 0.4 percentage points to quarterly GDP. The Multiplier Effect But it isn’t just $1 trillion in CapEx. These projects create upstream demand for construction, power equipment, semiconductors, cooling systems, and skilled labor. They support engineering, real estate, logistics, and utility services. Most notably, they set the stage for sustained gains in productivity. Once operational, AI systems reduce costs, improve decision-making, and enable scale in industries from health care to manufacturing. In other words, there is a “multiplier effect” to these projects. The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) estimates that every $1 billion in infrastructure investment creates 13,000 jobs and adds $3 billion to GDP over a decade. Therefore, by 2030, if the $5 trillion in combined investment in AI data centers and power generation comes to fruition, the U.S. economy will see an additional $15 trillion in growth. The chart below shows the average 5-year growth rate in nominal GDP and projected growth. image The chart below assumes we will continue to issue debt at the average quarterly pace since 2021. However, instead of wasting money, we focus on productive investments while maintaining all current spending programs and obligations. Assuming some conservative growth estimates resulting from the investments, the “debt to GDP” ratio will begin declining in 2026 and revert to more sustainable levels by 2030. image However, this isn’t a guarantee, but it is certainly potentially more realistic than a “debt crisis” that sends the U.S. into an economic depression. Risks and Constraints The growth opportunity is significant, but not risk-free. While the bears constantly ring the alarm bell about the current level of debt and deficits, the more dire economic consequences they forecast may fail to come to fruition. As noted by Goldman Sachs: “Generative artificial intelligence has the potential to automate many work tasks and eventually boost global economic growth. AI will start having a measurable impact on US GDP in 2027 and begin affecting growth in other economies worldwide in the following years. The foundation of the forecast is the finding that AI could ultimately automate around 25% of labor tasks in advanced economies and 10-20% of work in emerging economies.” They currently estimate a growth boost to GDP from AI of 0.4 percentage points in the US. image Increases in productivity, productive capital investment, and increased labor demand for the infrastructure buildout (which will also result in higher wages) should provide the economic boost needed. Conclusion Will it solve all of the current socio-economic ills facing the U.S.? No. However, it may provide the growth boost necessary to revitalize economic growth and prosperity in the U.S., which we have not seen since the 1970s. But there are risks to this outlook. The scale of spending may lift electricity prices. A study from NC State found national prices could rise 8 percent by 2030, with some localities seeing 20–25 percent jumps. If not managed, this could erode industrial competitiveness. Jobs per dollar of investment are low. Data centers are automated. Once built, they require few workers. A $1 billion facility may employ only 100 people full-time. There is a local backlash. Projects require land, water, and energy. Communities are resisting tax incentives and environmental costs. Several counties have imposed moratoriums. Permitting delays and regulatory hurdles remain high. The average interconnection wait for new power projects is over 3 years. Without reform, many AI investments will be delayed or redirected. The government will need to be involved to unlock the full economic benefit. Public policy must streamline permitting, including environmental review, grid interconnection, and land use. Given that infrastructure and national security are at stake, a public/private partnership should be involved. Tax policy should avoid distortion. Many subsidies go to projects that were already economically viable. The focus should be on shared infrastructure, such as transmission lines, regional data hubs, and reliability upgrades. Utilities need regulatory clarity. Traditional cost-of-service models may not align with the fast pace of AI demand, so performance-based rates or return-on-equity mechanisms may be required. Energy policy must support generation diversity. Solar and wind are inefficient, and AI demands require firm natural gas, nuclear, and advanced storage capacity. The goal should be energy abundance. High reliability, low prices, and scalable infrastructure will attract private AI investment and increase growth. It may also just be enough to keep the demise of the U.S. from occurring any time soon. Sat, 09/20/2025 - 11:40
America's Turning Point America's Turning Point Conservative influencer Charlie Kirk’s assassination forces Americans to confront the dark side of progressive values. This confrontation is fundamentally reshaping society by exposing the hatred harbored behind plateaus of love and tolerance. image Decades of cultural messaging have focused on the harms caused by religious, conservative belief systems. Individuals and groups who fall on the margins of conservative ideology have been studied in universities, profiled in elite magazines, and their plights have been sympathetically portrayed in Hollywood. The word “bigotry” has long been associated with backward, conservative values. Manhattan Institute Fellow Colin Wright captured the left’s lurch towards extremism in a viral meme, updated after Kirk’s assassination: image Kirk’s assassination comes at an inflection point in American culture and politics. Donald Trump’s political career, and the corresponding progressive response, have revealed the degree to which leftist cultures can serve as incubators of hatred. Casual progressive dehumanization has spread into disturbing displays of gruesome violence. In just the past year, the public witnessed Trump’s attempted