The extent to which the London Standard (formerly the Evening Standard) properly hates London and always has properly hated London is really quite the phenomenon. It's like having a temperance crusader running CAMRA. I recommend [www.londoncentric.media]( ) instead. RE:
I'm no expert - is this good? RE:
China’s charm offensive going down well in the EU I see. Fortunately they’re not part of a superpower rivalry trying to recruit big economies to their side, so no harm done. [on.ft.com/4l7Izuh]( ) [EU spurns economic dialogue wi...]( )
What’s your sign? RE: https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:mymiyz3x72kdfeb5nfmrk5my&cid=bafkreicjreerlffoi2cdhjfk2sfzsuybttqcdru6vh6ssvfkdlcw5kwvti
Trump: not even a good king. RE:
I'm not a fan of the yah-boo British parliamentary culture at all, but I do feel that when someone lands an absolute zinger of a question like this and literally brings receipts, there should at least be a chant of "NICE ONE MAGGIE" from the public gallery or an airhorn or something. RE:
The transmutation of ULEZ from green fascism which inspired a big opportunistic shift in Tory environment policy to a successful scrappage scheme which improved London’s air is now complete. See also Starmer shifting with the wind as per, in this case we’ll within a year. RE: https://amanita.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:mymiyz3x72kdfeb5nfmrk5my&cid=bafkreibcafpzcscyo2b36jvsbvsosjem2ipkyhg4ozncv5s34tnpzr33oq
“Key parts” but not all, in an unspecified number of days. RE:
In which case it’s failing in its task of protecting US producers from import competition, or they wouldn’t be generating serious amounts of revenue at all. Almost as if the administration’s multiple policy targets are utterly incoherent. RE:
This story is so good it feels like they decided on the TV docudrama first and then worked backwards and found people to do the actual crime based on the script. RE: