Treasury Sanctions 3 Mexican Financial Institutions For Aiding Cartels In Fentanyl Trade; Sheinbaum Denies Treasury Sanctions 3 Mexican Financial Institutions For Aiding Cartels In Fentanyl Trade; Sheinbaum Denies Update (1100ET): Mexican President Sheinbaum has commented on the sanctions, denying any fraud and claiming the Mexican banking system is 'sound': *SHEINBAUM: NO EVIDENCE OF MONEY LAUNDERING IN MEXICAN BANKS *SHEINBAUM SAYS MEXICO ONLY FOUND ADMINISTRATIVE FLAWS IN BANKS *SHEINBAUM: MEXICO ASKED US TREASURY MONEY LAUNDERING EVIDENCE *SHEINBAUM: MEXICAN FINANCIAL SYSTEM SOUND, ACCUSED FIRMS SMALL *MEXICO TRANSFERS TO CHINA COS 'NOT MONEY LAUNDERING': SHEINBAUM Just a coincidence? *  *  * . The institutions are CIBanco S.A., Intercam Banco S.A., and Vector Casa de Bolsa S.A. de C.V. image CIBanco and Intercam are commercial banks with assets worth more than $7 billion and $4 billion, respectively. Vector is a brokerage company managing almost $11 billion in assets. FinCEN has determined that the entities launder money in connection with illicit opioid trafficking, and have “collectively played a longstanding and vital role in laundering millions of dollars on behalf of Mexico-based cartels and facilitating payments for the procurement of precursor chemicals needed to produce fentanyl,” the statement said. CIBanco facilitated illicit opioid trafficking by Mexican cartels such as Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG), Beltran-Leyva Cartel, and Gulf Cartel. Intercam was linked to CJNG, and Vector with the Sinaloa Cartel and Gulf Cartel, said the statement. FinCEN said that between 2021 and 2024, CIBanco processed more than $2.1 million in payments from Mexico-based companies to entities in China that shipped precursor chemicals to Mexico. Intercam processed over $1.5 million during the same period. As for Vector, the institution processed more than $1 million between 2018 and 2023. The sanctions prohibit financial institutions in the United States from engaging in the transmission of funds from or to CIBanco, Intercam, or Vector. The prohibition also applies to any account or convertible virtual currency address administered by the three institutions. In a June 25 , CIBanco said it does not maintain illegal business relationships. The bank “reiterates its compliance with all guidelines established by the competent authorities,” it said. “CIBanco maintains constant communication with the relevant Mexican and U.S. authorities and reaffirms its full willingness to cooperate,” it said. Intercam https://x.com/IntercamBanco/status/1938007154583019561 they “categorically deny” any links between the institution and illicit activity, specifically money laundering, according to a June 25 statement. The institution reiterated its “firm commitment to transparency and legality.” In a June 25 https://x.com/VectorCB/status/1937979846526730650 , Vector said it “categorically rejects any accusation that compromises its institutional integrity.” The institution has operated under strict rules, auditing, and supervision of national financial authorities, it said. Illicit Transactions In a June 25 , Mexico’s Ministry of Finance and Public Credit said it had asked the U.S. Treasury for evidence of CIBanco, Intercam, and Vector having links to illicit activities that could be corroborated by Mexico’s Financial Intelligence Unit (UIF) or the National Banking and Securities Commission. “However, no substantiating information was received,” it said. “The only information provided by the Treasury Department that Mexico can verify contains data on some wire transfers made through the aforementioned financial institutions to legally incorporated Chinese companies. However, thousands of these transactions are made through Mexican financial institutions.” “The UIF found transactions made to these Chinese companies by more than 300 Mexican companies through 10 Mexican financial institutions. This is because Mexico has thousands of regular transactions with legally incorporated Chinese companies, with annual trade totaling $139 billion,” according to the statement. The ministry clarified that if it receives “conclusive information” proving that CIBanco, Intercam, and Vector engaged in illicit activities, it will “act to the fullest extent of the law.” However, the ministry has not received any such information to date, it added. According to the June 25 Treasury statement, the sanction orders against the Mexican financial institutions were made pursuant to the https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sb0179#:~:text=These%20orders%20are%20the%20first,synthetic%20opioids%2C%20including%20by%20cartels. Sanctions Act and the FEND Off Fentanyl Act. The two Acts provide the Treasury with additional powers to target money laundering linked with the trafficking of fentanyl and other synthetic opioids. These are the first actions taken by FinCEN under the two Acts, according to the Treasury. Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent said that “financial facilitators like CIBanco, Intercam, and Vector are enabling the poisoning of countless Americans by moving money on behalf of cartels, making them vital cogs in the fentanyl supply chain.” “Today’s actions affirm Treasury’s commitment to using all tools at our disposal to counter the threat posed by criminal and terrorist organizations trafficking fentanyl and other narcotics,” he said. In a June 26 on social media platform X, Bessent said both the United States and Mexico are committed to ensuring that financial systems have “strong anti-money laundering/countering the financing of terrorism controls.” China’s Long Game In an with podcaster Joe Rogan on June 6, FBI Director Kash Patel said that China’s plan was to weaken the United States over the long term using the fentanyl crisis. The Chinese Communist Party did not make much money off the drug trade by supplying precursor chemicals. The plan is to “take out generations of young men and women” who could have taken on jobs such as a police officer, a soldier, or a teacher, he said. “That’s what they [China] are doing, when you wipe out tens of thousands of Americans a year. It’s a long-term plan for them,” he said. According to https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/nchs_press_releases/2025/20250514.htm from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there were an estimated 48,422 deaths in the country involving synthetic opioid fentanyl in 2024. The Chinese communist regime’s ongoing supply of illegal drugs to the United States was one of the reasons stated by the Trump administration for imposing 20 percent additional on Chinese imports earlier this year. Following a recent trade agreement, China has announced new controls for two fentanyl precursors. Thu, 06/26/2025 - 12:20
