Ge nostr. Noticing that I am beginning to make the base assumption that any image I see or statement made online (or on television) has been altered or authored by AI. Processing new information is now entirely dependent on verification. Some might say, always has been.

I think we're wrong. We've been trying to answer the question of existence (or being). I'm sensing this is somewhat misplaced, and all thought depending on this question and its answers is misleading and tainted by this root focus. This affects most "first principles" reasoning. I'm considering that existence/being is the wrong frame. But that begs the question of what would be the right frame, the right question to resolve and ponder? I'm thinking it is one of manifestation. What we choose to see, to create, and of course, to feel. This allows us to reimagine action, sensation, connection - a different approach to our lives. I don't know where I may end up with these ideas. I'm sure to experience a lot along the way, though. #philosophy

Gn nostr. Started @Alekandar Svetski's book last night. I think I'm almost to the part where he starts writing.

Gn nostr. I feel like there is much I could say, but wisdom would dictate I STFU. I believe I need to read Svetski's new book. I am also pursuing a belief in relentless optimism, while simultaneously believing everything is fucked. As it should be, if things are to improve.

Gn nostr. I hold a larger strategic reserve than Microstrategy. Tou can take that to the bank! (But why would you?)

Gn nostr. - My 21 sats is apparently still worth 2c. The rest is a rounding error! - Bitcoin will always be worth 58k, no matter how much the US govt tries to inflate their way to new ATHs.