i suppose this is starting soon? [React Conf 2025 Day 1]( )
i roll with that RE:
someone needs to write a canonical article about this so we can just link to it in the future RE:
if you want to try [typelex.org]( ) in your project, i think it's ready for initial testing and feedback. it's basically "coffeescript for lexicons", for better or worse. feel free to file issues on @npub19y6x...yh78: [tangled.org/@danabra.mov...]( ) thanks! RE: [typelex โ€“ An experimental Type...]( )
agree both issues are confusing and i would love to see both fixed RE:
iโ€™m less concerned about this now. i experienced deep flow vibecoding yesterday. in some ways it was actually deeper than manual coding because (when it worked well) i was able to explore ideas and directions that would normally take me days (due to lack of domain knowledge, boilerplate etc) RE: View quoted note โ†’
fantastic blog post from [@vjeux.bsky.social]( ) that everyone should read! RE: View quoted note โ†’
somehow i didnโ€™t realize it even though it stares at me from the screenshot, but one input file with many namespaces will automatically generate JSON files with correct directories, one per namespace. strangely this also means you can define parts of a single Lexicon via multiple source files RE:
oooooooh RE:
may i present to you, my weekend project [typelex โ€“ An experimental Type...]( )