Ayatollah Claims 'Victory' Over Israel Which 'Almost Collapsed' In 1st Public Appearance Since Ceasefire Ayatollah Claims 'Victory' Over Israel Which 'Almost Collapsed' In 1st Public Appearance Since Ceasefire Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Thursday issued his first comments since the Trump-backed ceasefire with Israel took effect, congratulating "the great nation of Iran" for its "victory over the fake Zionist regime." "Despite all that noise, and with all those claims, the Zionist regime almost collapsed and was crushed under the blows of the Islamic Republic," he said, according to the national IRNA news agency. He also claimed to have "delivered a slap to America’s face." image At a moment the Trump administration is celebrating to 'obliteration' of the Islamic Republic's core elements and main facilities of its nuclear program, the Ayatollah downplayed the effects of the military campaign. He described that the United States entered the war along Israel's side "because they felt that if they did not enter, the Zionist regime would be destroyed." He presented this as a sign of Israeli weakness, echoing prior statements issued during the aerial raids. "However, the Americans did not gain anything in this war," he asserted. He went to say that those that attacked Iran suffered a high cost. According to more from state media : “We thank God for aiding our armed forces, who managed to breach their advanced multilayered defense systems and flatten large parts of their military and urban centers with powerful missile and weapons strikes,” he said. Ayatollah Khamenei said it proves to the Zionist regime that aggression against the Islamic Republic comes with a high cost that it will have to pay, crediting both the armed forces and the people of the Islamic Republic for the glorious victory. The last couple days since the ceasefire has held saw throngs of people come out into Tehran streets, to demonstrate in solidarity with the military, and to show defiance and that the 12-days of attacks did not bring the nation to its knees. There have been other signs of symbolic defiance and resistance as well, including public events and a concert by the Tehran Symphony Orchestra, which goes back nearly 100 years. On Wednesday, in the city's popular Azadi Square, reports https://www.cnn.com/world/live-news/israel-iran-conflict-us-trump-06-26-25-intl-hnk : As residents gathered for the performance, the orchestra played “Ey Iran,” the country’s unofficial national anthem that has long been considered a song of national pride and resistance and had once been banned by the Islamic Republic due to its association with anti-government sentiment. Established in 1933, the orchestra has survived multiple regimes, coups, revolution and wars, widely seen as a symbol of resilience. Its hardest days came during the term of hardline president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad when the orchestra was disbanded due to sanctions, financial difficulties and negligence. It total died and thousands were injured in the strikes, with Israel also claiming to have assassinated at least 14 Iranian nuclear scientists and many more high-ranking military commanders. But Israel, and Tel Aviv especially, had whole building and neighborhoods leveled, and had some of its military command centers hit by Iranian ballistic and hypersonic missiles. On the other side, much of Tehran was destroyed, and the Iranians admit that key nuclear facilities suffered significant damage; however, they have pledged that nuclear energy development will continue as a matter of national sovereignty.  Thu, 06/26/2025 - 08:50
Boeing Binge-Buying Sparks Biggest Jump In US Durable Goods Orders In 11 Years Boeing Binge-Buying Sparks Biggest Jump In US Durable Goods Orders In 11 Years Following last month's plunge in headline durable goods orders, preliminary May data was expected to surge on the back of plane orders following Trump's visit to the MidEast (and the Paris Air Show). Brace for Durable Goods surge. Consensus expects +8.5% but real number likely to come around +15.0% on a sharp increase in aircraft orders following Trump's visit to the Middle East. — zerohedge (@zerohedge) And they were right but the magnitude is incredible - orders rose a stunning 16.4% MoM, the biggest jump since July 2014... image Source: Bloomberg This was all driven by non-defense aircraft orders... which rose 230% MoM.. image Source: Bloomberg ...as 'ex-transports', orders rose just 0.5% MoM (still better than expected)... image Source: Bloomberg Capital goods shipments rose 0.5%, excluding defense and commercial aircraft, better than expected, adding to Q2 GDP growth hopes. Thu, 06/26/2025 - 08:48
Hey Dems: Unseat Mamdani And You’ll Win The 2028 National Election Hey Dems: Unseat Mamdani And You’ll Win The 2028 National Election Submitted by I think it was Mark Twain who said “every massive communist nightmare of a problem with a chance to destroy the most iconic city in American history is an opportunity in disguise”. Maybe it was Milton Friedman. Or Kim Kardashian. I can’t remember. But the point is that Zohran Mamdani’s win in the New York City Mayoral Democratic primary tonight could actually turn out to be a national moment of truth for the Democratic Party. After a bruising 2024 presidential defeat, one in which Democrats were widely criticized for alienating moderates and independents with a platform that veered too far left, the party now finds itself at a crossroads. Again. Among many, well-known (former) Democrats like Ana Kasparian, Bill Ackman, Joy Reid, Elon Musk and former Rep. Jared Golden have distanced themselves—if not removed themselves—from the party altogether. More will soon follow. This New York City mayoral election is no longer a local issue—it’s a symbolic referendum on whether Democrats have learned anything from their recent loss, or if they’re content to continue losing the middle in pursuit of ideological purity. 2024 should have been winnable for Democrats. The Republican Party fielded a polarizing candidate, the economy was relatively stable, and yet voters across the country turned away because they feared what the Democrats were becoming. Centrist voters who once leaned blue looked at the messaging, the priorities, the excesses and the socialism, activism and radical policy stances and simply said “enough”. In the nation’s most important city, Democrats are voting for a platform that feels like it was written during a fireside drum circle in the quad of Evergreen University. image Free housing. Free transit. Free groceries—courtesy of government-run stores. A policing strategy that replaces cops with counselors and bureaucrats with badges. Tax hikes that seem designed not to generate revenue, but to punish — and will assuredly lead to a massive capital outflow from New York. It’s not policy, it’s bullshit performance art that has no chance of being effective in one of the world’s most important geographic locations. And it is everything that turned off centrist Democrat voters in 2024. So here’s the opportunity: Democrats can make a statement—not just to New York, but to the country—that they are still the party of rational governance and common sense — and that they can self-correct. That they are capable of breaking with their worst parts when it matters. And it matters now. This means one thing for the Democratic party: backing a centrist, independent candidate in November who can beat Mamdani in the general. Not a protest candidate. Not a placeholder. A real, serious contender who speaks to the exhausted majority that is desperate for competence over chaos. 🔥 50% OFF FOR LIFE: Using this coupon entitles you to 50% off an annual subscription to Fringe Finance for life:  Yes, it would mean bypassing your own party’s nominee. Yes, it would mean a messy, unscripted break with tradition. But it would also be a powerful signal to the rest of the country: we heard you. We understand that winning elections in a diverse, divided nation means appealing to a broad coalition. Not just activists and donors, but homeowners, working-class voters, small business owners, families, and independents. Democrats have a chance—right now—to show they’ve learned from their mistakes. That they’re not doubling down on the same playbook that cost them the White House, House seats, and voter trust. Let’s be clear: the only viable path forward is an independent candidacy with full-throated support from party leaders, major donors, national figures, and the rank-and-file who quietly know this has gone too far. And the media must stop treating this like some heartwarming tale of a plucky outsider shaking up the system. This isn’t a feel-good story. It’s the slow-motion capture of a governing disaster in the making. If Democrats let it happen unchallenged, they’ll be complicit—not just in Mamdani’s mayoralty, but in further defining the national brand as unserious, unanchored, and unelectable. Because if Mamdani wins, it won’t just be a local experiment gone wrong. It’ll be seen as confirmation that the Democratic Party is unable—or unwilling—to police its own excesses. And that message won’t stop at the Hudson. It’ll ripple across every swing district, every suburban race, every national conversation where voters are quietly asking: who is looking out for the middle anymore? This is Democrats’ chance to answer. And I can’t believe I’m saying this, but I hope they don’t waste it. -- Please for free if you enjoyed the content.  