assassination, an anti-Trump transgender slaughter of Catholic school children, and a gruesome stabbing in Charlotte. While each individual is responsible for their individual actions, the media and other left-wing responses to violent incidents paint a clear and troubling picture. Violence on the left tends to be minimized, while rhetoric on the right is treated as synonymous with violence itself. That Kirk was assassinated on a college campus—a sanctuary of left-wing thought—is profound. Progressive students sought to silence Kirk by   the college to deplatform him on the grounds of hate speech just prior to his death. In light of the left’s unchecked, ideologically based dehumanization of their political opponents, words like “bigot” and “fascist” are simultaneously losing their stigma and morphing in meaning. People no longer assume the person labeled a bigot is morally corrupt. Instead, the individual hurling the insult is suspect. In true 1984 fashion, words have inverted meaning. The public implicitly knows the angry anti-fascist is more threatening than a conservative, church-going man with a microphone. Creating language for leftist intolerance The numerous assassination attempts against prominent right-wing figures over the past year did not arise in a vacuum. To understand the left, it is necessary to dissect its prejudice. This is the subject of my first nonfiction book.   blends autobiography and cultural commentary to give voice to challenges to progressive ideas by giving voice to the pain caused by progressive hatred. Books like these are vital. To combat the hatred of the left, it is essential to name the moral deficiencies of progressive ideology. This includes an honest and complete conversation of the people the left loves to condemn, marginalize, and kill. Understanding the dark side of the left is essential because all worldviews have victors and victims. The inability to confront the hatred of any ideology, particularly one dominant in culture and society, creates conditions ripe for polarization, mistrust, and violence. The left has monopolized righteous superiority by painting their opposition as extreme, morally reprehensible, and narrow-minded. Among the most effective tactics of their movement has been storytelling. By controlling the framing of narratives, the left guaranteed that people and groups they scorned were appropriately reviled. However, society is not static, and in the 20th century, secular progressivism transformed from a marginalized set of ideas to the establishment. From the Ivory Tower to DC, Hollywood, media, and law, progressive beliefs set the benchmark for moral goodness. Now that these ideas are facing serious challenges, the mask of hatred is falling, revealing the dehumanization and authoritarianism that those on the left love to deny. Turning towards the good Our culture is at a critical crossroads. Societies are composed of people, and the wheels of history move according to the emotional logic of humanity. No matter the governing ideology, there is a cap on the oppression people are willing to tolerate. The left’s iron grip on the moral imagination of the nation is slipping. And, as that grip loosens, progressives lash out in anger, determined to control the public they claim to liberate. To avoid sustained social ruin, America must return to goodness, order, beauty, and peace. But this reorientation cannot occur under the value system of radical progressives. The ideology itself is rooted in force, coercion, and the destruction of human dignity. Charlie Kirk contended with progressive prejudice, and it got him killed. Still, regardless of the risks, the danger, hatred, and prejudice of progressive culture must be boldly proclaimed. For the body may be killed, but truth overcomes the grave. Fri, 09/19/2025 - 21:45
Inside The CIA Unit Nobody Dares Talk About Inside The CIA Unit Nobody Dares Talk About In an eye-opening interview, former CIA officer turned whistleblower John Kiriakou pulled back the curtain on the agency's most elite fighting units, revealing how the United States’ intelligence agencies transformed overnight into a lethal force dedicated to hunting down radical Islamic terrorists after the September 11th terror attacks. Speaking with host Dalton Fischer, Kiriakou delivered a no-nonsense account of CIA's most classified operators, the legendary Ground Branch warriors, Special Activities Division (SAD), and Counterterrorism Center (CTC), elite units filled with the U.S.’s finest Navy SEALs, Army Rangers, and Delta Force operators. "These aren't your typical government bureaucrats," Kiriakou explained. "These are battle-tested heroes from our most elite military units, SEALs, Rangers, Delta Force, recruited because they have the skills and courage to do what others can't." After 9/11, these elite soldiers were quickly brought into the CIA fold, many on loan from the military before becoming permanent assets in divisions like Global Services, Special Activities Division, and the hard-hitting Counterterrorism Center. Their mission? Simple and vital: eliminate threats to American lives and freedom (and whatever the fuck else the CIA has them doing).  "What they do is so classified that even though everybody in the office knows what they're up to, nobody talks about it," Kiriakou revealed, describing the iron-clad secrecy surrounding these operations. Their job, the former CIA officer explained without hesitation, is "to neutralize anybody who poses a threat to the United States, its citizens, or its installations.” While praising the critical importance of eliminating high-value terrorist targets like Osama bin Laden to protect American families, Kiriakou didn't shy away from addressing the tough questions about oversight and accountability. "Mistakes happen in the fog of war," Kiriakou acknowledged, referencing troubling cases where intelligence errors led to innocent people being detained. "We're not lawless vigilantes. As American government officials, we're bound by the Constitution. That's what separates us from our enemies and makes America the beacon of freedom in the world.” Kiriakou pinpointed the exact moment America's intelligence community transformed into a fighting force. "The day after 9/11,” Kiriakou told Fischer, vividly recalling the pivotal moment when Cofer Black, then head of the Counterterrorism Center, stood before his team and declared the new reality. "Today, we're at war, and we're all going to have to fight. Not all of us are going to come home," Black announced to a silent room, marking the beginning of the U.S.’s years-long campaign against al-Qaeda. By Christmas 2001, Kiriakou explained that al-Qaeda’s core operations in Afghanistan was virtually destroyed, with only 25 active members remaining according to Senate intelligence. Before 9/11, the Special Activities Division operated in the shadows within the CIA's Directorate of Operations, conducting missions that were rarely discussed even within the agency itself. After the attacks, the Counterterrorism Center rapidly established its own special activities group, primarily composed of loaned military personnel focused on hunting down terrorists plotting against America. The elite CIA units regularly undertake extraordinarily dangerous missions, including parachuting into hostile territory, conducting high-risk extractions in terrorist strongholds like Benghazi, Khartoum, and Karachi. "It's extremely dangerous work,” Kiriakou said, noting that many fallen heroes are honored with anonymous stars on the CIA's Wall of Honor, their ultimate sacrifice known only to God and country. The post-9/11 atmosphere at the Counterterrorism Center reflected America's new war footing, with office areas nicknamed "Bin Laden Boulevard" and "Hezbollah Highway." Kiriakou also shed light on the Global Response Staff (GRS), elite security professionals whose job is literally to put their lives on the line for other Americans. Created to protect case officers operating in the world's most dangerous locations. "Your job is to throw your body in front of the other guy so he doesn't get killed,” he told Fischer. Kiriakou is a former CIA officer who became a prominent whistleblower after the agency's use of torture in interrogations following 9/11. He served in the CIA's Counterterrorism Center and was involved in the capture of high-value terrorist targets, including Abu Zubaydah in Pakistan in 2002. Kiriakou made headlines when he publicly confirmed the CIA's use of waterboarding and other enhanced interrogation techniques, becoming the first former CIA officer to openly discuss the agency's torture program. His revelations led to his prosecution under the Espionage Act, and he served nearly two years in federal prison for allegedly revealing the identity of a covert CIA officer. The 20-year war in Afghanistan stands as one of the U.S.'s most devastating foreign policy failures, costing taxpayers over $2 trillion and resulting in the deaths of 243,000 people across Afghanistan and Pakistan since 2001, according to in August 2021. The collapse exposed how two decades of military presence, billions spent training Afghan forces, and countless American lives lost failed to create the stable democracy our leaders promised, leaving many veterans asking whether their sacrifice was in vain. Fri, 09/19/2025 - 17:20
This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research What do people actually use ChatGPT for? It’s a question that has lingered since the tool first went viral back in 2022. Now, a 📄.pdf  sheds light on user behavior by analyzing a sample of 1.1 million messages from active ChatGPT users between May 2024 to July 2025. The findings, , show that ChatGPT’s core appeal is utility: helping users solve real-world problems, write better, and find information fast. image How People Use ChatGPT The table below summarizes the major use categories identified in the study: image Over 55% of ChatGPT prompts fell into either learning or productivity-related tasks. Users often turn to the chatbot for help understanding concepts, writing emails, summarizing articles, or coding. A wide base of users are using the tool as a digital assistant, tutor, or research aide. Meanwhile, niche categories like roleplaying and entertainment make up a smaller but meaningful slice. These uses include things like fictional storytelling, game design, and writing fan fiction. Their growth points to ChatGPT’s creative potential beyond functional tasks. Why This Study Matters This is the first large-scale analysis that classifies how ChatGPT is actually used, rather than relying on anecdotal evidence or surveys. It also reveals how people across professions—from marketers to software developers—are integrating AI into their daily workflows. Another key insight? Most people still use the free version of ChatGPT. Only about 10% of the prompts analyzed came from paid users of GPT-4, suggesting that even the free-tier model is driving  . Want to see how ChatGPT compares to other AI tools in terms of market share? Check out https://www.voronoiapp.com/technology/ChatGPT-Dominates-AI-Market-Share--6127  on the Voronoi app. Fri, 09/19/2025 - 04:15
