The sweet 16th Amendment… Nothing to do with driving, despite what the smooth side of my brain might hope, but everything to do with giving Congress the power to tax income directly. When it started in 1913 (federal): 1% on incomes up to $20,000 ($600,000 today) 2% on $20,000 - $50,000 3% on $50,000 - $75,000 4% on $75,000 - $100,000 5% on $100,000 - $250,000 6% on $250,000 - $500,000 7% on $500,000+ ($15 million today) Most Americans paid 1% or nothing at all. What people are paying now (federal): 10% on incomes up to $11,600 12% on $11,600 - $47,150 22% on $47,150 - $100,525 24% on $100,525 - $191,950 32% on $191,950 - $243,725 35% on $243,725 - $609,350 37% on $609,350+ Even the lowest earners today pay 10%, compared to 1% or less in 1913. In terms of purchasing power, what was barely taxable 112 years ago now puts you in the highest tax bracket. In less than 1.5 lifetimes, we’ve gone from a system where taxes barely touched the average worker to one where the middle class is handing over nearly half of their income when you factor in income tax, payroll tax, sales tax, property tax, capital gains tax, and the countless others that didn’t even exist a century ago. Too rich to evade, too poor to do it legally, just right to be taxed to high heavens. If that doesn’t spell evisceration…I’m beginning to understand why they never sent me to the spelling bee. Sadly, life doesn’t get better for the poor just because there are more of them than the middle class. The middle class isn’t disappearing by accident; it’s being bled dry. The only ones winning are the ones with direct access to the money printer. Yes, the ones you HATE. Yes, the ones you ADORE. No matter your feelings, one fact remains: having close proximity to or controlling the money printer and being elite are the same thing. The tax burden doesn’t shrink, it just shifts. A dollar saved is a dollar lost, so the only real solution is to stop playing the game entirely. Opt out. Opt for hard money that can’t be taxed through inflation. Opt for Bitcoin. image
Secessio Plebis: Galt’s Gulch before it was cool, and proof that the original Roman Plebs would be Bitcoin Maxis History repeats itself, but the lessons remain the same. The common people have always held the power to resist their rulers, not through protest, but through strategic withdrawal. The secessio plebis of ancient Rome proved this long before Atlas Shrugged was written. When the plebs walked away, the system faltered, because the so-called commoners weren’t common at all. They were the backbone of society; more productive than the elites who ruled them. And without their participation, everything collapsed. Bitcoin is the modern, digital secessio plebis: a peaceful exit from a corrupt, inflationary system. If appealing for reform worked, it would have worked by now. But it hasn’t…and it won’t. Because the game is rigged in favor of those who print the money, write the rules, and move the goalposts. You can’t fix a system designed to control you. You don’t fight it…You abandon it. That’s what Bitcoin represents: an exit. Both its supporters and its suppressors call it that: one with hope, the other with fear. And the intensity of their emotions only confirms the truth: the system can’t survive without its plebs, and the plebs are leaving. image
The words staking and Bitcoin don’t belong in the same sentence. Bitcoin operates on proof-of-work, not proof-of-stake, so if a platform claims to offer Bitcoin staking, the obvious question is: Who’s paying the yield? If Bitcoin itself doesn’t generate rewards, then any so-called yield is coming from a third party; likely through lending, rehypothecation, or some other opaque financial mechanism. And with that comes counterparty risk. So, is that yield really worth the trade off? You’re giving up the security of holding your own Bitcoin in exchange for promises…promises that have a history of being broken. Time and time again, centralized platforms have collapsed, taking depositors’ Bitcoin down with them. The illusion of easy yield lures in the greedy and the uninformed, but in the end, Bitcoin rewards those who understand its true value: sovereignty, security, and scarcity. Mainstream adoption may be growing, but clown world persists; offering financial gimmicks that Bitcoin was designed to render obsolete. The real yield of Bitcoin isn’t in staking schemes; it’s in holding an asset that remains free from dilution, counterparty risk, and centralized failure. image
I’m bullish on sats back…really any way that helps people accumulate more Bitcoin, as long as it’s done ethically and without rugging innocent people. The beauty of it is that it’s not just stacking; it’s a Trojan horse for orange pilling. If someone asks me why I choose sats over fiat rewards, that’s an open door to shift their perspective on money itself. The best orange pills aren’t forced; they happen naturally when people start questioning the system on their own. Here’s my link:
Putting the treasury on a blockchain? That sounds about as smart as putting balls in a blender. Have people forgotten how inherently inefficient blockchains are? Government scale operations require speed and efficiency, yet here we are, watching people propose more friction and complexity. Isn’t that the opposite of what was promised? Governments are built on trust. There is no government without it. A trustless system for a trusted entity is a contradiction. What’s being proposed here isn’t innovation; it’s a rebranded version of the failed DAOs of the past. Maybe that’s where the idea should stay. And what about transparency? 100% visibility into government spending might sound good in theory, but in practice, it means giving away every strategic advantage to competitors who aren’t playing by the same rules. Nations operate like living organisms: radical, untested changes can be fatal. Then there’s the issue of control. If the government is the only entity with the ability to alter the system, who exactly is ensuring they don’t exploit it? The government? Yeah right. Read a book. Governments already have a money printer…why would they design a blockchain system that doesn’t serve their interests? And let’s talk about smart contracts. Do we really trust the government to build secure, unexploitable code when they can’t even run basic programs efficiently? If their blockchain innovation is anything like the rest of their work, it’ll be a glitch-ridden, easily manipulated disaster. Some people believe putting transactions on a blockchain will solve government corruption. But corruption isn’t a software bug; it’s human nature. And until we accept the reality of human nature, Bitcoin won’t fully make sense. Notice I didn’t say blockchain. The reason governments push for blockchain, not Bitcoin, is simple: they’ve already planned their corruption. Bitcoin removes their ability to manipulate money, and deep down, they know it. They don’t fear blockchain…they fear the accountability that Bitcoin imposes. And they know their reckoning is coming. image
THE RACE HASN’T EVEN STARTED YET. View quoted note →
Sats feeling cheap at $97K is a strange sensation, one that only makes sense if you understand where this is all headed. Nearly 30% of U.S. states have proposed a Bitcoin strategic reserve, a shift that would have seemed unthinkable just a few years ago. The very idea of governments positioning themselves for a Bitcoin standard only reinforces the inevitable: the window to stack at any cheap price is closing. If we drop lower, I won’t see it as a setback; I’ll see it as a gift. Because in the end, it’s not about the price today; it’s about securing a future for your bloodline. image
Well said 🫡 View quoted note →
I don’t see anything as bad for Bitcoin, even when it stops moving up and to the right. In fact, I thrive in bear markets; they’re my favorite. My conviction doesn’t waver when prices drop; if anything, my stance feels more genuine then, free from the noise of euphoria. Right now, my sentiment aligns with the crowd, but only because the truth, one that once seemed so obvious to me it was frustrating, has finally started to dawn on the masses. Real Bitcoiners know that your first bull run is your initiation, your class. But what they don’t tell you is that the bear market is your final exam. Did you truly graduate from the class of 2020 if you panic-sold your stack in ‘22, whether out of fear or because FTX rugged you? No. Survival in Bitcoin isn’t about catching the highs…it’s about enduring the lows. You’re advantaged if you enjoy them. image
It’s refreshing to see Bitcoin’s dominance rising despite relentless paid marketing and lobbying from altcoins. Even with billions spent trying to divert attention, Bitcoin still commands around 62% of the entire digital asset market. Think about that: after years of hype, VC funding, and false promises, Bitcoin remains the foundation of the space. Now, imagine if the market fully recognized the difference between digital gold and digital fool’s gold. If capital weren’t siphoned into dead end projects and speculative distractions, Bitcoin’s value could be 77% higher ($171,000). That’s not just a number; it’s a reflection of misplaced trust and a failure to grasp the fundamental difference between scarcity and dilution, between true decentralization and corporate capture. This is what was taken from you; not just a higher Bitcoin price, but the clarity to see through deception. The noise, the distractions, the endless cycle of pump and dumps…they exist to keep people from understanding what Bitcoin actually represents: the hardest money ever created, a financial revolution that doesn’t need marketing, only time. image