image QTR’s Disclaimer: Please read my full legal disclaimer   with my best effort to uphold what the license asks, or with the permission of the author. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks or securities, just my opinions. I often lose money on positions I trade/invest in. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time, without further warning. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. I may or may not own names I write about and are watching. Sometimes I’m bullish without owning things, sometimes I’m bearish and do own things. Just assume my positions could be exactly the opposite of what you think they are just in case. If I’m long I could quickly be short and vice versa. I won’t update my positions. All positions can change immediately as soon as I publish this, with or without notice and at any point I can be long, short or neutral on any position. You are on your own. Do not make decisions based on my blog. I exist on the fringe. The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. These are not the opinions of any of my employers, partners, or associates. I did my best to be honest about my disclosures but can’t guarantee I am right; I write these posts after a couple beers sometimes. I edit after my posts are published because I’m impatient and lazy, so if you see a typo, check back in a half hour. Also, I just straight up get shit wrong a lot. I mention it twice because it’s that important. Wed, 06/25/2025 - 08:05
California Is America's Most Expensive State, Arkansas Its Least California Is America's Most Expensive State, Arkansas Its Least How far does a dollar really go across America? As inflation has raised everything from housing costs to the price of eggs to record levels, consumers are feeling the burden. While tariffs stand to raise prices even further—although no meaningful signs in official data show this yet—price pressures have few signs of abating. This graphic, . image How Price Parity Compares Across America To show the differences in prices across the country, the BEA compared each state to the national average, represented as 100 as of 2023. State Regional Price Parity (U.S. = 100) California 113 Washington DC 111 New Jersey 109 Hawaii 109 Washington 109 Massachusetts 108 New York 108 New Hampshire 105 Oregon 105 Maryland 104 Connecticut 104 Florida 104 Alaska 102 Rhode Island 101 Colorado 101 Arizona 101 Virginia 101 Delaware 99 Illinois 99 Minnesota 98 Pennsylvania 98 Texas 97 Maine 97 Nevada 97 Georgia 97 Vermont 97 Utah 95 Michigan 94 North Carolina 94 South Carolina 93 Wisconsin 93 Tennessee 93 Indiana 92 Ohio 92 Missouri 92 Idaho 91 Wyoming 91 Kentucky 91 New Mexico 90 Nebraska 90 Montana 90 Alabama 90 Kansas 90 West Virginia 90 Iowa 89 North Dakota 89 Louisiana 88 Oklahoma 88 South Dakota 88 Mississippi 87 Arkansas 87 Ranking as the nation’s most expensive state, prices in California are 13% higher than the national average. In particular, California’s housing rents are 58% higher overall, second-only to Washington, D.C.. at 69% in 2023. Typically, housing is the primary driver of price disparities across the country. At the same time, Californians pay more for groceries than any other state—at around 10% higher than the U.S. average. Ranking in third is New Jersey, driven largely by its proximity to New York. In addition to high housing costs, a separate report shows that people in the Garden State pay 32% more for household bills like utilities and health insurance than the U.S. average. At the other end of the spectrum, southern states like Arkansas and Mississippi offer some of the lowest costs of living. In August 2024, the   in Arkansas was just $203,067 compared to the U.S. median of about $385,000. Beyond housing costs, daily expenses like transportation and utilities are also comparatively lower. Similarly, median home prices in Mississippi stand at just $183,507, however, median household incomes fall below the national average, at $55,060. To learn more about this topic from an affordability perspective, check out this   on home affordability scores by U.S. state. Tue, 06/24/2025 - 22:10
The Coward's Bargain: How We Taught A Generation To Live In Fear The Coward's Bargain: How We Taught A Generation To Live In Fear Everyone's Afraid to Speak Someone our family has known forever recently told my sister that they've been reading my Substack and that if they wrote the things I write, people would call them crazy. I got a kick out of that—not because it's untrue, but because it reveals something darker about where we've ended up as a society. Most people are terrified of being themselves in public. image My sister’s response made me laugh: "People do call him crazy. He simply doesn't care.” The funniest part is that I don't even write the craziest stuff I research—just the stuff I can back up with sources and/or my own personal observations. I always try to stay rooted in logic, reason and facts though—I'm clear when I'm speculating and when I'm not. This same guy has sent me dozens of private messages over the last 4 or 5 years challenging me on stuff I share online. I'll respond with source material or common sense, and then—crickets. He disappears. If I say something he doesn’t want to hear, he vanishes like a child covering his ears. Over the last few years, I’ve been proven right about most of what we’ve argued about, and he’s been wrong. But it doesn’t matter—he’s got the memory of a gnat and the pattern never changes. But he'd never make that challenge publicly, never risk being seen engaging with my arguments where others might witness the conversation. This kind of private curiosity paired with public silence is everywhere—people will engage with dangerous ideas in private but never risk being associated with them publicly. It's part of that reflexive " " mindset that shuts down inquiry before it can even begin. But he's not alone. We've created a culture where wrongthink is policed so aggressively that even successful, powerful people whisper their doubts like they're confessing crimes. I was on a hike last year with a very prominent tech VC. He was telling me about his son's football team—how their practices kept getting disrupted because their usual field on Randall's Island was now being used to house migrants. He leaned in, almost whispering: "You know, I'm a liberal, but maybe the people complaining about immigration have a point." Here's a guy who invests mountains of money into companies that shape the world we live in, and he's afraid to voice a mild concern about policy in broad daylight. Afraid of his own thoughts. After I  , a coworker told me he totally agreed with my position—but he was angry that I'd said it. When the company didn't want to take a stand, I told them I would speak as an individual—on my own time, as a private