Did NASA Scientists Discover Possible Evidence Of Ancient Life On Mars? Did NASA Scientists Discover Possible Evidence Of Ancient Life On Mars? Evidence collected by NASA's Perseverance Rover, launched to Mars in 2020, suggests the possible existence of ancient life on the Red Planet.  The discovery, if verified, would be the first confirmation of life beyond the planet Earth. After a year if review, scientists believe the leopard spots on rocks observed near a location called the Neretva Vallis river valley (which shows geological signs of large bodies of flowing water) are the potential remains of microscopic organisms.  The rover targeted a rock outcropping called the "Bright Angel" formation which proved to be a viable site. The rover’s science instruments found that the formation’s sedimentary rocks are composed of clay and silt, which, on Earth, are excellent preservers of past microbial life. They also are rich in organic carbon, sulfur, oxidized iron (rust), and phosphorous.  “The combination of chemical compounds we found in the Bright Angel formation could have been a rich source of energy for microbial metabolisms,” said Perseverance scientist Joel Hurowitz of Stony Brook University, “But just because we saw all these compelling chemical signatures in the data didn’t mean we had a potential biosignature. We needed to analyze what that data could mean.” NASA's team of scientists carefully reviewed the data over the course of a year.    “After a year of review, they have come back and they said, listen, we can’t find another explanation,” said Acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy. “So this very well could be the clearest sign of life that we’ve ever found on Mars, which is incredibly exciting.”  “The discovery of a potential biosignature, or a feature or signature that could be consistent with biological processes, but that requires further work and study to confirm a biological origin is something that we’re sharing with you all today that grows from years of hard work, dedication and collaboration between over 1,000 scientists and engineers here at the (NASA) Jet Propulsion Laboratory and our partner institutions around the country and internationally,” said Katie Stack Morgan, Perseverance project scientist at JPL, during a news conference Wednesday. The new announcement Wednesday is the result of a long, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09413-0 process and the collection of more data, said lead study author Joel Hurowitz, a planetary scientist at Stony Brook University in New York.  image Similar announcements of possible life on Mars have occurred since the very beginning of exploration.  In 1976 the Viking 1 and Viking 2 landers took soil samples which yielded positive readings of microbial activity, but the evidence was later deemed "ambiguous".   In 1996 a team of NASA scientists claimed to have found microscopic fossils of living organisms 4 billion years old in a Mars meteorite, but the data was labeled inconclusive due to suspicions of contamination. At one time, billions of years ago, Mars may have had very similar environmental and atmospheric conditions to the Earth, with all the necessary ingredients to feed living organisms.  The long running theory is that Mars lost it's magnetic field and solar winds destroyed it's atmosphere, though this claim remains unproven.  The events that led to Mars becoming a vast scorched red desert are still a mystery.    Thu, 09/18/2025 - 23:00
Rubio Says US Visa Revocations Underway After Charlie Kirk Death Celebrations Rubio Says US Visa Revocations Underway After Charlie Kirk Death Celebrations Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that foreign nationals who made celebratory comments over Charlie Kirk’s assassination will have their U.S. visas revoked, adding that the process is “underway.” “America will not host foreigners who celebrate the death of our fellow citizens,” Rubio wrote in a on X Monday. “Visa revocations are under way. If you are here on a visa and cheering on the public assassination of a political figure, prepare to be deported.” Kirk was shot and killed at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10 while he was speaking at a campus event. Prosecutors on Tuesday announced charges including capital aggravated murder, witness tampering, obstruction of justice, and more against Tyler Robinson, a 22-year-old Utah man who was arrested last week. image In an interview with Fox News on Monday, Rubio confirmed that the State Department will not grant visas to people who celebrated Kirk’s death and said that people who have U.S. visas will have their status revoked. “We are not in the business of inviting people to visit our country who are going to be involved in negative and destructive, okay,” Rubio told the outlet. “If I invite someone, if we invite someone to visit the United States of America, as a student, as a tourist, as whatever, then the standard they should be held to is very high.” Some social media users and influencers have made comments celebrating the Turning Point USA founder’s death, and some have been subsequently fired or suspended. Those include university employees, airline pilots, teachers, and doctors. An organization called the Charlie Kirk Data Foundation has that it has compiled more than 63,000 “data entries” in connection to an effort to compile those users. On Monday, Vice President JD Vance said that people who have made statements celebrating his assassination should be fired from their jobs. “Call their employer. We don’t believe in political violence, but we do believe in civility, and there is no civility in the celebration of political assassination,” Vance said as he hosted Kirk’s podcast. Last week, a State Department official that X users should inform the department about any visa holders making celebratory remarks online. “I have been disgusted to see some on social media praising, rationalizing, or making light of the event, and have directed our consular officials to undertake appropriate action,” Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau in a statement on X last week. Other Trump administration officials have signaled that the federal government may go after left-wing groups, NGOs, and their funding sources in the wake of Kirk’s death. Earlier this year, the State Department ordered U.S. Embassies to pause new student visa interviews, namely in relation to social media screening, an official The Epoch Times at the time. “We take very seriously the process of vetting who it is that comes into the country,” State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce told reporters in May. And in August, the Trump administration it would look into all 55 million visa holders in the United States. Wed, 09/17/2025 - 17:00