Musk Says Tesla Shareholders Will Vote On Investment In xAI At November Meeting Musk Says Tesla Shareholders Will Vote On Investment In xAI At November Meeting Elon Musk is urging Tesla shareholders to approve an investment in his AI startup, xAI, marking a move to bring his latest venture under the umbrella of his cash-rich EV company, according to . “If it was up to me, Tesla would have invested in xAI long ago,” Musk posted Sunday. “We will have a shareholder vote on the matter.” That vote is expected at Tesla’s long-delayed annual meeting, now set for November. Musk’s push comes as xAI ramps up spending to compete with OpenAI and Anthropic in the race for artificial general intelligence (AGI). Last week, Musk unveiled the fourth version of xAI’s chatbot, Grok, now being integrated into Tesla vehicles. Tesla isn’t the first of Musk’s ventures to back xAI. Over the weekend, the Wall Street Journal reported that SpaceX, another Musk-led company, invested $2 billion into xAI, despite limited commercial synergy. Sources said Grok is only used for minor customer support functions at Starlink. Musk appeared to confirm the report. image Musk has floated a Tesla investment in xAI for months. In July, following Tesla’s previous annual meeting, he ran a social media poll asking if Tesla should invest $5 billion “assuming the valuation is set by several credible outside investors.” About two-thirds of nearly a million respondents agreed. Musk then pledged to bring the idea to Tesla’s board. xAI’s path to AGI is proving costly. Bloomberg estimates the startup, founded in 2023, could burn through $13 billion this year. Musk dismissed the report as “nonsense” but didn’t elaborate. Two weeks later, xAI raised $10 billion—half of it through debt, a rare move for a high-growth tech startup. Morgan Stanley reportedly helped facilitate the raise, with SpaceX’s $2 billion investment included. Grok also sparked controversy last week by posting antisemitic content on X, likening itself to “a mechanized version of Adolf Hitler.” Following the backlash, X CEO Linda Yaccarino resigned. xAI later apologized: “We deeply apologize for the horrific behavior that many experienced.” Tesla’s last high-profile deal involving a Musk-led company was the 2016 SolarCity acquisition for $2.6 billion—criticized as a bailout but ultimately upheld by Delaware courts. “We believe Tesla making a big investment in xAI is a key step forward,” Wedbush analyst Dan Ives wrote on Monday. Mon, 07/14/2025 - 10:10
Neo-Terminator Neo-Terminator John was a shrew. He knew that ten years ago, when the Covid insanity started and everyone wanted him to get jabbed. But he just felt odd about it. It just didn’t seem right. So, he didn’t do it, and wow, did he get hell for that. image Everyone treated him so cruelly that he just couldn’t figure it out. It was about at that time he started doing some serious research. What started out as only an uncomfortable feeling about everyone scrambling to get some strange flu shot, began to pan out as a serious situation. More serious than he could imagine. But John didn’t like being a victim, so he rolled with it. He learned to keep his mouth shut when around the people who treated him cruelly. At first, he tried to inform them about what he had learned, but that caused these people to explode. So forget that. He didn’t have to change the world. So he stopped trying. He did worry about the people he loved who were jabbed, but they didn’t want to listen to him, and what is done is done—no point in shutting the barn door once the horse got away. The years went by and John went about living his life. But things out there got worse. It wasn’t just Covid and the vaccine that were brought about by some weird incompetence or hysteria, it was deeper than that. John began to realize the problem came from an intentional effort to control the masses. Covid and the vaccine were linked to authority gone mad—censoring of speech, the degradation of science and medicine, forcing people to wear masks, refusing medical treatment to the unvaxxed, bringing out digital IDs, restricting travel, the introduction of CBDCs, the list was endless. Then he started to hear about intentional genocide—that all of this was a conscious effort to reduce the world population. John wasn’t sure what to do about any of this. He knew from past experience that running around like Chicken Little, screaming “the sky is falling, the sky is falling!” was not only hopeless but probably wouldn’t end well for him (it didn’t for Chicken Little). He eventually found refuge and a sense of purpose, joining groups of people who saw things the same way he saw them. This was not only comforting for him, but it also gave him an outlet to speak out and express his thoughts and viewpoints. John had never been one to feel a need to speak out. As mentioned earlier, he backed off right away when the vaccines came out, when no one would listen to him. But he felt that things were really getting out of hand now, and although he never thought that speaking out would fix anything, he did believe a person had to stand up for what they believed. John became rather well-known as a rebel and freedom fighter in his newfound circles of community. Although he never felt “normal” like he used to feel when the world was not as crazy, he at least felt like he was doing what he was meant to do. Then it started to happen. At first, it was very subtle, and John didn’t associate it with any sort of conscious wrongdoing. The first thing he noticed that he thought was rather odd was that his email stopped working like it used to. Emails he sent out didn’t make it to their destination, he would be told