citizen. He was pissed anyway. In fact, he was scolding me about the repercussions to the company. What's maddening is that this same person had enthusiastically supported the business taking public stands on other, more politically fashionable causes over the years. Apparently, using your corporate voice was noble when it was fashionable. Speaking as a private citizen became dangerous when it wasn’t. Another person told me they agreed with me but wished they were "more successful like me" so they could afford to speak out. They had "too much to lose." The preposterousness of this is staggering. Everyone who spoke out during COVID sacrificed—financially, reputationally, socially. I sacrificed plenty myself. But I'm no victim. Far from it. Since I was a young man, I've never measured achievement by finance or status—my benchmark for being a so-called successful person was owning my own time. Ironically, getting myself canceled was actually a springboard to that. For the first time in my life, I felt I'd achieved time ownership. Whatever I’ve achieved came from being raised by loving parents, working hard, and having the spine to follow convictions rationally. Those attributes, coupled with some great fortune, are the reason for whatever success I've had—they're not the reason I can speak now. Maybe this person should do some inward searching about why they're not more established. Maybe it's not about status at all. Maybe it's about integrity. This is the adult world we've built—one where courage is so rare that people mistake it for privilege, where speaking your mind is seen as a luxury only the privileged can afford, rather than a fundamental requirement for actually becoming established. And this is the world we're handing to our children. We Built the Surveillance State for Them I remember twenty years ago, my best friend's wife (who's also a dear friend) was about to hire someone when she decided to check the candidate's Facebook first. The woman had posted: “Meeting the whores at [company name]”—referring to my friend and her coworkers. My friend immediately withdrew the offer. I remember thinking this was absolutely terrible judgment on the candidate's part, however it was dangerous territory we were entering: the notion of living completely in public, where every casual comment becomes permanent evidence. Now that danger has metastasized into something unrecognizable. We've created a world where every stupid thing a fifteen-year-old says gets archived forever. Not just on their own phones, but screenshot and saved by peers who don't understand they're building permanent files on each other—even on platforms like Snapchat that promise everything disappears. We've eliminated the possibility of a private adolescence—and adolescence is supposed to be private, messy, experimental. It's the laboratory where you figure out who you are by trying on terrible ideas and throwing them away. But laboratories require the freedom to fail safely. What we've built instead is a system where every failed experiment becomes evidence in some future trial. Think about the dumbest thing you believed at sixteen. The most embarrassing thing you said at thirteen. Now imagine that moment preserved in high definition, timestamped, and searchable. Imagine it surfacing when you're thirty-five and running for school board, or just trying to move past who you used to be. If there was a record of everything I did when I was sixteen, I would have been unemployable. Come to think of it, I'm way older than that now and I'm unemployable anyway—but the truth still stands. My generation might have been the last to fully enjoy an analog existence as children. We got to be stupid privately, to experiment with ideas without permanent consequences, to grow up without every mistake being archived for future use against us. image I remember teachers threatening us with our "permanent record." We laughed—some mysterious file that would follow us forever? Turns out they were just early. Now we've built those records and handed the recording devices to children. Companies like Palantir have  . We're asking children to have adult judgment about consequences they can't possibly understand. A thirteen-year-old posting something stupid isn't thinking about college applications or future careers. They're thinking about right now, today, this moment—which is exactly how thirteen-year-olds are supposed to think. But we've built systems that treat childhood immaturity as a prosecutable offense. The psychological toll is staggering. Imagine being fourteen and knowing that anything you say might be used against you by people you haven't met yet, for reasons you can't anticipate, at some unknown point in the future. That's not adolescence—that's a police state built out of smartphones and social media. The result is a generation that's either paralyzed by self-consciousness or completely reckless because they figure they're already screwed. Some retreat into careful blandness, crafting personas so sanitized they might as well be corporate spokespeople for their own lives. Others go scorched earth—if everything's recorded anyway, why hold back? As   likes to say, there's Andrew Tate and then there's a bunch of incels—meaning the young men either become performatively brash and ridiculous, or they retreat entirely. The young women seem to either drift toward fearful conformity or embrace monetized exposure on platforms like OnlyFans. We’ve managed to channel an entire generation’s rebellion into the very systems designed to exploit them. The COVID Conformity Test This is how totalitarian thinking takes root—not through jackbooted thugs, but through a million small acts of self-censorship. When a venture capitalist whispers his concerns about immigration policy like he's confessing to a thought crime. When successful professionals agree with dissenting views privately but would never defend them publicly. When speaking obvious truths becomes an act of courage rather than basic citizenship. Orwell understood this perfectly. In 1984, the Party's greatest achievement wasn't forcing people to say things they didn't believe—it was making them afraid to believe things they weren't supposed to say. "The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake," O'Brien explains to Winston. "We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power." But the real genius was making citizens complicit in their own oppression, turning everyone into both prisoner and guard. History shows us how this works in practice. The Stasi in East Germany didn't just rely on secret police—they turned ordinary citizens into informants. By some estimates, one in seven East Germans was reporting on their neighbors, friends, even family members. The state didn't need to watch everyone; they got people to watch each other. But the Stasi had limitations: they could recruit informants, but they couldn't monitor everyone simultaneously, and they couldn't instantly broadcast transgressions to entire communities for real-time judgment. Social media solved both problems. Now we have total surveillance capability—every comment, photo, like, and share automatically recorded and searchable. We have instant mass distribution—one screenshot reaching thousands in minutes. We have volunteer enforcement—people eagerly participating in calling out "wrongthink" because it feels righteous. And we have permanent records—unlike Stasi files locked in archives, digital mistakes follow you forever. The psychological impact is exponentially worse because Stasi informants at least had to make a conscious choice to report someone. Now the reporting happens automatically—the infrastructure is always listening, always