oh that's neat! RE:
barely a mention of atproto in this entire discussion (as well as the article) [The future is not self-hosted,...]( )
tbh a lot of bluesky brand feels to me like "we added a hacky thing to solve what felt like a problem at a time and now we can't ever remove it although no other platform does this" RE: View quoted note →
haven't watched fully yet but this explainer looks very promising [But how do AI images/videos ac...]( )
i worked on this proof for the entire week, and i finally got it working! i feel like i learned a lot about how to work with Lean. the proof is about showing that it's possible to construct a set of all functions from one set to another as long as you have some way to construct a set of all subsets [See https://leanprover.zulipch...](https://gist.github.com/gaearon/25a437a7b1773f4af94146af13d4fbd2 )
there's this liminal space of learning ability where you can already fix things with some luck but you don't fully understand why your fixes work. it's a funny feeling, like you have to rely on luck a bit and still can get royally lost but you're also not walking completely randomly. drunkard's fix
i think that’s pretty well thought out, especially the assurance that the internal repo main follows the public repo with force pushes. RE: View quoted note →
oh no, posts no longer have data-feed-context in the webapp. so it's harder to see where bad Discover posts are coming from :(
one thing that’s comforting about mathematics is that it doesn’t seem likely to fall apart with the passage of time (it did feel close to that a few times, but each time, it only came back richer and more magical — imo)
is there, in any sense, a field of amateur mathematics? i don’t mean in the “it doesn’t actually work” sense, although sometimes it is a consequence of being an amateur, but in a more general “tinkering but not too seriously” sense. in some other fields, amateurs make important contributions