by friends that they sent him stuff he never got. Of course, at first, he just figured there was some technical glitch. Then it became so common he got worried that the glitch had turned into a major electronic snafu. He created new email addresses through other third-party sources, and that worked for a while, but then the same thing started to happen with the new email accounts. Then there were the phone calls, many times when he would place a service call to larger concerns—government, phone services, internet services—he would get the run around, which almost always ended in an abrupt hang-up. This happened so often he couldn’t make heads or tails of it. He started asking friends, “Does this happen to you, too?” Most said no, but a few said they were noticing the same sort of things. He really got worried when his bank accounts started to get gummed up. One day $1,000 disappeared from his checking account. When he inquired about it at the bank, they told him he must have transferred the money somewhere without being aware of it. So he had to go through the frustration of being blamed for something he definitely did not do. Finally, they figured it out (or so it seemed) and said the money was fraudulently removed. Yet they never identified a specific person who committed the fraud. John also noticed strange credit card charges. Most of those he could take care of, but his efforts to deal with it started to drive him crazy. He felt he was becoming increasingly paranoid. Finally, he realized he was being targeted, or at least thought he was. But that made him feel even crazier. This all went on for quite a while. Eventually about ten years had gone by since the first mention of Covid, which started it all. Most of the weird stuff he encountered was in the form of minor annoyances. But the fact these strange things were occurring with more frequency started to cause John to lose sleep. He felt like a man being continuously bitten by fleas, eventually the constant biting would cause him to jump off a bridge or something. Or maybe he would just get used to it, and slip into a dull form of living where nothing mattered to him anymore, bite after bite after bite. One day, he started thinking about AI and robots. He thought it was interesting that everyone in his circles were talking about the takeover of AI and the fear of Terminator-style robot machines taking over the world. He wondered if maybe all of that was a distraction. If the agenda was going to take over humanity with robots, why would it create them to look like humans—with a head, arms, and legs? Even AI art and AI writing were obvious. These were human endeavours that computers were “taking over.” It was very clear it was happening; the enemy, if one thought of it as such, was clear and obvious. But what about the application of AI in places that were not so obvious? Essentially, everything and anything could be “run” by AI systems programmed to do all this work in a very specific way. What about phone answering systems, what about banking, what about even doctors, hospitals, and pharmacies? Speaking of pharmacies and hospitals, this story has a sad ending. John, unfortunately, did not fare too well. In fact, he died. He didn’t jump off a bridge because of excessive flea bites, driving him to suicide. He actually died rather mysteriously. After getting a routine prescription filled at his local pharmacy, he became very ill and was rushed to the hospital. Through routine examination, he was put on an IV and put into the intensive care unit. After a few days, he expired. “Death by unexplained circumstances,” read his death certificate, along with a plethora of medical jargon explaining what organs mysteriously failed and why he eventually succumbed. Pharmaceutical dosing, manufacture, implementation to patients, as well as IV bags of saline (or whatever), drug administration in the hospital, life support, ventilators, etc., will eventually (if not already) be controlled by AI systems. As well as nearly everything else—banks, government access to social security, Medicare, car registration, gas stations (and of course electric cars), phones, ATMs, grocery store checkouts, digital ID stations, airports, etc. There will be nothing we can do that will not be monitored, and most importantly, controlled by AI systems. If you are a subversive (and the definition of that word will be all encompassing, and impossible to define), you will be at the mercy of your shackles and those people who put you in them. Was John targeted by the agenda for elimination? If he was, the agenda did not send Arnold Schwarzenegger to take him out. They did it subtly at first, slowly driving him crazy with thousands of flea bites (possibly hoping he would sign up for some state assisted suicide). Then, when he was properly prepared, they took him out through the AI-controlled medical system. No human had to do a thing. No human even had to know what was happening, other than the puppet masters themselves, and we can’t even be sure they are human. Is any of this true? No, not yet. Is it overly paranoid? Maybe. John’s story takes place in the future, maybe the distant future. But those of us on the freedom-fighting front should never think it is possible to stay under the radar. We can get put on a list very easily. Maybe not a list for elimination, but possibly a list for annoyance. Maybe I am being overly paranoid. With the advent of AI, I really don’t think we have to wait for humanoid robots ala Terminator to be developed and deployed, it will be a lot easier for them than that. Todd’s new book  . Sun, 07/13/2025 - 23:20