recording, always ready to be weaponized by anyone with a grudge or a cause. We saw this machinery in full operation during COVID. Remember how quickly "two weeks to flatten the curve" became orthodoxy? How questioning lockdowns, mask mandates, or vaccine efficacy wasn't just wrong—it was dangerous? How saying "maybe we should consider the trade-offs of closing schools" could get you labeled a grandma-killer? The speed at which dissent became heresy was breathtaking. History has shown us governments can be terrible to citizens. The hardest pill to swallow was the horizontal policing. Your neighbors, coworkers, friends, and family members became the enforcement mechanism. People didn't just comply; they competed—virtue-signaling their way into a collective delusion where asking basic questions about cost-benefit analysis became evidence of moral deficiency. Neighbors called police on neighbors for having too many people over. People photographed "violations" and posted them online for mass judgment. And the most insidious part? The people doing the policing genuinely believed they were the good guys. They thought they were protecting society from dangerous misinformation, not realizing they had become the misinformation—that they were actively suppressing the kind of open inquiry that's supposed to be the foundation of both science and democracy. The Ministry of Truth didn't need to rewrite history in real time. Facebook and Twitter did it for them, memory-holing inconvenient posts and banning users who dared to share pre-approved scientific studies that happened to reach unapproved conclusions. The Party didn't need to control the past—they just needed to control what you were allowed to remember about it. This wasn't an accident or an overreaction. This was a stress test of how quickly a free society could be transformed into something unrecognizable, and we failed spectacularly. Anyone who actually followed the science understood the only pandemic was one of cowardice. Worse, most people didn't even notice we were being tested. They thought they were just "following the science"—never mind that the data kept changing to match the politics, or that questioning anything had somehow become heretical. The beautiful thing about this system is that it's self-sustaining. Once you've participated in the mob mentality, once you've policed your neighbors and canceled your friends and stayed silent when you should have spoken up, you become invested in maintaining the fiction that you were right all along. Admitting you were wrong isn't just embarrassing—it's an admission that you participated in something monstrous. So instead, you double down. You disappear when confronted with inconvenient facts. Raising Prisoners And this brings us back to the children. They're watching all of this. But more than that—they're growing up inside this surveillance infrastructure from birth. The Stasi's victims at least had some years of normal psychological development before the surveillance state kicked in. These kids never get that. They're born into a world where every thought might be public, every mistake permanent, every unpopular opinion potentially life-destroying. The psychological impact is devastating. Research shows that children who grow up under constant surveillance—even well-meaning parental surveillance—show higher rates of anxiety, depression, and what psychologists call   They never develop internal locus of control because they never get to make real choices with real consequences. But this goes far deeper than helicopter parenting. The ability to hold unpopular opinions, to think through problems independently, to risk being wrong—these aren't just nice-to-haves. They're core to psychological maturity. When you eliminate those possibilities, you don't just get more compliant people; you get people who literally can't think for themselves anymore. They outsource their judgment to the crowd because they never developed their own. We're creating a generation of psychological cripples—people who are practiced at reading social cues and adjusting their thoughts accordingly, but who have never learned to form independent judgments. People who mistake consensus for truth and popularity for virtue. People who have been so thoroughly trained to avoid wrong-think that they've either lost—or never developed—the capacity for original thought entirely. But here's what's most disturbing: the kids are learning this behavior from us. They're watching adults who whisper their real thoughts, who agree privately but stay silent publicly, who confuse strategic silence with wisdom. They're learning that authenticity is dangerous, that having real convictions is a luxury they can't afford. They're learning that truth is negotiable, that principles are disposable, and that the most important skill in life is reading the room and adjusting your thoughts accordingly. The feedback loop is complete: adults model cowardice, children learn that genuine expression is risky, and everyone becomes practiced at self-censorship rather than self-examination. We've created a society where the Overton window isn't just narrow—it's actively policed by people who are terrified of stepping outside it, even when they privately disagree with its boundaries. This is the architecture of soft totalitarianism. Just the constant, gnawing fear that saying the wrong thing—or even thinking it too loudly—will result in social death. The beauty of this system is that it makes everyone complicit. Everyone has something to lose, so everyone stays quiet. Everyone remembers what happened to the last person who spoke up, so nobody wants to be next. The technology doesn't just enable this tyranny; it makes it psychologically inevitable. When the infrastructure punishes independent thinking before it can fully form, you get psychological arrested development on a mass scale. It’s already baked into education and employment through DEI and ESG. Wait till it's  ? We're passing this pathology down to our children like a genetic disorder. Except this disorder isn't inherited—it's enforced. And unlike genetic disorders, this one serves a purpose: it creates a population that's easy to control, easy to manipulate, easy to lead around by the nose as long as you control the social rewards and punishments. The Price of Truth I don't share my opinions because I "get away with it"—I don't get away with anything. I've paid socially, professionally, and even financially. But I do it anyway because the alternative is spiritual death. The alternative is becoming someone who messages critics privately but never takes a public stand, someone who's perpetually annoyed by others' courage but never exercises their own. The difference isn't ability or privilege. It's willingness. I'm open-minded and open-hearted. I can be convinced of anything—but show me, don't tell me. I'm willing to be wrong, willing to change my mind when new information comes to light or I gain a different perspective on an idea, willing to defend ideas I believe in even when it's uncomfortable. There are a lot of us right now realizing something isn't right—that we've been lied to about everything. We're trying to make sense of what we're seeing, asking uncomfortable questions, connecting dots that don't want to be connected. When we call that out, the last thing we need is people who haven't done the work standing in our way, carrying water for the establishment forces that are manipulating them. Most people could do the same thing if they chose to—they just don't choose to because they've been trained to see conviction as dangerous and conformity as safe. https://www.cato.org/blog/new-poll-62-say-political-climate-prevents-them-sharing-political-views  