Virginia’s push to police teen screen time edges the internet closer to an era where every click comes with an ID check.

The collapse of the case marks a sharp rebuke of local authorities’ attempt to criminalize political satire in small-town Texas.

Sarah Rogers' comments draw a new line in the sand between America’s First Amendment and Europe’s tightening grip on online speech.

By design or by speed, the legislation trims civil liberties into administrative details.

Barrett’s comments cast the First Amendment as a safeguard against the moral fragility she sees in modern democracies.

The court’s ruling pauses Texas’s attempt to turn app stores into gatekeepers of digital speech.

Dallas weighs turning a crime-fighting shortcut into a citywide surveillance habit.

In defending the ordinary citizen’s right to privacy, the courtroom moment revealed how fragile that right has become.

Victoria’s push to unmask online users marks a turning point where the rhetoric of safety begins to eclipse the right to speak without fear.

Repealing Section 230 wouldn’t tame Big Tech; it would hand the keys of online speech to the few companies wealthy enough to survive the lawsuits.