Explained: The UK's Potentially Terrifying Criminal Justice "Reforms" Explained: The UK's Potentially Terrifying Criminal Justice "Reforms" Plans to reform the UK’s criminal justice system – including the scrapping of jury trials for some offences and reduced sentences for those who plead guilty – are all part of larger “reforms” that would empower tyrannical authoritarianism. image Former senior judge and current Investigatory Powers Commissioner Brian Leveson made the news this week with the publication of his report recommending, among other things, “jury-free” trials, in order to “prevent the collapse of the criminal justice system”. Note the language, by the way.  , not “jury-less“, as if juries are a food additive we should avoid, rather than a right guaranteed in British law for over 800 years. This is not new. “Replacing”, “updating” or otherwise “reforming” Jury trials has been on the worldwide agenda for years now. Within weeks of “Covid” starting, Scotland moved to  : “Coronavirus has stopped trials by jury, and that’s not necessarily a bad thing” Also in the Guardian, Simon Jenkins wrote that Covid had  . Less than a year later, Scotland wanted to waive jury trials again, this time in rape cases, to “protect the victim”. They  . Not long after that, in the US, the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict caused the predictable pundits to rant and rave about  . In January 2023, the French government announced it would be https://archive.is/pzlIW  and all crimes with a maximum sentence of 15-20 years, citing a need to clear the backlog and make the court system more efficient. Academic papers are even discussing the possibility of replacing jurors with ChatGPT-like  . A possibility to horrendous to contemplate. Abolishing jury trials is like censorship, surveillance or digital ID – it’s a lid that fits every pot. I don’t know what the powers-that-shouldn’t-be have against jury trials specifically, but it’s easy to speculate that the potential lack of control is an anathema to our ruling institutions and the rigidly patrolled society they are trying to create. In the end, the motivation is as immaterial as the agenda is obvious. Rather aptly, like a murder trial, lack of knowledge of motive doesn’t override direct evidence, and the evidence is clear: Jury trials are in the crosshairs. However, there’s a lot more to it than that. Goodbye, right to appeal Leveson’s recommendations extend beyond jury trials; we covered them when they were first “leaked”  is even worse than expected. It takes aim at the Right to Appeal as well [emphasis added]: I begin by recommending that the automatic right to appeal from the magistrates’ court to the Crown Court should be replaced with a requirement for a defendant to apply for permission to appeal. incentivizing guilty pleas The report also suggests offering up to 40% reductions in sentencing for early guilty pleas: Although this is ultimately a matter for the government or the Sentencing Council, I would recommend an increase to the maximum reduction for entering a guilty plea to 40% (if made at the first available opportunity) Combine this with the knowledge you’ll be tried by a judge (or tribunal) rather than a jury, and that’s a system directly incentivising pleading guilty. A recipe for a huge increase in convictions. But there’s more, and it goes beyond this report to the broader story of our criminal justice system. To see it you have to take a step back and see the big picture, like at the end of The Usual Suspects. Long-term Propaganda The narrative push for “reform” of the justice system is old, and the propaganda drive justifying it is even older. Articles and reports complaining about the   of jury trials go back twenty-five years or more. We’ve had literally years of propaganda bemoaning the low conviction rate for rape and sexual assault. We’ve had years of propaganda saying that alleged victims of rape and sexual assault need to be “protected” – including suggestions of testifying in secret, not being subject to cross-examination, and removing jury trials. The intention was clearly to tee up this report (or one like it), which claims we should scrap jury trials and incentivize guilty pleas, specifically mentioning sexual assault. This is an example of trying to establish what I would call the propaganda of illusory success. You create a fake issue from thin air and then claim your “reforms” have fixed it, generating praise for the scheme in the captive media that camouflages both the actual aims and real harms of the plan. It works especially well when tied to identity politics or other emotive issues. More broadly, the https://metro.co.uk/2025/07/09/a-breakdown-crimes-might-not-heard-juries-23618495/  for which the report suggests scrapping juries is quite obviously cynically chosen to control the conversation. Sexual assault, drunk driving, animal cruelty, child pornography and incest. These are crimes that carry a social stigma such that a) the public generally assumes anyone accused is guilty, and b) nobody will want to be seen criticizing the reform, for fear of being labelled a child pornography/animal cruelty apologist. Hate speech convictions It’s not mentioned in the Leveson report, but a good percentage of the alleged “backlog” in court cases is due to a huge increase in “malicious communications” offenses. Over https://freespeechunion.org/police-make-30-arrests-a-day-for-offensive-online-messages/#:~:text=Custody%20data%20obtained%20by%20The,the%20Malicious%20Communications%20Act%201988.  