found that 62% of Americans say the political climate prevents them from sharing their political beliefs because others might find them offensive. Majorities of Democrats (52%), independents (59%), and Republicans (77%) all agree they have political opinions they are afraid to share. When adults who lived through COVID saw what happens when groupthink becomes gospel—how quickly independent thought gets labeled dangerous, how thoroughly dissent gets suppressed—many responded not by becoming more committed to free expression, but by becoming more careful about what they express. They learned the wrong lesson. What we're creating is a society where authenticity has become a radical act, where courage is so rare it looks like privilege. We're raising children who learn that being yourself is dangerous, that having real opinions carries unlimited downside risk. They're not just careful about what they say—they're careful about what they think. This doesn't create better people. It creates more fearful people. People who mistake surveillance for safety, conformity for virtue, and silence for wisdom. People who've forgotten that the point of having thoughts is sometimes to share them, that the point of having convictions is sometimes to defend them. The solution isn't to abandon technology or retreat into digital monasteries. But we need to create spaces—legal, social, psychological—where both kids and adults can fail safely. Where mistakes don't become permanent tattoos. Where changing your mind is seen as growth rather than hypocrisy. Where having convictions is valued over having clean records. Most importantly, we need adults who are willing to model courage instead of strategic silence—who understand that the price of speaking up is usually less than the price of staying quiet. In a world where everyone's afraid to say what they think, the honest voice doesn't just stand out—it stands up. Because right now, we're not just living in fear—we're teaching our children that fear is the price of participation in society. And a society built on fear isn't a society at all. It's just a more comfortable prison, one where the guards are ourselves and the keys are our own convictions, which we've learned to keep safely locked away. Whether it's experimental medicine or the masters of war lying again to drag us into what might become World War III—it's  —it's never been more important that people find their conviction, use their voice, and become a force for good. If you're still scared to push back against war propaganda, still getting swept up in manufactured outrage cycles, still choosing your principles based on which team is in power—then you may have learned absolutely nothing from the last few years. These days, friends are starting to confide in me that maybe I was right about the mRNA vaccines not working. I don't gloat—in fact, I appreciate the openness. But my standard reply is that they're four years late to the story. They'll know they've caught up when they realize the world is run by a bunch of satanic pedophiles. And yeah, I used to think that sounded crazy too. Fri, 06/20/2025 - 21:45
Thomas Massie Introduces Bill To Audit America's Gold Reserves Thomas Massie Introduces Bill To Audit America's Gold Reserves Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) introduced legislation on June 6 to audit gold reserves held by the United States. image Earlier this year, President Donald Trump and billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk that the administration would investigate Fort Knox, the Kentucky-based facility that stores U.S. gold reserves. “We’re going to go into Fort Knox to make sure the gold is there,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One in February. “You know that we’re going to go into Fort Knox? Did you know about that?” Several months later, the White House has not announced a formal investigation. Rep. Massie submitted a bill—titled the 📄.pdf —mandating the comptroller general to conduct and publish a full audit of the nation’s gold reserves. Co-sponsored by Reps. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio), Addison McDowell (R-N.C.), and Troy Nehls (R-Texas), the bill would grant the Government Accountability Office and third-party independent auditors access to any public or private depository where gold reserves and records are stored. This would include deep storage locations such as Fort Knox. The bill would also require full disclosure of all gold-related transactions, such as leases, loans, sales, and swaps, over the past 50 years. If the legislation is signed into law, the audit is projected to take up to one year and will be conducted every five years. “Americans deserve transparency and accountability from the institutions that underpin our currency,” Massie said in a . “In February, President Trump said ‘We’re going to Fort Knox ... to make sure the gold is there.’ The Gold Reserve Transparency Act of 2025 will provide the full disclosure President Trump seeks and the American public deserves.” Gold is also stored at the Denver Mint, West Point Mint, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Fort Knox is typically at the epicenter of the conversation since it accounts for approximately half of the total U.S. gold reserves. Estimates suggest that out of America’s 261 million troy ounces of gold, Fort Knox holds more than 147 million. The yellow metal has captured headlines this year. Last month, gold prices reached an all-time high of $3,500 per ounce before paring their gains. As of June 10, an ounce of gold is trading at about $3,350. At the state level, there have been initiatives to make gold, as well as silver, legal tender. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed legislation— —that would recognize gold and silver coins as legal tender. The bill also exempts gold and silver coins from sales tax. Every coin must be marked with its weight, purity, and mint of origin. Auditing Audits CEO of Money Metals Depository Stefan Gleason said Massie’s legislation is good news. “It’s been literally decades since actual inventories and assays have been conducted with respect to U.S. gold reserves, and the Department of the Treasury has lost records as well as failed to account for many occasions when vault compartments were inexplicably opened and resealed without new audits,” Gleason said in a statement. image Three 1-kilogram gold bullion bars at a gold dealer's shop, in Birmingham, England, on Dec. 13, 2023. Christopher Furlong/Getty Images The last full audit of Fort Knox’s gold holdings was in September 1974. A physical inspection was performed by then-Treasury Secretary William Simon, who also invited congressional officials and the media to tour the location and inspect reserves. Independent organizations have stated that the audit conducted more than 50 years ago did not compare serial numbers against official records, examine the gold bars for purity, or perform a final tally of the gold bullion. “The history of the ‘audits’ reveals red flags: lost records and broken compartment seals without explanation or reauditing,” Jp Cortez, the executive director of the public policy group Sound Money Defense League, told The Epoch Times. “As Money Metals gold researcher Jan Nieuwenhuijs has meticulously documented, these practices wouldn’t pass muster at a private depository.” U.S. officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, have pushed back against claims that domestic gold holdings are not subject to audits. In an with Bloomberg Television, Bessent said that the U.S. government performs an annual audit of the country’s gold reserves. “We do an audit every year. ... I can tell the American