should bluesky team just take the L and offer to host For You and/or make it default? i see many reasons why not (depending on third party often ends up being a problem) but how is this the situation that first party can't get its own main feed right. this is so embarrassing
lol. lmao even RE:
not sure this is what i think it is, but i like the idea of embedding widgets from different atproto apps RE:
is there any feed that moves fast enough that there'll be 40+ new posts in a minute, but that's still chronological?
i wonder what the app team is working on. though it's also partially my fault with past prioritization, the app still feels like a less polished and incomplete replica of old twitter. the genuinely novel parts (feeds, labelers) feel poorly bolted on. and the default feed is still not good enough.
there's a feature i want [bsky.app]( ) to have and it still doesn't have it and do i really have to do it myself? maybe w claude
i try to imagine i’m directing an intern. i give it manageable isolated tasks, try to separate research from execution, restart when it stops doing good work. i don’t micromanage the code but i’m very picky about the layering, and heavily steer towards constraints i want it to satisfy. RE:
new RSC Explorer example: binary data [rscexplorer.dev?s=binary]( ) https://morel.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:fpruhuo22xkm5o7ttr2ktxdo&cid=bafkreifdmwp2s3vqzaeeax2mcct3yensk2dabbyvdpp4zb6uduxujdsery
日本のユーザーの皆さん、こんにちは!Blueskyが従来のソーシャルメディアプラットフォームと根本的に何が違うのかを知りたい方は、私の記事をご覧ください。残念ながら英語で書かれていますが、Google翻訳で翻訳したバージョンはこちらです。 [Open Social — overreacted]( )
fixed [rscexplorer.dev]( ) so that it doesn't wait for the whole stream to resolve before enabling stream step through kind of a basic thing to have missed, anyway it's fixed now