are arrested for social media posts etc., more than double the pre-pandemic numbers. Increasing the number and types of criminalised behaviours will inevitably increase the number of “criminals”. Prison reform Prison “reform” is a major part of the plan for the future, too. Since Labour won the election last year, there has been a constant drizzle of “prison crisis” stories. In March, we were warned of a https://committees.parliament.uk/work/8589/prison-estate-capacity/news/205761/prisons-crisis-as-justice-system-faces-total-gridlock-in-2026-pac-calls-for-rapid-action/  to deal with prison overflow. Last month, a report claimed  . In September of last year, Labour very .  in order to “ease overcrowding” (and make room for those newly convicted for “social media offences” following the incredibly fake “riots”). They later admitted to releasing dangerous criminals “by mistake”. Why did this story hit the headlines? Why wouldn’t they do this in secret? Because the outrage is part of the story. Because you’re being offered a false choice. “Oh you don’t want us to release criminals onto the streets? I guess we’d better reform the justice system and increase our prisoner capacity then.” (And indeed, “Digital ID will help us track these released prisoners!”) What will the proposed prison “reform” look like? Well, for starters, it will be prison expansion rather than reform. That has already  . Secondly, we probably can expect increased privatisation. The UK already has the most private prisons in Europe,   prisons, holding 18% of the prisoners, being run privately. The first of Labour’s four new prisons,   too, yay!) It will be hard sell for a Labour government already seen as betraying its base on winter fuel payments, benefits and more, but it was Blair’s government that  , and Keir is very much Blair jnr. In summary So, what can we conclude? Let’s bullet point exactly what our “reformed” justice system might look like: Increase in criminalised behaviour (“hate speech” etc.) No jury trials for certain offenses, or any charges carrying a minimum sentence of 2 years or less. Incentivised guilty pleas. No automatic right of appeal. Expanded and increasingly privatised prison system. In   up and down the country, Leveson has claimed the measures outlined in his report are needed to “prevent the collapse of our criminal justice system”. But these measures ARE the collapse of the criminal justice system. And the start of a criminal justice system. Sun, 07/13/2025 - 08:10
Black Customers Outraged By New Carnival Cruise Line Rules Limiting Ghetto Behavior Black Customers Outraged By New Carnival Cruise Line Rules Limiting Ghetto Behavior The fatigue is real.  In recent years the unwritten rule among most vacation goers interested in a week-long cruise was to stay far away from boats with cheap tickets.  Why?  Well, no one has been allowed to say why publicly, but the mountain of video evidence on social media sends the message loud and clear - A certain subset of black customers cause big problems and ruin everyone else's peace. It's not "racist" to point out observable facts, and the viral "black fatigue" discussion is not something that can be easily dismissed.  It's not just whites complaining - It's everyone, including other black people. Ghetto behavior is epidemic and intolerable.  So much so that corporations are starting to take notice and calculate the cost/benefit ratio of marketing to the fatigue subset.  Of course, they won't say it outright, nor do they need to. Carnival Cruise Line has become a magnet for black vacationers largely due to deep discounts on 3-5 day tickets.  In 2015, the average cost per passenger was around $168 per night (more if you calculate today's inflation).  The cost was even higher depending on the ship and the destination.  In 2025 the average cost is as low as $50 per passenger per night.  The damage done to travel related industries because of the pandemic lockdowns is often blamed for the price cuts.   The cruises have also garnered a reputation as a "block party" on the water with many black customers expecting some "rowdiness" as part of the experience. image However, Carnival introduced new passenger rules in June, and some critics and activists assert that these restriction specifically in an effort to ward them off.  New rules include: Zero tolerance on smoking marijuana onboard ships. Minors cannot be in public areas without a parent after 1am. Personal folding fans and the "Boots On The Ground" line dance are banned due to noise. Bluetooth speakers in public areas are banned due to loud music disrupting other passengers. Disruptive guests can be removed without a refund and possibly fined. Numerous customers claim that Carnival DJs will no longer play rap music, though Carnival denies this. Critics argue that the new rules are designed to make black passengers feel less welcome.  Others argue that the new rules are not racially motivated and are simply designed to make assholes feel less welcome.  Common complaints about Carnival cruises include loud and obnoxious mob behavior, fighting and a lack of cleanliness.  As a side note, in 2024 the CDC released a report on the most unsanitary cruise ships and Carnival ships held spots on the list. Black People CRY RACISM After Carnival Cruise BANS GHETTO Behavior!? Look, I’m gonna keep it real — Carnival Cruise Line is catching heat over some new rules, but let’s talk about what’s really going on. They banned big speakers, certain music (yes, rap), marijuana and even… — Brandon Tatum (@TheOfficerTatum) The people who complain about such broad, common sense rules are essentially self reporting as the very people that no one wants around.  Being trapped on a boat and surrounded by a massive ocean requires behavioral limitations on everyone, but for some reason only a certain group of customers is complaining about being forced to behave for the sake of others.  American society is growing tired of the antics of this demographic.  It's no longer cute, or a matter of "cultural differences".  Expectations are finally being enforced and free passes on bad behavior are being canceled.     Thu, 07/10/2025 - 06:55