people on camera right now, there was a report, Sept. 30, 2024, all the gold is there,” Bessent said in February. “Any U.S. senator who wants to come visit it can arrange a visit through our office.” The Treasury’s Office of Inspector General published a 📄.pdf in October containing its audit findings. “In our opinion, the Schedules present fairly, in all material respects, the balances of the Department’s United Gold Reserves Held by Federal Reserve Banks as of September 30, 2024 and 2023, in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles,” the report stated. Cortez said that Bessent might be mistaken or misled regarding the audits. “An audit of the schedule of seals isn’t an audit of what’s inside, especially since there were issues before those compartment seals were placed. Audits are never [a] one-and-done affair anyway,” he said. The U.S. Mint released an account summary of U.S. monetary gold reserves in September. Other officials have informed lawmakers that the U.S. government is aware of all the nation’s gold holdings. “And we know where it is. We know how much it is. And we know that it is there and none of it has been removed,” former Treasury Inspector General Eric Thorson 📄.pdf at a 2011 Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy and Technology hearing. The Epoch Times reached out to the White House and Massie’s office for comment. Tue, 06/10/2025 - 18:55
"Worse Than The 2008 Financial Crisis" – Germany Becomes A Nation Of Bankruptcy With No End In Sight "Worse Than The 2008 Financial Crisis" – Germany Becomes A Nation Of Bankruptcy With No End In Sight Germany is bracing for a continued surge in major insolvencies throughout 2025 and even 2026, according to a recent analysis by credit insurer Allianz Trade. This all comes after a disastrous 2024, which saw a record-breaking number of bankruptcies in the country. image Allianz Trade forecasts an overall increase of 11 percent in corporate insolvencies in Germany this year, reaching approximately 24,400 cases. A further 3 percent rise to 25,050 cases is anticipated for 2026. These insolvencies put an estimated 210,000 jobs at risk across Germany. In the first quarter of this year, 16 large German companies—those with revenues of €50 million or more—filed for insolvency. While this is a slight decrease of three cases compared to the same period last year, it’s double the number recorded in the first quarter of 2023. She predicted Germany's economic demise 3 years ago. Now, the German economy, run by the left and Greens, is in shambles. Volkswagen plans to close 3 plants and cut 30,000 workers. — Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) Milo Bogaerts, CEO of Allianz Trade in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, expressed concern over the persistently high number of major insolvencies, attributing it partly to U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariff policy. He warned that no respite is expected, even after 2024, which was a record-breaking negative year for insolvencies. “Given the bleak economic outlook both in Germany and in global trade, and the many uncertainties caused by the tariff storm, we expect many major insolvencies and thus significant losses to continue in 2025,” Bogaerts stated. He added that these large-scale insolvencies will likely have a ripple effect on supplier companies, potentially creating “particularly large holes in their coffers” and impacting supply chains. However, alarm bells are ringing across the country. The Federal Association of German Industry (BDI) published a declaration by more than 100 associations at the beginning of April where they directly addressed the ruling CDU and SPD. At the time, they were still working on a coalition agreement. The BDI stated: “In the past few weeks, the economic situation has deteriorated dramatically. The facts are undeniable. Germany is in a serious economic crisis. A comparison with other countries shows that this crisis is primarily homemade.” The BDI is also apparently unhappy with the coalition’s details on tax policy. “In terms of tax policy, the coalition lags behind what is necessary. In the future, every scope must be used to relieve companies in order for the tax burden to quickly become internationally competitive,” said Tanja Gönner, BDI’s general manager. “The contract rightly formulates an ambitious modernization agenda for the state and administration, which must now also be followed by a determined implementation…. The bottom line is that we will measure the federal government by whether it will make the state more efficient and modernized.” 🇩🇪🚨 Ford Germany plans to cut 4,000 jobs as Berlin's economic disaster continues to unfold. "The entire automotive industry is in crisis all over the world, in Europe and especially in Germany. This transition to electro-mobility is hitting us very, very hard." — Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) Sectors particularly affected include textile-related retail, the automotive supply industry, and healthcare. In the first quarter of 2025 alone, three German hospitals and three large textile companies filed for insolvency, alongside two automotive suppliers and two chemical companies. In 2024, Germany saw a negative record of 87 major insolvencies, a 36 percent increase from the previous year. The combined turnover of these affected companies reached €17.4 billion, marking a 55 percent jump compared to 2023. In an article for  , reporters spoke to Jürgen Philippi, a publicly appointed auctioneer who also writes court reports for bankruptcy advisors. He has been working in the business for 30 years. “There was a lot going on in the 2008 financial crisis and subsequent years. But now it’s worse. More and more industries are affected. I haven’t seen that yet,” said Philippi, who is so overburdened with bankruptcies that he has turned many clients away. He also says there are fewer and fewer buyers willing to try and turn companies around. “I am increasingly observing that managing directors do not want to continue their battered companies, although there are still market opportunities. Their reasoning? Taxes that are too high, too much bureaucracy,” said Philippi. “‘I don’t want to do that anymore,’ I hear that more and more,” he added. Thu, 06/05/2025 - 03:30
UK Rail Station Volunteer Ousted For Wrongthink Over 'Pride' Train... And He Is Gay UK Rail Station Volunteer Ousted For Wrongthink Over 'Pride' Train... And He Is Gay https://modernity.news/2025/05/27/rail-station-volunteer-ousted-for-wrongthink-over-pride-train-and-he-is-gay A volunteer has been banned from a railway charity scheme in the UK after he asked a basic question regarding a train that had been wrapped in ‘Pride’ colours. image Here is the train in question: What awful hateful thing did Mr. Toomer say? He commented on a social media post about the rebranded train, asking if it would “return to its natural state once the event is over.” Oh the horror. He was then “summoned” to attend a meeting with railway officials and informed that he views (he didn’t express any views) “do not align with [WMR’s] values and mission.” He was then banned from the station volunteer group altogether as punishment for merely hinting at not being fully onboard with the trans train. Mr Toomer told reporters “As a gay man myself, I want to stress that this wasn’t about objecting to visibility.” Yes, even the gays can’t ask questions about the relentless ‘progress’ of THE MESSAGE. “My concern was the increasing tendency of public transport organisations to take visible positions on divisive issues,” Toomer further outlines, adding “The Progress Pride flag has become associated with particular ideological stances – particularly around gender – which not everyone, including many within the LGB community, fully endorse.” “My position was simply that public services should remain neutral and welcoming to everyone,” he emphasised. Noooooo. That opinion won’t do. While the Free Speech Union has demanded that the train company “apologise for this vindictive decision and reinstate him,” the Telegraph gleaned that the company had basically scoured Mr. Toomer’s social media activity and discerned that it was “problematic”. A WMR spokesman said “Our company has a proud culture of inclusion and allyship,” adding “We believe the views Mr Toomer has expressed on social media on a range of subjects are at odds with these values and could be harmful or offensive to our colleagues, customers or other volunteers.” Wrongthink then, essentially. When asked to point out examples of the “problematic” posts by Mr Toomer, the spokesman could not or would not do so. The case officer for the Free Speech Union, Rebekah Brown, remarked, “I expect the vast majority of West Midland’s Railway’s customers will agree with Mr Toomer, not with WMR’s enforced ideological orthodoxy.” “A train company has no business acting as the arbiter of permissible opinion for volunteers, with these chilling consequences for individuals’ freedom of speech in their daily lives,” Ms Brown further urged. Forcing ideological views on everyone, such as plastering Pride flags across stations, trains, and buses every June, often stems from bandwagon jumping and virtue signaling rather than any genuine public demand. Literally EVERY train and bus company in the UK does it. Our Pride train officially has a name and we are ✨e m o t i o n a l✨ — Avanti West Coast (@AvantiWestCoast) Our Pride train has just departed for its first official journey from London Euston to Manchester Piccadilly. The train is serviced by our full LGBTQ+ crew, creating not just a Pride train, but a Pride experience 🌈 https://twitter.com/hashtag/LiveProud?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw — Avanti West Coast (@AvantiWestCoast) Train gets covered in LGBTQI+ Progress flags. — Oli London (@OliLondonTV) As if it *knew* it were needed – like a train-shaped superhero summoned from afar – the Thameslink https://twitter.com/hashtag/Pride?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw — Tim Dunn (@MrTimDunn) Our fabulous https://twitter.com/hashtag/PrideTrain?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw is ready for Manchester Pride this Friday and we want YOU to come along for the fun✨ Here's where you can join us: 🌈 London Euston (10:20) 🌈 Milton Keynes Central (10:50) 🌈 Stoke-On-Trent (11:48) 🌈 Stockport (12:17) 🌈 Manchester Piccadilly (12:28) — Virgin Trains Ticketing (@VirginTrainsTix) Seen our https://twitter.com/hashtag/PrideOfScotRail?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw train yet? Don’t worry if not, it’ll be wearing this design until it needs repainted in 2029! — ScotRail (@ScotRail) 🌈To mark https://twitter.com/hashtag/PrideMonth?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw this morning! 🚆The train will be running between and Bournemouth today. 🏳️‍🌈We are immensely proud to celebrate diversity and support equality. Happy Pride Month! https://twitter.com/hashtag/PRIDE2020?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw — SWR Help (@SW_Help) Look who has had a glow-up for Pride 🤩 🏳️‍🌈 Keep an eye out for our special bus and Overground train. More coming soon… Tag a pal who would like a P-ride on one of these! https://twitter.com/hashtag/Pride2023?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw — TfL (@TfL) Update: I am at Reading railway station but alas cannot hear you above the volume of the screaming queerness of — Tim Dunn (@MrTimDunn) We were delighted to bring some colour to one of our new Intercity Express Trains 800 008 today and join in with the Pride month celebrations. Send us your pics of the https://twitter.com/hashtag/trainbow?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw — GWR (@GWRHelp) UK adds “intersex-inclusive Pride train” to their railway network — End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) The transgenders on the bus go snip snip snip… — m o d e r n i t y (@ModernityNews) These things are also often overseen by wannabe activists working within the sector, some of whom turn out to be right wrong uns. *  *  * Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via  . Thu, 05/29/2025 - 05:00
FBI Probing Allegations Of 'Targeted Violence' Against Religious Groups in Seattle: Official FBI Probing Allegations Of 'Targeted Violence' Against Religious Groups in Seattle: Official The FBI is investigating after officials said a religious event in Seattle was disrupted by violence, a top FBI official said on May 27. “We have asked our team to fully investigate allegations of targeted violence against religious groups at the Seattle concert,” Dan Bongino, the FBI’s deputy director, on social media platform X. “Freedom of religion isn’t a suggestion.” The office of Seattle Mayor Bruce Harrell did not respond to a request for comment by publication time. image Organizers said the May 24 event was held at Cal Anderson Park in support of “the sanctity of human life, the sacrality of biological gender, the importance of the nuclear family, and the right to freedom of speech and religion.” They said the movement organizing the event stands against indoctrination of children “by a liberal, political, and sexual agenda that seeks to destroy their God-given identities.” Counterprotesters, including the Freedom Socialist Party, https://everout.com/seattle/events/protest-fascist-family-values/e206800/ their demonstration was meant to “keep your bibles off our bodies.” Clashes at the event resulted in 23 arrests, the Seattle Police Department . One juvenile was released. The rest of those arrested were charged with assault and obstruction. The White House Faith Office in a statement on Tuesday that it condemned “the violent disruption of Seattle’s MayDay USA worship event.” “We affirm the fundamental rights to free speech and religious freedom for all Americans, as protected by federal law. Public officials must protect the inalienable rights of all citizens, regardless of their faith or religious beliefs. We urge the City of Seattle to uphold these rights at all faith-based events, safeguarding the ability of people of faith to gather and express their beliefs without fear of harassment or violence,” the office said. After the event, Harrell, a Democrat, it a “far-right rally” that he said was meant “to provoke a reaction by promoting beliefs that are inherently opposed to our city’s values, in the heart of Seattle’s most prominent LGBTQ+ neighborhood.” He said that anarchists infiltrated counterprotesters and “inspired violence,” which led to officers making arrests and asking organizers to end the event early. The request was accepted. Organizers said in a statement to news outlets that “under Mayor Harrell’s leadership, the city of Seattle has continued its spiral into lawlessness and dysfunction while the First Amendment rights of citizens to peacefully assemble has been disregarded.” The Seattle mayor’s office later statements from some faith leaders that offered support for Harrell and criticized the event organizers. Russell Johnson, the lead pastor at Pursuit NW, on X that Harrell should apologize to Christians in the state “for his bigoted remarks after folks who were holding a peaceful worship event at Cal Anderson Park were violently assaulted for the high crime of expressing their deeply held religious beliefs in the form of a permitted worship event on city property.” Wed, 05/28/2025 - 17:40