Afternoon is when weak men fade. Discipline doesn’t. Ignote the fire, push through, finish what you started. Then take what you came for.⚔️🧡

Can confirm View quoted note →

They might ignore you. They might ghost you. Doesn’t matter. A King doesn’t chase. He builds. One day they’ll see what was lost, and by then, you’ll be too far above for them to reach.

GM... You can waste your time, or you can forge it into something that outlives you. That’s the only choice.

Quiet men with discipline move mountains. Loud men with none get buried under them.

Most men fear failure. I hunt it. Each scar is proof I built something worth bleeding for.

Now I do Asics: Bottom line: M50S ≈ 26J/TH vs S19j Pro ≈ 29.5 J/TH. MicroBT wins on efficiency and field reliability. Bitmain wins on parts availability and swap speed. On 240 V, both are happy; Whatsminer PSUs are 220–240 V only and use one C19 lead; S19j Pro uses APW12 (200–240 V) and needs two power cords. Core specs MicroBT Whatsminer M50S: ~126–130 TH/s, ~3.3–3.4 kW, ≈26 J/TH, PSU P221B/P222B AC 220–240 V, single C19. Bitmain Antminer S19j Pro: 96–100 TH/s, ~2.8–3.1 kW, 29.5 J/TH, APW12 PSU AC 200–240 V, two power cords required. 240 V electrical differences Whatsminer: Integrated top-mounted PSU (P221/P222). Input 220–240 V only. One C19 ≥16 A per unit simplifies cord sets and PDU design. Antminer: APW12 modular PSU. Input 200–240 V. Two cords to the PSU; more outlets per rack, but easier PSU swap. Data-center ops: pros and cons Whatsminer M50S Pros: Better efficiency; strong stability reports at scale; single-lead power; fewer DOA/failures vs recent Bitmain lines per operator reports. Cons: PSU and chassis integration means heavier units and fewer third-party spares; vendor-specific parts (P221/P222) and firmware; slower init than some Antminers in tests. Antminer S19j Pro Pros: Huge aftermarket for hashboards, fans, APW12; fast boot; lots of repair docs and vendors; easy PSU swaps. Cons: Worse efficiency; community reports higher DOA/failure rates on several Bitmain 19/21-series batches; more cords and outlets to manage. Failure rate and labor cost model (use your scale) Field chatter shows Whatsminer ~2% annual failures vs Antminer ~8% depending on batch; S19j Pro is older but still sees board/PSU swaps. Treat these as assumptions, not guarantees. Example for a 1,350-unit farm, $150/hr tech time, 2.0 h per incident (R&R, test, ticket): Whatsminer @ 2% ⇒ 27 incidents/yr ⇒ $8,100 labor/yr. Antminer @ 4% ⇒ 54 incidents/yr ⇒ $16,200 labor/yr. Delta ≈ $8,100/yr more labor for Antminer. Scale linearly with your unit count and your measured failure rates. Quick take If you want fewer headaches: M50S. If you want fastest swaps and cheapest parts cabinet: S19j Pro. On power distribution: both standardize cleanly at ~240 V PDUs; Whatsminer’s single-cord layout simplifies outlet density. My recommendation is MicroBT all day View quoted note →