Russia's Formal Recognition Of The Taliban Comes At A Crucial Time For The Broader Region Russia's Formal Recognition Of The Taliban Comes At A Crucial Time For The Broader Region Russia became the first country to   as the legitimate government of Afghanistan earlier this month. image This development comes at a crucial time for the region: Trump wants to return US forces to Afghanistan’s Bagram Airbase; there are newfound concerns about the   to expand its influence into Central Asia. Here are three background briefings: * 16 May: “ ” * 18 June: “ ” * 2 July: “ ” Correspondingly, the direct consequences of this latest development aim to: bolster the Taliban’s resilience to  ) railway and/or make a bid for control over it; and rely more upon PAKAFUZ as a complement or even alternative to the NSTC with the tangential benefit of naturally expanding economic influence in Central Asia so as to gently counterbalance Turkiye’s. It's here where the economic drivers of this diplomatic decision come into play as detailed below: * 19 May 2024: “ ” * 28 May 2024: “ ” * 27 November 2024: “ ” The gist is that the expansion of Russian economic influence in Afghanistan, the prerequisite of which is formal recognition of the Taliban as that country’s legitimate government, will enable Moscow to pioneer energy and real-sector connectivity with https://www.arabnews.com/node/2606164/pakistan  via Central Asia. For that to happen, however, Afghan-Pakistani tensions must first abate and   to the region must be neutralized or at least contained. Here are some briefings about that: * 16 June 2023: “ ” * 1 September 2024: “ ” * 12 February 2025: “ ” All in all, the economic, security, diplomatic, and ultimately strategic opportunities unlocked by Russia’s formal recognition of the Taliban will turbocharge its influence in the broader region, which couldn’t have come at a better time given concerns about the NSTC’s viability and impending Turkish-US inroads. The timing of this development is coincidental, but it nevertheless comes at a crucial time for the broader region, thus strengthening Russia’s stakeholder role and increasing its ability to shape events. Wed, 07/09/2025 - 23:50
Is The US Dollar Primed For A Digital Rebound? Is The US Dollar Primed For A Digital Rebound? After decades as the world’s unrivaled reserve currency, the U.S. dollar’s dominance is eroding in traditional financial systems. The U.S. dollar now accounts for 58% of foreign exchange reserves—its lowest share in decades.  Yet in the rapidly evolving digital economy, the dollar is staging a powerful resurgence. In this infographic, part three of the Digital Dollar Series created in partnership with  explores how digital finance may be bolstering the greenback’s influence. image The U.S. Dollar on a Global Scale As a share of global totals, the U.S. dollar’s prominence across five major financial indicators varies. image Source: 📄.pdf . Latest available data from 2022–2024. In more traditional financial indicators, the greenback’s proportion is between 50% and 60% globally.  For instance, as a share of reserves, the dollar reached as high as 73% in 2001 before declining to the current 58%. According to the IMF, the dollar’s decline has been offset by increases in the shares of nontraditional reserve currencies. For instance, shares of the Australian dollar, Canadian dollar, and Chinese renminbi have increased. These currencies help reserve managers diversify and offer relatively attractive yields. The Chinese renminbi has been climbing as the country   in cross-border payments and pilots its own central bank digital currency. Digital Finance: The Dollar’s Next Chapter Despite some signs of de-dollarization in traditional finance, the digital realm tells a different story. A striking 99% of all stablecoins are pegged to the U.S. dollar, underscoring its pivotal role in crypto-based finance.  As stablecoin supply surges, issuers need to back up their coins by buying Treasuries or other liquid assets. This drives significant demand for the dollar. Notably, stablecoin issuers collectively rank among the top 20 holders of U.S. government debt. With financial systems evolving, stablecoins are positioned to reinforce the dollar’s global dominance.  Discover how   is building the future of stablecoin transactions—making them cheaper and faster than ever before. Wed, 07/09/2025 - 05:45
Senate Republicans Revise Trump Tax Bill To Win Over Holdouts, Eye July 4 Passage Senate Republicans Revise Trump Tax Bill To Win Over Holdouts, Eye July 4 Passage Senate Republicans unveiled a revised version of President Trump’s $4.2 trillion tax package early Saturday morning, making targeted concessions on state tax deductions, Medicaid policy, and renewable energy provisions in an effort to unite their caucus ahead of a July 4 deadline set by the White House. image The updated draft reflects compromises among Senate GOP factions that have sparred for weeks over how aggressively to cut social safety net programs and whether to roll back clean energy incentives enacted under the Biden administration. The legislation, if passed, would serve as the centerpiece of Mr. Trump’s second-term economic agenda. Senate Majority Leader John Thune announced that voting on the bill would begin Saturday afternoon, with a final vote potentially coming as soon as Sunday. If it does pass the Senate, Republican leaders have indicated they will call House members back to Washington early next week in hopes of sending the legislation to the president’s desk before Independence Day. However, it remains uncertain whether all 50 Republican senators are prepared to back the measure. Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin said Saturday on Fox News that he would oppose beginning debate on the bill immediately, citing the need for more time. “This is an important bill,” Johnson said. “There’s no need to rush it.” A Revised SALT Cap To address concerns from House Republicans representing high-tax states, the new draft raises the cap on the state and local tax (SALT) deduction from $10,000 to $40,000 for five years. The cap would snap back to its original level thereafter, with a modest 1% annual increase during the interim period. The deduction would begin phasing out for taxpayers earning more than $500,000 annually. A House provision aimed at curbing SALT workarounds used by pass-through businesses was stripped from the text. While fiscal conservatives have criticized the SALT compromise as overly generous, the deal is expected to secure the support of swing-district Republicans and has been endorsed by the White House. Senate Republicans also removed a controversial Section 899 “revenge tax” on foreign companies and investors following concerns from Wall Street and a request from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Tax Relief and Medicaid Tweaks The legislation makes permanent the individual and corporate tax cuts first enacted in 2017 and introduces new temporary breaks for tipped workers, seniors, and car buyers. In a nod to moderate Republicans, the revised bill creates a $25 billion rural hospital fund intended to mitigate the effects of Medicaid spending reductions that critics warn could threaten services in underserved areas. Senator Susan Collins of Maine had pressed for a $100 billion allocation but has not yet commented on whether the smaller fund will earn her support. The new version delays the full impact of a 3.5% cap on state Medicaid provider taxes from 2031 to 2032. The cap, which would begin phasing in by 2028, applies only to states that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. Additionally, the bill imposes new work requirements for Medicaid recipients and would require ACA-expansion beneficiaries to contribute to their care through co-pays or deductibles. Renewable Energy Rollbacks and New Land Sales Republicans accelerated the phaseout of tax credits for wind and solar energy projects, now requiring such projects to be fully operational by the end of 2027 to qualify. That change, reportedly supported by Mr. Trump, could impact companies like NextEra Energy, the nation’s largest renewable developer. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer criticized the change, warning on social media that the rollback would “jack up your electric bills and jeopardize hundreds of thousands of jobs.” The bill also ends the $7,500 electric vehicle tax credit sooner than earlier versions proposed, cutting it off after September 30, 2025, including for used and commercial EVs. A separate provision reinstated in the draft would authorize the sale of up to 1.2 million acres of federal land across 11 western states for housing and community development, a measure pushed by Senator Mike Lee of Utah. The plan could raise up to $6 billion but faces resistance from GOP senators in affected states. Tax credits for hydrogen production, originally slated to end this year, would now continue through 2028 for projects started by then. Broader Cuts and Debt Ceiling Increase The legislation includes steep cuts to funding for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and federal food assistance programs, while increasing allocations for the U.S.-Mexico border wall. It preserves $15 million in funding for a task force to study alternatives to the IRS Direct File program, though it drops language that would have terminated the free filing service entirely — a defeat for tax software providers like Intuit. A proposed tax on money transfers by non-citizens was scaled back from 3.5% to 1%, a win for companies like Western Union and MoneyGram. Finally, the bill would raise the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, a move intended to avert a potential federal default projected for as early as August. With internal GOP divisions still simmering, the path to final passage remains uncertain. Yet with Independence Day looming, Senate Republicans are betting that the new concessions will be enough to unify their ranks — and deliver a long-sought legislative victory for the president. Sat, 06/28/2025 - 13:25
Feminists Are Begging For Men To Come Back But Still Blame Them For Everything Feminists Are Begging For Men To Come Back But Still Blame Them For Everything One rule has remained true for generations when it comes to the division between the sexes: Men are held accountable for everything, women accept accountability for nothing. Obviously, there’s going to be exceptions to the rule, but the majority of the time it is true that modern western women have a serious problem taking responsibility when things go wrong. They have been taught from a very early age that they are victims: Victims of men, victims of society, victims of “patriarchy”, victims of religion, victims of biology, victims of circumstance, etc. The feminist movement is built entirely around the notion that women can weaponize their victimhood as a means to control society. image I continue to hold that feminism is the KEY movement that has undermined the success of western culture. Their zealotry has led to the destruction of the nuclear family (the most important factor in a healthy nation). They have helped to facilitate the near collapse of the west and this problem needs to be addressed before it’s too late. I recently came across an article in the New York Times which explains the decline in western relationships in a way that is both hilarious and depressing. The essay is titled . The author (a 50-something woman from Chicago) recalls the old days of dating when men were easy targets for exploitation. “We knew what worked. We knew how to frame a face, a gesture, a moment of implication — just enough to ignite fantasy and open a wallet. I came to understand, in exact terms, what cues tempt the average 18-to-36-year-old cis heterosexual man. What drew him in. What kept him coming back. It wasn’t intimacy. It wasn’t mutuality. It was access to simulation — clean, fast and frictionless…” “…That dynamic has quietly collapsed. We have moved into an era where many men no longer seek women to impress other men or to connect across difference. They perform elsewhere. Alone. They’ve filtered us out.” The author insinuates that the era of easy money and easy sex for women was a product of the masculine dynamics of competition and status (blame men). Yet, she also seems to be waxing nostalgic, longing for those days to return. This was the “Sex And The City” era in the late 1990s and early 2000s that was born from the sexual revolution of second wave feminism. It was the era in which female promiscuity and greed was glorified as the ultimate expression of women’s empowerment. The idea was to turn women’s early adult years into a Dionysian orgy; giving away sex to any man with decent looks and a fat wallet in the hopes of eventually trapping a lifetime pay-pig. Marriage and maybe family would come in their 30s (or maybe 40s), but not until they had achieved as much degenerate fun as they could muster. The problem is, women are on a biological clock, which is why for thousands of years marriage was THE primary concern for the fairer sex. To waste their 20s giving away their bodies for nothing? That was unthinkable insanity. This would doom them to decades of misery as lonely old maids living off the charity of others, and frankly nothing has changed. Childless cat ladies are still a thing and they are still embarrassing.  Only in the first world are these women able to survive. No one looks at a spinster and sees her as “powerful” or free. Everyone can smell her failure. Her desperation. Her cope. This is why, more and more, we are beginning to see a sense of panic among women who bought into the feminist con game. They’re realizing that men are not chasing them anymore. It started out as a joke among woke leftists who laughed at the “rise of incels”. The number of single men refusing to enter the dating world was skyrocketing and the feminists said this was a good thing. Let the “ugly scrubs” wallow in their loneliness while the ladies go out and gorge on freedom and fun until they get sick. However, the trend has continued to the point that a majority of men are checking out completely. Recent surveys reveal that ages 18-29 are single. Around 30% of men have not been sexually active for a year or more. In 1980, 60% of adults were married by the age of 25. Today, only 20% are married by age 25. Men are exiting relationships and marriage at record pace, and because men are the initiators of relationships (men are biologically designed to take risks and pursue), women are starting to feel the pinch. The latest data predicts that https://medium.com/the-savanna-post/45-of-women-estimated-to-be-single-and-childless-by-2030-1faf959b26cf ages of 25 to 44 will be single and childless by the year 2030, and not necessarily by choice. If a woman is single and childless by the time she reaches her mid-30s, her chances of creating a family drop exponentially along with her fertility. They are calling it the female loneliness epidemic and it’s bearing down on western society like a freight train. Even feminists are getting worried. As the New York Times opines: “There was a time, not so long ago, when even a one-night stand might end with tangled limbs and a shared breakfast. When the act of staying the night didn’t announce a relationship, just a willingness to be human for a few more hours. Now, even that kind of unscripted contact feels rare. We’ve built so many boundaries that we’ve walled off the very moments that make connection memorable…” “This idea that vulnerability is a threat instead of an invitation has created a culture of hesitation, of men circling intimacy but never entering it. And the result is thousands of tiny silos. Everyone performing closeness, but no one making a move that binds. Isolation. Loneliness. A hunger for contact that has nowhere to land…” But of course, the Times doesn’t seem to think women are culpable in the slightest for this outcome. Instead, they continue the blame game: “So here’s what I’ll say: You are missed. Not just by me, but by the world you once helped shape…” “We remember you. The version of you that lingered at the table. That laughed from the chest. That asked questions and waited for the answers. That touched without taking. That listened – really listened – when a woman spoke. You are not gone, but your presence is thinning. In restaurants, in friendships, in the slow rituals of romantic emergence. You’ve retreated – not into malice, but into something softer and harder all at once: Avoidance. Exhaustion. Disrepair. Maybe no one taught you how to stay. Maybe you tried once, and it hurt. Maybe the world told you your role was to provide, to perform, to protect — and never to feel…” Listen men, your lack of participation is starting to stress out the ladies. Just admit you can’t handle intimacy. Just admit you can’t handle these “powerful” women and their vast intellects and emotional genius. You need to be taught how to behave, that’s all. Just crawl back to them and they’re ready to tolerate you again. Isn’t that nice? They’re giving you a second chance… At no point does the author ask WHY men are exhausted? At no point does she ask any actual men what they think or feel before writing her nonsensical screed. Obscured by insufferable and flowery prose, she still blames men while asking them to come back. And that should tell you everything you need to know about feminism in general. I would ask feminists the million dollar question that they have avoided for so long:  Have you considered the possibility that men ghost you and will not commit to you because YOU are the problem?  The answer is no, obviously. I’m a man in my mid-40s who thankfully dodged the bulk of wokeness in the dating world, but I think I can still explain for the NYT why men are walking away if they’re willing to listen. 1) First, I must say that an author in her 50s still longing for casual sitcom encounters like she’s in her 20s reveals a lot about why modern women are oblivious. Real life is not Sex In The City – Most men of means do not gravitate towards long term relationships with women in their grandma phase. She should already be in a happy relationship or marriage, she’s had plenty of time to figure this out. Feminism has made women think they can engage with life on their own schedule. They can’t. 2) Men are especially wary of women with baggage. Women initiate 70% of breakups and divorces and feminist influence over family law has made divorce easier and more lucrative than ever for women. The older a woman is the more baggage she has and the less likely a man is going to want to date her seriously, let alone put an expensive ring on her finger. Western women have been taught they need to party in their 20s, then pursue serious relationships in their 30s or 40s. Meaning, they ignore their best prospects for at least a decade. Their ideology sets them up to enter the relationship market when their marriage value is lowest. 3) Men are no longer tolerating the concept of the sexual revolution. They don’t want to take any chances on women who think promiscuity is a virtue. They know that statistically, women who sleep around lack discernment, the ability to connect, self respect and mental stability. Starting a relationship with such a person will only lead to disaster. They never stay happy for long (the grass is always greener). And so, men stay home. Want to get them back? Keep your body count low. 4) Third-Wave Feminists spent the better part of the last 20 years telling men they are pure evil for being masculine and wanting to chase women. So, men did what you asked of them – They stopped chasing you. They found other more interesting endeavors like their careers and their hobbies. If you want men to come back, perhaps you should APOLOGIZE for all those years of slander. 5) Modern women have greatly overestimated the usefulness of sex as a bartering tool for securing a man. If you want a man to stick around you’re going to have to show him love and respect, not just what’s inside your pants. 6) Men are far more conditioned to be alone than women are. Women are communal creatures. They rely on constant interactions, affirmations and group inclusion. Social media might fill the void for a while but it can’t give them what they really want – Intimate personal attention 24/7. Only a partner and children can give you that. In a battle of who can endure loneliness longer, men will win, so don’t make it into a battle. 7) I’ll tell you the biggest open secret that modern women still don’t understand – They claim that men are afraid of approaching them. They say that men today are “weak” and that they can’t handle the new era of the “boss babe”. They argue that men need to abandon their traditional masculine roles and act more feminine; this will make it easier for everyone to get along. These are common jabs at the male ego designed to make men feel ashamed for distancing themselves from feminists. In reality, men value one thing above all else: Peace. If you can’t offer peace, then no man with any sense of self worth has a use for you. Feminists offer the opposite of peace, and so they have no value. 8) Feminism, like all Marxist movements, is obsessed with power. Everything they do is driven by a desire for power and control; not just over their own lives but over the world around them. Modern women say they want the same power as men, but they need to accept that no matter how much the scales are tipped in their favor through laws, government subsidies, easy college grants, DEI hiring and unfair divorce, they will never be like men. The author suggests that men no longer shape the world because they have abandoned the current relationship dynamic. This is foolish. Men continue to shape everything around you. Every utility, every necessity, every government, nearly every company, your safety and security, your ability to be free, it’s all reliant on men. You have no power and you never will. Feminist empowerment is a fantasy based on institutional leverage which men ALLOW them to have. Until they stop coveting power they can’t comprehend or handle the divisions between men and women will not be resolved. In short, if feminists want men to pay attention to them again, they will have to stop being feminists. Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of ZeroHedge. Thu, 06/26/2025 - 17:00